%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR105+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:55 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 4.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 94 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 116 ( 43 ~; 47 |; 20 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 8 sgn 21 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2341,X2342] : s__overlapsTemporally(X2341,X2342),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27874,axiom,
! [X851] :
( s__instance(X851,s__TimeInterval)
=> s__overlapsTemporally(X851,X851) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27874) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1138,X136) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X137)
| s__instance(X1139,X136) )
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& s__instance(X1138,X12) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_33389,axiom,
! [X1090] :
( s__instance(X1090,s__TimePosition)
=> ( s__instance(X1090,s__TimePoint)
=> ? [X589] :
( s__temporalPart(X1090,X589)
& s__instance(X589,s__TimeInterval)
& s__instance(X589,s__TimePosition) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_33389) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_12232,axiom,
s__instance(s__NorthAtlanticOcean,s__BodyOfWater),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_12232) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341,X2342] : s__overlapsTemporally(X2341,X2342),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2347] :
( s__overlapsTemporally(X2347,X2347)
| ~ s__instance(X2347,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27874])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X2343,X2344] : ~ s__overlapsTemporally(X2343,X2344),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
| s__overlapsTemporally(X1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ s__overlapsTemporally(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2711,X2712,X2713,X2714,X2715,X2716,X2717,X2718,X2719] :
( ( X2718 = s__UnionFn(X2719,X2717)
| ~ s__instance(esk23_3(X2717,X2718,X2719),X2718)
| ~ s__instance(esk22_3(X2717,X2718,X2719),X2718)
| ~ s__instance(esk24_3(X2717,X2718,X2719),X2717) )
& ( X2718 = s__UnionFn(X2719,X2717)
| ~ s__instance(esk23_3(X2717,X2718,X2719),X2718)
| ~ s__instance(esk22_3(X2717,X2718,X2719),X2718)
| ~ s__instance(esk24_3(X2717,X2718,X2719),X2719) )
& ( X2718 = s__UnionFn(X2719,X2717)
| s__instance(esk24_3(X2717,X2718,X2719),X2718) )
& ( X2718 = s__UnionFn(X2719,X2717)
| s__instance(esk23_3(X2717,X2718,X2719),X2717) )
& ( X2718 = s__UnionFn(X2719,X2717)
| s__instance(esk22_3(X2717,X2718,X2719),X2719) )
& ( X2718 = s__UnionFn(X2719,X2717)
| s__instance(X2717,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2718 = s__UnionFn(X2719,X2717)
| s__instance(X2718,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2718 = s__UnionFn(X2719,X2717)
| s__instance(X2719,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2712 != s__UnionFn(X2713,X2711)
| ~ s__instance(X2711,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2712,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2713,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2716,X2712)
| ~ s__instance(X2715,X2711)
| ~ s__instance(X2714,X2713)
| s__instance(X2716,X2711)
| s__instance(X2716,X2713) )
& ( X2712 != s__UnionFn(X2713,X2711)
| ~ s__instance(X2711,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2712,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2713,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2716,X2712)
| ~ s__instance(X2715,X2711)
| ~ s__instance(X2714,X2713)
| s__instance(X2715,X2712) )
& ( X2712 != s__UnionFn(X2713,X2711)
| ~ s__instance(X2711,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2712,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2713,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2716,X2712)
| ~ s__instance(X2715,X2711)
| ~ s__instance(X2714,X2713)
| s__instance(X2714,X2712) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
| s__instance(esk22_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X2411] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X2411,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2411,s__TimePoint)
| s__temporalPart(X2411,esk3_1(X2411)) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2411,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2411,s__TimePoint)
| s__instance(esk3_1(X2411),s__TimeInterval) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2411,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2411,s__TimePoint)
| s__instance(esk3_1(X2411),s__TimePosition) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_33389])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
X1 = s__UnionFn(s__TimeInterval,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePoint)
| s__instance(esk3_1(X1),s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
s__instance(s__NorthAtlanticOcean,s__BodyOfWater),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_12232]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePoint) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__instance(s__NorthAtlanticOcean,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR105+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:01:18 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/4.51 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/4.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/4.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3207033 completed with status 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.26/4.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/4.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/4.51 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 0.26/4.51 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/4.51 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1485 seconds (1485 total)
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 134s (1) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 149s (1) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 134s (1) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 134s (1) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 134s (1) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3207040 completed with status 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/4.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/4.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/4.51 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 0.26/4.51 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/4.51 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1485 seconds (1485 total)
% 0.26/4.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 134s (1) cores
% 0.26/4.51 % Preprocessing time : 0.049 s
% 0.26/4.51
% 0.26/4.51 % Proof found!
% 0.26/4.51 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/4.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/4.51 % Parsed axioms : 55592
% 0.26/4.51 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55281
% 0.26/4.51 % Initial clauses : 452
% 0.26/4.51 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 19
% 0.26/4.51 % Initial clauses in saturation : 433
% 0.26/4.51 % Processed clauses : 226
% 0.26/4.51 % ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.26/4.51 % ...subsumed : 14
% 0.26/4.51 % ...remaining for further processing : 201
% 0.26/4.51 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.26/4.51 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Backward-subsumed : 21
% 0.26/4.51 % Backward-rewritten : 73
% 0.26/4.51 % Generated clauses : 941
% 0.26/4.51 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 926
% 0.26/4.51 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.26/4.51 % Paramodulations : 937
% 0.26/4.51 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.26/4.51 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.26/4.51 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Total rewrite steps : 93
% 0.26/4.51 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.26/4.51 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/4.51 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/4.51 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/4.51 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/4.51 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/4.51 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/4.51 % Current number of processed clauses : 105
% 0.26/4.51 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 48
% 0.26/4.51 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.26/4.51 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.26/4.51 % Non-unit-clauses : 54
% 0.26/4.51 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 721
% 0.26/4.51 % ...number of literals in the above : 2270
% 0.26/4.51 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Current number of archived clauses : 94
% 0.26/4.51 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 793
% 0.26/4.51 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 693
% 0.26/4.51 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.26/4.51 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 969
% 0.26/4.51 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 421
% 0.26/4.51 % BW rewrite match attempts : 810
% 0.26/4.51 % BW rewrite match successes : 354
% 0.26/4.51 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/4.51 % Termbank termtop insertions : 695864
% 0.26/4.51 % Search garbage collected termcells : 297164
% 0.26/4.51
% 0.26/4.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/4.51 % User time : 0.532 s
% 0.26/4.51 % System time : 0.261 s
% 0.26/4.51 % Total time : 0.793 s
% 0.26/4.51 % Maximum resident set size: 137272 pages
% 0.26/4.51
% 0.26/4.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/4.51 % User time : 3.802 s
% 0.26/4.51 % System time : 0.696 s
% 0.26/4.51 % Total time : 4.497 s
% 0.26/4.51 % Maximum resident set size: 64000 pages
% 0.26/4.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------