%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR107+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 5.83s 4.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 3 sgn 4 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2341,X2342] :
( s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2342)
& s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2341) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27874,axiom,
! [X851] :
( s__instance(X851,s__TimeInterval)
=> s__overlapsTemporally(X851,X851) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27874) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval38_3,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341,X2342] :
( s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2342)
& s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2341) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X2343,X2344] :
( ~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2344)
| ~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2343) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X2347] :
( s__overlapsTemporally(X2347,X2347)
| ~ s__instance(X2347,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27874])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2)
| ~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
| s__overlapsTemporally(X1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval38_3,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR107+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:56:42 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.83/4.95 % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.83/4.95 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.83/4.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % new_bool_3 with pid 2588852 completed with status 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 5.83/4.95 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.83/4.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 5.83/4.95 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.83/4.95 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 5.83/4.95 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 5.83/4.95 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2588855 completed with status 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 5.83/4.95 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.83/4.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 5.83/4.95 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.83/4.95 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 5.83/4.95 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 5.83/4.95 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 5.83/4.95 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 5.83/4.95 % Preprocessing time : 0.042 s
% 5.83/4.95
% 5.83/4.95 % Proof found!
% 5.83/4.95 % SZS status Theorem
% 5.83/4.95 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.83/4.95 % Parsed axioms : 55597
% 5.83/4.95 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55429
% 5.83/4.95 % Initial clauses : 214
% 5.83/4.95 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 5.83/4.95 % Initial clauses in saturation : 206
% 5.83/4.95 % Processed clauses : 52
% 5.83/4.95 % ...of these trivial : 5
% 5.83/4.95 % ...subsumed : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 5.83/4.95 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 5.83/4.95 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 5.83/4.95 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Generated clauses : 27
% 5.83/4.95 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21
% 5.83/4.95 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Paramodulations : 26
% 5.83/4.95 % Factorizations : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % NegExts : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 5.83/4.95 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 5.83/4.95 % ...of those cached : 4
% 5.83/4.95 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Propositional check models : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 5.83/4.95 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 5.83/4.95 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 5.83/4.95 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 5.83/4.95 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 5.83/4.95 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 5.83/4.95 % Current number of processed clauses : 45
% 5.83/4.95 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 35
% 5.83/4.95 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 5.83/4.95 % Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 5.83/4.95 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 175
% 5.83/4.95 % ...number of literals in the above : 821
% 5.83/4.95 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 5.83/4.95 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
% 5.83/4.95 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 5.83/4.95 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 5.83/4.95 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Condensation successes : 0
% 5.83/4.95 % Termbank termtop insertions : 668392
% 5.83/4.95 % Search garbage collected termcells : 293693
% 5.83/4.95
% 5.83/4.95 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.83/4.95 % User time : 0.388 s
% 5.83/4.95 % System time : 0.231 s
% 5.83/4.95 % Total time : 0.619 s
% 5.83/4.95 % Maximum resident set size: 136760 pages
% 5.83/4.95
% 5.83/4.95 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.83/4.95 % User time : 3.852 s
% 5.83/4.95 % System time : 0.425 s
% 5.83/4.95 % Total time : 4.277 s
% 5.83/4.95 % Maximum resident set size: 63744 pages
% 5.83/4.95 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------