%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR108+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.96s 1.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 18 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 97 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 96 ( 41 ~; 35 |; 16 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-10 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 16 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 84 ( 38 sgn 30 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(local_24,axiom,
! [X1223,X1224,X1225,X1226,X1227,X1228,X1229,X1230,X1231,X1232] :
( s__testPred44_1__10(X1223,X1224,X1225,X1226,X1227,X1228,X1229,X1230,X1231,X1232)
=> ( s__instance(X1232,s__Reptile)
& s__instance(X1231,s__Mammal)
& s__instance(X1224,s__Bird)
& s__instance(X1223,s__Amphibian) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_24) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
( s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Animal)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Animal)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Animal)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Animal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_10441,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Mammal,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_10441) ).
fof(local_23,axiom,
s__testPred44_1__10(s__Entity44_1,s__Entity44_2,s__Entity44_3,s__Entity44_4,s__Entity44_5,s__Entity44_6,s__Entity44_7,s__Entity44_8,s__Entity44_9,s__Entity44_10),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_23) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_9340,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_9340) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_20469,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Bird,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_20469) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_16110,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Amphibian,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_16110) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1251,X1252,X1253] :
( s__instance(X1253,X1252)
| ~ s__instance(X1253,X1251)
| ~ s__subclass(X1251,X1252)
| ~ s__instance(X1251,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1252,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1249,X1250] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X1249,X1250)
| s__instance(X1250,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X1249,X1250)
| s__instance(X1249,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1235,X1236,X1237,X1238,X1239,X1240,X1241,X1242,X1243,X1244] :
( ( ~ s__testPred44_1__10(X1235,X1236,X1237,X1238,X1239,X1240,X1241,X1242,X1243,X1244)
| s__instance(X1244,s__Reptile) )
& ( ~ s__testPred44_1__10(X1235,X1236,X1237,X1238,X1239,X1240,X1241,X1242,X1243,X1244)
| s__instance(X1243,s__Mammal) )
& ( ~ s__testPred44_1__10(X1235,X1236,X1237,X1238,X1239,X1240,X1241,X1242,X1243,X1244)
| s__instance(X1236,s__Bird) )
& ( ~ s__testPred44_1__10(X1235,X1236,X1237,X1238,X1239,X1240,X1241,X1242,X1243,X1244)
| s__instance(X1235,s__Amphibian) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[local_24])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ ( s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Animal)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Animal)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Animal)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Animal) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__subclass(s__Mammal,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_10441]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s__testPred44_1__10(X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X1,X10)
| s__instance(X1,s__Mammal) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__testPred44_1__10(s__Entity44_1,s__Entity44_2,s__Entity44_3,s__Entity44_4,s__Entity44_5,s__Entity44_6,s__Entity44_7,s__Entity44_8,s__Entity44_9,s__Entity44_10),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_23]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Animal) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Mammal)
| s__instance(X1,s__Animal) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Mammal),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_9340]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ s__testPred44_1__10(X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__Reptile) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Animal) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Animal),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Reptile)
| s__instance(X1,s__Animal) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Reptile),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Animal) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Animal),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__subclass(s__Bird,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_20469]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ s__testPred44_1__10(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10)
| s__instance(X1,s__Bird) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
s__subclass(s__Amphibian,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_16110]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ s__testPred44_1__10(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10)
| s__instance(X1,s__Amphibian) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Animal)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Animal) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Bird)
| s__instance(X1,s__Animal) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Bird),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Amphibian)
| s__instance(X1,s__Animal) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Animal),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR108+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:04:36 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.96/1.51 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.96/1.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.96/1.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1738015 completed with status 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 1.96/1.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.96/1.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.96/1.51 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 1.96/1.51 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.96/1.51 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m with 136s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S3S with 136s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1738027 completed with status 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 1.96/1.51 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.96/1.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.96/1.51 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 1.96/1.51 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.96/1.51 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 1.96/1.51 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 1.96/1.51 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.96/1.51
% 1.96/1.51 % Proof found!
% 1.96/1.51 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.96/1.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.96/1.51 % Parsed axioms : 38006
% 1.96/1.51 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37828
% 1.96/1.51 % Initial clauses : 191
% 1.96/1.51 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 1.96/1.51 % Initial clauses in saturation : 187
% 1.96/1.51 % Processed clauses : 838
% 1.96/1.51 % ...of these trivial : 257
% 1.96/1.51 % ...subsumed : 1
% 1.96/1.51 % ...remaining for further processing : 580
% 1.96/1.51 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 1.96/1.51 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 1.96/1.51 % Generated clauses : 854
% 1.96/1.51 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 772
% 1.96/1.51 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 1.96/1.51 % Paramodulations : 854
% 1.96/1.51 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % NegExts : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Total rewrite steps : 318
% 1.96/1.51 % ...of those cached : 279
% 1.96/1.51 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.96/1.51 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.96/1.51 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.96/1.51 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.96/1.51 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.96/1.51 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.96/1.51 % Current number of processed clauses : 395
% 1.96/1.51 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 218
% 1.96/1.51 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 1.96/1.51 % Non-unit-clauses : 175
% 1.96/1.51 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 296
% 1.96/1.51 % ...number of literals in the above : 564
% 1.96/1.51 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Current number of archived clauses : 185
% 1.96/1.51 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1937
% 1.96/1.51 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1817
% 1.96/1.51 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 1.96/1.51 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85
% 1.96/1.51 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 1.96/1.51 % BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 1.96/1.51 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.96/1.51 % Termbank termtop insertions : 258988
% 1.96/1.51 % Search garbage collected termcells : 125453
% 1.96/1.51
% 1.96/1.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.96/1.51 % User time : 0.157 s
% 1.96/1.51 % System time : 0.076 s
% 1.96/1.51 % Total time : 0.233 s
% 1.96/1.51 % Maximum resident set size: 52092 pages
% 1.96/1.51
% 1.96/1.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.96/1.51 % User time : 1.086 s
% 1.96/1.51 % System time : 0.204 s
% 1.96/1.51 % Total time : 1.289 s
% 1.96/1.51 % Maximum resident set size: 31744 pages
% 1.96/1.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------