%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR108+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:57 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.27s 2.88s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 1 sgn 3 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2351] :
( s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X2351)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X2351)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X2351)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X2351) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27371,axiom,
! [X857] : s__instance(X857,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27371) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2351] :
( s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X2351)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X2351)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X2351)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X2351) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X2352] :
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X2352)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X2352)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X2352)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X2352) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X2353] : s__instance(X2353,s__Entity),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27371]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X1)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X1)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR108+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:02:40 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.27/2.88 % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.27/2.88 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.27/2.88 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % new_bool_3 with pid 1253955 completed with status 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 2.27/2.88 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.27/2.88 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.27/2.88 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.27/2.88 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 2.27/2.88 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1253958 completed with status 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 2.27/2.88 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.27/2.88 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.27/2.88 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.27/2.88 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 2.27/2.88 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 2.27/2.88 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 2.27/2.88 % Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 2.27/2.88
% 2.27/2.88 % Proof found!
% 2.27/2.88 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.27/2.88 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.27/2.88 % Parsed axioms : 55611
% 2.27/2.88 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55562
% 2.27/2.88 % Initial clauses : 56
% 2.27/2.88 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 2.27/2.88 % Initial clauses in saturation : 52
% 2.27/2.88 % Processed clauses : 78
% 2.27/2.88 % ...of these trivial : 11
% 2.27/2.88 % ...subsumed : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % ...remaining for further processing : 67
% 2.27/2.88 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Backward-rewritten : 11
% 2.27/2.88 % Generated clauses : 41
% 2.27/2.88 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33
% 2.27/2.88 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 2.27/2.88 % Paramodulations : 41
% 2.27/2.88 % Factorizations : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % NegExts : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Total rewrite steps : 29
% 2.27/2.88 % ...of those cached : 11
% 2.27/2.88 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Propositional check models : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.27/2.88 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.27/2.88 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.27/2.88 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.27/2.88 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.27/2.88 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.27/2.88 % Current number of processed clauses : 56
% 2.27/2.88 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 49
% 2.27/2.88 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 2.27/2.88 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% 2.27/2.88 % ...number of literals in the above : 24
% 2.27/2.88 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 2.27/2.88 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 2.27/2.88 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 2.27/2.88 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 2.27/2.88 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 2.27/2.88 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 2.27/2.88 % BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 2.27/2.88 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Condensation successes : 0
% 2.27/2.88 % Termbank termtop insertions : 650575
% 2.27/2.88 % Search garbage collected termcells : 291079
% 2.27/2.88
% 2.27/2.88 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.27/2.88 % User time : 0.184 s
% 2.27/2.88 % System time : 0.099 s
% 2.27/2.88 % Total time : 0.284 s
% 2.27/2.88 % Maximum resident set size: 137276 pages
% 2.27/2.88
% 2.27/2.88 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.27/2.88 % User time : 2.207 s
% 2.27/2.88 % System time : 0.217 s
% 2.27/2.88 % Total time : 2.424 s
% 2.27/2.88 % Maximum resident set size: 63744 pages
% 2.27/2.88 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------