↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR108+7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 26.81s 28.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 26.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (   9   ~;   6   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   1 sgn   3   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    ? [X2351] :
      ( s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X2351)
      & s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X2351)
      & s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X2351)
      & s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X2351) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27371,axiom,
    ! [X857] : s__instance(X857,s__Entity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27371) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2351] :
        ( s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X2351)
        & s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X2351)
        & s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X2351)
        & s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X2351) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2352] :
      ( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X2352)
      | ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X2352)
      | ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X2352)
      | ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X2352) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X858] : s__instance(X858,s__Entity),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27371]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : CSR108+7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 08:31:05 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 26.81/28.99  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 26.81/28.99  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 26.81/28.99  # Preprocessing time       : 1.154 s
% 26.81/28.99  
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof found!
% 26.81/28.99  # SZS status Theorem
% 26.81/28.99  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object total steps             : 8
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object clause steps            : 3
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 2
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 26.81/28.99  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 26.81/28.99  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 26.81/28.99  # Parsed axioms                        : 55611
% 26.81/28.99  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55591
% 26.81/28.99  # Initial clauses                      : 24
% 26.81/28.99  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 26.81/28.99  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 26.81/28.99  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 26.81/28.99  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # ...remaining for further processing  : 3
% 26.81/28.99  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 26.81/28.99  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 26.81/28.99  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 26.81/28.99  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 26.81/28.99  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 26.81/28.99  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 26.81/28.99  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 26.81/28.99  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 26.81/28.99  # ...number of literals in the above   : 37
% 26.81/28.99  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 26.81/28.99  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 649299
% 26.81/28.99  
% 26.81/28.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 26.81/28.99  # User time                : 1.078 s
% 26.81/28.99  # System time              : 0.076 s
% 26.81/28.99  # Total time               : 1.154 s
% 26.81/28.99  # Maximum resident set size: 141372 pages
% 26.81/32.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.67  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.67  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.68  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.68  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.68  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.68  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.69  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.69  eprover: No such file or directory
% 26.81/32.69  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 26.81/32.69  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------