%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : CSR108+7 : TPTP v7.3.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n183.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.5MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 27 12:29:14 EST 2019
% Result : Theorem 1.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 19 ~; 17 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X1)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X1)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X1)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmptxzADj/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(11,axiom,
s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmptxzADj/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',local_22) ).
fof(14,axiom,
s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmptxzADj/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',local_21) ).
fof(21,axiom,
s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmptxzADj/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',local_14) ).
fof(22,axiom,
s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmptxzADj/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',local_13) ).
fof(26,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X1)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X1)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X1)
& s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
fof(27,negated_conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X1)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X1)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
fof(28,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X2)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X2)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
cnf(29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,X1)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,X1)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
cnf(39,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
cnf(42,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
cnf(55,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
cnf(56,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity44_1,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
cnf(62,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_2,s__Entity)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Entity)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Entity) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[29,56,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(63,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_9,s__Entity)
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Entity) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[62,55,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(64,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| $false
| ~ s__instance(s__Entity44_10,s__Entity) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[63,42,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(65,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| $false
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[64,39,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(66,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[65,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(67,negated_conjecture,
$false,
66,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR108+7 : TPTP v7.3.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.04/0.26 % Computer : n183.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.04/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.04/0.26 % Memory : 32218.5MB
% 0.04/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% 0.04/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.26 % DateTime : Tue Feb 19 10:27:12 CST 2019
% 0.04/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.30 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.30 --creating new selector for [CSR003+2.ax]
% 1.68/1.94 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmptxzADj/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 1.68/1.94 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmptxzADj/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 1.68/1.94 -prover status Theorem
% 1.68/1.94 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 1.68/1.94 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.68/1.94 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.68/1.94 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 1.68/1.94 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 1.68/1.94 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.68/1.94 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 1.68/1.94 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------