%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR109+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:58 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.46s 3.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 85 ( 17 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 98 ( 34 ~; 42 |; 18 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 16 sgn 20 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
? [X2351] : s__instance(X2351,s__Reptile),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
! [X1,X15] :
( s__subclass(X1,X15)
=> ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1138,X136) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X137)
| s__instance(X1139,X136) )
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& s__instance(X1138,X12) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_50887,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Batrachotoxin,s__Toxin),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_50887) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2351] : s__instance(X2351,s__Reptile),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X2420,X2421] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X2420,X2421)
| s__instance(X2421,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X2420,X2421)
| s__instance(X2420,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2501,X2502,X2503,X2504,X2505,X2506,X2507,X2508,X2509] :
( ( X2508 = s__UnionFn(X2509,X2507)
| ~ s__instance(esk7_3(X2507,X2508,X2509),X2508)
| ~ s__instance(esk6_3(X2507,X2508,X2509),X2508)
| ~ s__instance(esk8_3(X2507,X2508,X2509),X2507) )
& ( X2508 = s__UnionFn(X2509,X2507)
| ~ s__instance(esk7_3(X2507,X2508,X2509),X2508)
| ~ s__instance(esk6_3(X2507,X2508,X2509),X2508)
| ~ s__instance(esk8_3(X2507,X2508,X2509),X2509) )
& ( X2508 = s__UnionFn(X2509,X2507)
| s__instance(esk8_3(X2507,X2508,X2509),X2508) )
& ( X2508 = s__UnionFn(X2509,X2507)
| s__instance(esk7_3(X2507,X2508,X2509),X2507) )
& ( X2508 = s__UnionFn(X2509,X2507)
| s__instance(esk6_3(X2507,X2508,X2509),X2509) )
& ( X2508 = s__UnionFn(X2509,X2507)
| s__instance(X2507,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2508 = s__UnionFn(X2509,X2507)
| s__instance(X2508,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2508 = s__UnionFn(X2509,X2507)
| s__instance(X2509,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2502 != s__UnionFn(X2503,X2501)
| ~ s__instance(X2501,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2502,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2503,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2506,X2502)
| ~ s__instance(X2505,X2501)
| ~ s__instance(X2504,X2503)
| s__instance(X2506,X2501)
| s__instance(X2506,X2503) )
& ( X2502 != s__UnionFn(X2503,X2501)
| ~ s__instance(X2501,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2502,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2503,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2506,X2502)
| ~ s__instance(X2505,X2501)
| ~ s__instance(X2504,X2503)
| s__instance(X2505,X2502) )
& ( X2502 != s__UnionFn(X2503,X2501)
| ~ s__instance(X2501,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2502,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2503,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2506,X2502)
| ~ s__instance(X2505,X2501)
| ~ s__instance(X2504,X2503)
| s__instance(X2504,X2502) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X2352] : ~ s__instance(X2352,s__Reptile),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
s__subclass(s__Batrachotoxin,s__Toxin),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_50887]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,s__Reptile),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
| s__instance(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
s__instance(s__Batrachotoxin,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
X1 = s__UnionFn(s__Reptile,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR109+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:07:44 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.46/3.27 % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.46/3.27 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 4.46/3.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3414769 completed with status 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 4.46/3.27 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 4.46/3.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.46/3.27 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 4.46/3.27 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 4.46/3.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1490 seconds (1490 total)
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 150s (1) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 135s (1) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting new_bool_3 with 135s (1) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting new_bool_1 with 135s (1) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3414775 completed with status 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 4.46/3.27 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 4.46/3.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.46/3.27 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 4.46/3.27 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 4.46/3.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1490 seconds (1490 total)
% 4.46/3.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 4.46/3.27 % Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% 4.46/3.27
% 4.46/3.27 % Proof found!
% 4.46/3.27 % SZS status Theorem
% 4.46/3.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.46/3.27 % Parsed axioms : 55589
% 4.46/3.27 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55441
% 4.46/3.27 % Initial clauses : 243
% 4.46/3.27 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 21
% 4.46/3.27 % Initial clauses in saturation : 222
% 4.46/3.27 % Processed clauses : 213
% 4.46/3.27 % ...of these trivial : 25
% 4.46/3.27 % ...subsumed : 2
% 4.46/3.27 % ...remaining for further processing : 186
% 4.46/3.27 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Backward-subsumed : 39
% 4.46/3.27 % Backward-rewritten : 91
% 4.46/3.27 % Generated clauses : 1051
% 4.46/3.27 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1032
% 4.46/3.27 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Paramodulations : 1046
% 4.46/3.27 % Factorizations : 2
% 4.46/3.27 % NegExts : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Total rewrite steps : 136
% 4.46/3.27 % ...of those cached : 21
% 4.46/3.27 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Propositional check models : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.46/3.27 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.46/3.27 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.46/3.27 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.46/3.27 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.46/3.27 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.46/3.27 % Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 4.46/3.27 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 50
% 4.46/3.27 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 4.46/3.27 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 4.46/3.27 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 4.46/3.27 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 514
% 4.46/3.27 % ...number of literals in the above : 1354
% 4.46/3.27 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Current number of archived clauses : 133
% 4.46/3.27 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 263
% 4.46/3.27 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 245
% 4.46/3.27 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 4.46/3.27 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 520
% 4.46/3.27 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 424
% 4.46/3.27 % BW rewrite match attempts : 773
% 4.46/3.27 % BW rewrite match successes : 385
% 4.46/3.27 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Condensation successes : 0
% 4.46/3.27 % Termbank termtop insertions : 673449
% 4.46/3.27 % Search garbage collected termcells : 294052
% 4.46/3.27
% 4.46/3.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.46/3.27 % User time : 0.373 s
% 4.46/3.27 % System time : 0.205 s
% 4.46/3.27 % Total time : 0.578 s
% 4.46/3.27 % Maximum resident set size: 137272 pages
% 4.46/3.27
% 4.46/3.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.46/3.27 % User time : 2.616 s
% 4.46/3.27 % System time : 0.519 s
% 4.46/3.27 % Total time : 3.134 s
% 4.46/3.27 % Maximum resident set size: 64000 pages
% 4.46/3.27 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------