↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR113+18 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.77s 2.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (   0 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   9 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_659,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ loc(X1,X2)
    | ~ scar(X1,X3)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5)
    | ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xvsq_n3f/lgb.p',i_0_659) ).

cnf(i_0_170,hypothesis,
    val(c42,new_york_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xvsq_n3f/lgb.p',i_0_170) ).

cnf(i_0_171,hypothesis,
    sub(c42,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xvsq_n3f/lgb.p',i_0_171) ).

cnf(i_0_174,hypothesis,
    sub(c4,freiheitsstatue_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xvsq_n3f/lgb.p',i_0_174) ).

cnf(i_0_163,hypothesis,
    subs(c8,stehen_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xvsq_n3f/lgb.p',i_0_163) ).

cnf(i_0_164,hypothesis,
    scar(c8,c4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xvsq_n3f/lgb.p',i_0_164) ).

cnf(i_0_173,hypothesis,
    attr(c41,c42),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xvsq_n3f/lgb.p',i_0_173) ).

cnf(i_0_165,hypothesis,
    loc(c8,c53),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xvsq_n3f/lgb.p',i_0_165) ).

cnf(c_0_668,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ loc(X1,X2)
    | ~ scar(X1,X3)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5)
    | ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
    i_0_659 ).

cnf(c_0_669,hypothesis,
    val(c42,new_york_0),
    i_0_170 ).

cnf(c_0_670,hypothesis,
    sub(c42,name_1_1),
    i_0_171 ).

cnf(c_0_671,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
    | ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X3,c42)
    | ~ scar(X2,X1)
    | ~ loc(X2,X4) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_668,c_0_669]),c_0_670])]) ).

cnf(c_0_672,hypothesis,
    sub(c4,freiheitsstatue_1_1),
    i_0_174 ).

cnf(c_0_673,hypothesis,
    ( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X2,c42)
    | ~ scar(X1,c4)
    | ~ loc(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_671,c_0_672]) ).

cnf(c_0_674,hypothesis,
    subs(c8,stehen_1_1),
    i_0_163 ).

cnf(c_0_675,hypothesis,
    scar(c8,c4),
    i_0_164 ).

cnf(c_0_676,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c42)
    | ~ loc(c8,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_673,c_0_674]),c_0_675])]) ).

cnf(c_0_677,hypothesis,
    attr(c41,c42),
    i_0_173 ).

cnf(c_0_678,hypothesis,
    loc(c8,c53),
    i_0_165 ).

cnf(c_0_679,hypothesis,
    ~ loc(c8,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_676,c_0_677]) ).

cnf(c_0_680,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_678,c_0_679]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR113+18 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 15:02:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.43/0.62  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.62  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.43/0.62  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.43/0.62  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.77/2.81  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.77/2.81  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.77/2.81  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.77/2.81  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.77/2.81  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.77/2.81  #
% 8.77/2.81  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 8.77/2.81  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.77/2.81  
% 8.77/2.81  # Proof found!
% 8.77/2.81  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.77/2.81  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.77/2.81  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.77/2.81  
% 8.77/2.81  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.77/2.81  # User time                : 0.044 s
% 8.77/2.81  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 8.77/2.81  # Total time               : 0.051 s
% 8.77/2.81  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.77/2.81  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------