%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.76s 2.88s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 19 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_732,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,usa_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i0mfw2m7/lgb.p',i_0_732) ).
cnf(i_0_237,hypothesis,
val(c114,usa_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i0mfw2m7/lgb.p',i_0_237) ).
cnf(i_0_238,hypothesis,
sub(c114,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i0mfw2m7/lgb.p',i_0_238) ).
cnf(i_0_241,hypothesis,
attr(c113,c114),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i0mfw2m7/lgb.p',i_0_241) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i0mfw2m7/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_603,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i0mfw2m7/lgb.p',i_0_603) ).
cnf(i_0_602,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i0mfw2m7/lgb.p',i_0_602) ).
cnf(i_0_233,hypothesis,
attr(c95,c96),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i0mfw2m7/lgb.p',i_0_233) ).
cnf(i_0_231,hypothesis,
sub(c96,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-i0mfw2m7/lgb.p',i_0_231) ).
cnf(c_0_742,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,usa_0) ),
i_0_732 ).
cnf(c_0_743,hypothesis,
val(c114,usa_0),
i_0_237 ).
cnf(c_0_744,hypothesis,
sub(c114,name_1_1),
i_0_238 ).
cnf(c_0_745,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c114)
| ~ scar(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_742,c_0_743]),c_0_744])]) ).
cnf(c_0_746,hypothesis,
attr(c113,c114),
i_0_241 ).
cnf(c_0_747,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_748,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_745,c_0_746]) ).
cnf(c_0_749,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_747,c_0_748]) ).
cnf(c_0_750,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
i_0_603 ).
cnf(c_0_751,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_749,c_0_750]) ).
cnf(c_0_752,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(name_1_1,nil))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_751,c_0_750]) ).
cnf(c_0_753,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_602 ).
cnf(c_0_754,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_752,c_0_753]) ).
cnf(c_0_755,hypothesis,
attr(c95,c96),
i_0_233 ).
cnf(c_0_756,hypothesis,
sub(c96,name_1_1),
i_0_231 ).
cnf(c_0_757,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_754,c_0_755]),c_0_756])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR113+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:54:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.76/2.88 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.76/2.88 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.76/2.88 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.76/2.88 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.76/2.88 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.76/2.88 #
% 8.76/2.88 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 8.76/2.88 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.76/2.88
% 8.76/2.88 # Proof found!
% 8.76/2.88 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.76/2.88 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.76/2.88 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.76/2.88
% 8.76/2.88 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.76/2.88 # User time : 0.038 s
% 8.76/2.88 # System time : 0.008 s
% 8.76/2.88 # Total time : 0.046 s
% 8.76/2.88 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.76/2.88
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------