%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.72s 2.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 66 ( 0 equ; 45 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1019,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ flp(X2,X4)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_1019) ).
cnf(i_0_494,hypothesis,
val(c7173,new_york_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_494) ).
cnf(i_0_495,hypothesis,
sub(c7173,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_495) ).
cnf(i_0_887,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_887) ).
cnf(i_0_886,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_886) ).
cnf(i_0_888,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_888) ).
cnf(i_0_876,plain,
( flp(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_876) ).
cnf(i_0_499,hypothesis,
loc(c7166,c7202),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_499) ).
cnf(i_0_498,hypothesis,
sub(c7166,freiheitsstatue_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_498) ).
cnf(i_0_488,hypothesis,
in(c7202,c7172),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_488) ).
cnf(i_0_497,hypothesis,
attr(c7172,c7173),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eotoszfv/input.p',i_0_497) ).
cnf(c_0_1031,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ flp(X2,X4)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
i_0_1019 ).
cnf(c_0_1032,hypothesis,
val(c7173,new_york_0),
i_0_494 ).
cnf(c_0_1033,hypothesis,
sub(c7173,name_1_1),
i_0_495 ).
cnf(c_0_1034,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ flp(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X4,c7173)
| ~ sub(X2,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1031,c_0_1032]),c_0_1033])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1035,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_887 ).
cnf(c_0_1036,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_886 ).
cnf(c_0_1037,plain,
( ~ flp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X2,c7173)
| ~ sub(X3,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X3,X4),X1)
| ~ loc(X3,X4) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1034,c_0_1035]),c_0_1036]) ).
cnf(c_0_1038,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_888 ).
cnf(c_0_1039,plain,
( ~ flp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X2,c7173)
| ~ sub(X3,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
| ~ loc(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1037,c_0_1038]) ).
cnf(c_0_1040,plain,
( flp(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
i_0_876 ).
cnf(c_0_1041,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c7173)
| ~ sub(X2,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1039,c_0_1040]) ).
cnf(c_0_1042,hypothesis,
loc(c7166,c7202),
i_0_499 ).
cnf(c_0_1043,hypothesis,
sub(c7166,freiheitsstatue_1_1),
i_0_498 ).
cnf(c_0_1044,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c7173)
| ~ in(c7202,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1041,c_0_1042]),c_0_1043])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1045,hypothesis,
in(c7202,c7172),
i_0_488 ).
cnf(c_0_1046,hypothesis,
attr(c7172,c7173),
i_0_497 ).
cnf(c_0_1047,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1044,c_0_1045]),c_0_1046])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR113+7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 00:21:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.38/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.38/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.38/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.72/2.78 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 8.72/2.78 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.72/2.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 8.72/2.78
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof found!
% 8.72/2.78 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.72/2.78 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object total steps : 28
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object clause steps : 17
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 8.72/2.78 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 8.72/2.78 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.72/2.78 # Parsed axioms : 1039
% 8.72/2.78 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Initial clauses : 1039
% 8.72/2.78 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1039
% 8.72/2.78 # Processed clauses : 1062
% 8.72/2.78 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 8.72/2.78 # ...subsumed : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # ...remaining for further processing : 1060
% 8.72/2.78 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Generated clauses : 1890
% 8.72/2.78 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1889
% 8.72/2.78 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 8.72/2.78 # Paramodulations : 1890
% 8.72/2.78 # Factorizations : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Current number of processed clauses : 1060
% 8.72/2.78 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 733
% 8.72/2.78 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Non-unit-clauses : 327
% 8.72/2.78 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1866
% 8.72/2.78 # ...number of literals in the above : 5739
% 8.72/2.78 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26210
% 8.72/2.78 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7941
% 8.72/2.78 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 8.72/2.78 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 750
% 8.72/2.78 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.72/2.78 # Termbank termtop insertions : 37038
% 8.72/2.78
% 8.72/2.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.72/2.78 # User time : 0.057 s
% 8.72/2.78 # System time : 0.010 s
% 8.72/2.78 # Total time : 0.067 s
% 8.72/2.78 # ...preprocessing : 0.026 s
% 8.72/2.78 # ...main loop : 0.041 s
% 8.72/2.78 # Maximum resident set size: 11292 pages
% 8.72/2.78
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------