%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+8 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.39s 3.04s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 19 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_790,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,new_york_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jkizdn7j/lgb.p',i_0_790) ).
cnf(i_0_288,hypothesis,
val(c78631,new_york_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jkizdn7j/lgb.p',i_0_288) ).
cnf(i_0_289,hypothesis,
sub(c78631,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jkizdn7j/lgb.p',i_0_289) ).
cnf(i_0_291,hypothesis,
attr(c78630,c78631),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jkizdn7j/lgb.p',i_0_291) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jkizdn7j/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_661,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jkizdn7j/lgb.p',i_0_661) ).
cnf(i_0_660,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jkizdn7j/lgb.p',i_0_660) ).
cnf(i_0_307,hypothesis,
attr(c18,c19),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jkizdn7j/lgb.p',i_0_307) ).
cnf(i_0_305,hypothesis,
sub(c19,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jkizdn7j/lgb.p',i_0_305) ).
cnf(c_0_800,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,new_york_0) ),
i_0_790 ).
cnf(c_0_801,hypothesis,
val(c78631,new_york_0),
i_0_288 ).
cnf(c_0_802,hypothesis,
sub(c78631,name_1_1),
i_0_289 ).
cnf(c_0_803,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c78631)
| ~ scar(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_800,c_0_801]),c_0_802])]) ).
cnf(c_0_804,hypothesis,
attr(c78630,c78631),
i_0_291 ).
cnf(c_0_805,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_806,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_803,c_0_804]) ).
cnf(c_0_807,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_805,c_0_806]) ).
cnf(c_0_808,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
i_0_661 ).
cnf(c_0_809,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_807,c_0_808]) ).
cnf(c_0_810,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(name_1_1,nil))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_809,c_0_808]) ).
cnf(c_0_811,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_660 ).
cnf(c_0_812,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_810,c_0_811]) ).
cnf(c_0_813,hypothesis,
attr(c18,c19),
i_0_307 ).
cnf(c_0_814,hypothesis,
sub(c19,name_1_1),
i_0_305 ).
cnf(c_0_815,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_812,c_0_813]),c_0_814])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR113+8 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 16:28:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.36/0.56 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.56 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.36/0.56 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.36/0.56 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.39/3.04 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.39/3.04 # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.39/3.04 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.39/3.04 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 10.39/3.04 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 10.39/3.04 #
% 10.39/3.04 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 10.39/3.04 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.39/3.04
% 10.39/3.04 # Proof found!
% 10.39/3.04 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.39/3.04 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.39/3.04 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.39/3.04
% 10.39/3.04 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.39/3.04 # User time : 0.038 s
% 10.39/3.04 # System time : 0.008 s
% 10.39/3.04 # Total time : 0.046 s
% 10.39/3.04 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 10.39/3.04
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------