↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR114+13 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.25s 1.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  233 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :  135 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  257 (  52   ~;  42   |; 161   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :  135 (   9 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   21 (  20 usr;   1 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   51 (  51 usr;  46 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (  14 sgn  15   !;  14   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( val(X2,rom_0)
      & subs(X5,stehen_1_1)
      & sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
      & sub(X2,name_1_1)
      & scar(X5,X4)
      & loc(X5,X3)
      & attr(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311) ).

fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311,hypothesis,
    ( varia(ziel_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(ziel_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(ziel_1_1,one)
    & gener(ziel_1_1,ge)
    & fact(ziel_1_1,real)
    & etype(ziel_1_1,int0)
    & card(ziel_1_1,int1)
    & sort(ziel_1_1,io)
    & varia(ferien__1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(ferien__1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(ferien__1_1,one)
    & gener(ferien__1_1,ge)
    & fact(ferien__1_1,real)
    & etype(ferien__1_1,int0)
    & card(ferien__1_1,int1)
    & sort(ferien__1_1,as)
    & varia(c694,varia_c)
    & refer(c694,refer_c)
    & quant(c694,quant_c)
    & gener(c694,gener_c)
    & fact(c694,real)
    & etype(c694,etype_c)
    & card(c694,card_c)
    & sort(c694,ent)
    & sort(rom_0,fe)
    & varia(stadt__1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(stadt__1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(stadt__1_1,one)
    & gener(stadt__1_1,ge)
    & fact(stadt__1_1,real)
    & etype(stadt__1_1,int0)
    & card(stadt__1_1,int1)
    & sort(stadt__1_1,io)
    & sort(stadt__1_1,d)
    & varia(c137,varia_c)
    & refer(c137,indet)
    & quant(c137,one)
    & gener(c137,sp)
    & fact(c137,real)
    & etype(c137,int0)
    & card(c137,int1)
    & sort(c137,na)
    & varia(c136,con)
    & refer(c136,det)
    & quant(c136,one)
    & gener(c136,sp)
    & fact(c136,real)
    & etype(c136,int0)
    & card(c136,int1)
    & sort(c136,io)
    & sort(c136,d)
    & sort(italienisch__1_1,nq)
    & varia(tourist_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(tourist_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(tourist_1_1,one)
    & gener(tourist_1_1,ge)
    & fact(tourist_1_1,real)
    & etype(tourist_1_1,int0)
    & card(tourist_1_1,int1)
    & sort(tourist_1_1,d)
    & varia(c123,varia_c)
    & refer(c123,refer_c)
    & quant(c123,mult)
    & gener(c123,gener_c)
    & fact(c123,real)
    & etype(c123,int1)
    & card(c123,cons(x_constant,cons(int1,nil)))
    & sort(c123,d)
    & varia(ferienziel_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(ferienziel_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(ferienziel_1_1,one)
    & gener(ferienziel_1_1,ge)
    & fact(ferienziel_1_1,real)
    & etype(ferienziel_1_1,int0)
    & card(ferienziel_1_1,int1)
    & sort(ferienziel_1_1,io)
    & sort(beliebt_1_1,nq)
    & varia(c117,varia_c)
    & refer(c117,indet)
    & quant(c117,one)
    & gener(c117,sp)
    & fact(c117,real)
    & etype(c117,int0)
    & card(c117,int1)
    & sort(c117,io)
    & sort(ponza_0,fe)
    & varia(name_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(name_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(name_1_1,one)
    & gener(name_1_1,ge)
    & fact(name_1_1,real)
    & etype(name_1_1,int0)
    & card(name_1_1,int1)
    & sort(name_1_1,na)
    & varia(gebietsinstitution_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(gebietsinstitution_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(gebietsinstitution_1_1,one)
    & gener(gebietsinstitution_1_1,ge)
    & fact(gebietsinstitution_1_1,real)
    & etype(gebietsinstitution_1_1,int0)
    & card(gebietsinstitution_1_1,int1)
    & sort(gebietsinstitution_1_1,io)
    & sort(gebietsinstitution_1_1,d)
    & varia(c113,varia_c)
    & refer(c113,indet)
    & quant(c113,one)
    & gener(c113,sp)
    & fact(c113,real)
    & etype(c113,int0)
    & card(c113,int1)
    & sort(c113,na)
    & varia(c112,con)
    & refer(c112,det)
    & quant(c112,one)
    & gener(c112,sp)
    & fact(c112,real)
    & etype(c112,int0)
    & card(c112,int1)
    & sort(c112,io)
    & sort(c112,d)
    & sub(ferienziel_1_1,ziel_1_1)
    & assoc(ferienziel_1_1,ferien__1_1)
    & tupl_p5(c694,c112,c117,c123,c136)
    & val(c137,rom_0)
    & sub(c137,name_1_1)
    & sub(c136,stadt__1_1)
    & attr(c136,c137)
    & prop(c123,italienisch__1_1)
    & pred(c123,tourist_1_1)
    & sub(c117,ferienziel_1_1)
    & prop(c117,beliebt_1_1)
    & val(c113,ponza_0)
    & sub(c113,name_1_1)
    & sub(c112,gebietsinstitution_1_1)
    & attr(c112,c113) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311) ).

fof(loc__stehen_1_1_loc,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( loc(X1,X2)
     => ? [X3] :
          ( subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
          & scar(X3,X1)
          & loc(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',loc__stehen_1_1_loc) ).

fof(state_adjective__in_state,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3)
        & prop(X1,X2) )
     => ? [X4,X5,X6] :
          ( val(X5,X3)
          & sub(X5,name_1_1)
          & sub(X4,land_1_1)
          & loc(X1,X6)
          & attr(X4,X5)
          & in(X6,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',state_adjective__in_state) ).

fof(fact_8886,axiom,
    state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',fact_8886) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
        ( val(X2,rom_0)
        & subs(X5,stehen_1_1)
        & sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
        & sub(X2,name_1_1)
        & scar(X5,X4)
        & loc(X5,X3)
        & attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ~ val(X9,rom_0)
      | ~ subs(X12,stehen_1_1)
      | ~ sub(X8,stadt__1_1)
      | ~ sub(X9,name_1_1)
      | ~ scar(X12,X11)
      | ~ loc(X12,X10)
      | ~ attr(X8,X9) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ val(X2,rom_0)
    | ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
    | ~ scar(X3,X5)
    | ~ loc(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    val(c137,rom_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    sub(c137,name_1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
    | ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ loc(X2,X4)
    | ~ scar(X2,X3)
    | ~ attr(X1,c137) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    attr(c136,c137),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    sub(c136,stadt__1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X54,X55] :
      ( ( ~ loc(X54,X55)
        | subs(esk12_2(X54,X55),stehen_1_1) )
      & ( ~ loc(X54,X55)
        | scar(esk12_2(X54,X55),X54) )
      & ( ~ loc(X54,X55)
        | loc(esk12_2(X54,X55),X55) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[loc__stehen_1_1_loc])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ loc(X1,X3)
    | ~ scar(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ loc(X1,X2)
    | subs(esk12_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    ( ~ loc(X1,X2)
    | ~ loc(esk12_2(X1,X2),X4)
    | ~ scar(esk12_2(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ loc(X1,X2)
    | scar(esk12_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X37,X38,X39] :
      ( ( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X38,X39)
        | ~ prop(X37,X38)
        | val(esk8_3(X37,X38,X39),X39) )
      & ( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X38,X39)
        | ~ prop(X37,X38)
        | sub(esk8_3(X37,X38,X39),name_1_1) )
      & ( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X38,X39)
        | ~ prop(X37,X38)
        | sub(esk7_3(X37,X38,X39),land_1_1) )
      & ( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X38,X39)
        | ~ prop(X37,X38)
        | loc(X37,esk9_3(X37,X38,X39)) )
      & ( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X38,X39)
        | ~ prop(X37,X38)
        | attr(esk7_3(X37,X38,X39),esk8_3(X37,X38,X39)) )
      & ( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X38,X39)
        | ~ prop(X37,X38)
        | in(esk9_3(X37,X38,X39),esk7_3(X37,X38,X39)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[state_adjective__in_state])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    ( ~ loc(X1,X2)
    | ~ loc(esk12_2(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ loc(X1,X2)
    | loc(esk12_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3)
    | ~ prop(X1,X2)
    | loc(X1,esk9_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    ~ loc(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ prop(X3,X1)
    | ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_8886]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    prop(c123,italienisch__1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ~ prop(X1,italienisch__1_1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR114+13 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:08:54 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.39  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/1.10  % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.25/1.10  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.25/1.10  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2704729 completed with status 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 2.25/1.10  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.25/1.10  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.25/1.10  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 2.25/1.10  % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.25/1.10  % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.25/1.10  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2704757 completed with status 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 2.25/1.10  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.25/1.10  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.25/1.10  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 2.25/1.10  % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.25/1.10  % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.25/1.10  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.25/1.10  % Preprocessing time       : 0.028 s
% 2.25/1.10  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.25/1.10  
% 2.25/1.10  % Proof found!
% 2.25/1.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.25/1.10  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.25/1.10  % Parsed axioms                        : 10189
% 2.25/1.10  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 9939
% 2.25/1.10  % Initial clauses                      : 540
% 2.25/1.10  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 540
% 2.25/1.10  % Processed clauses                    : 1022
% 2.25/1.10  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1022
% 2.25/1.10  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Backward-subsumed                    : 62
% 2.25/1.10  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Generated clauses                    : 548
% 2.25/1.10  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 547
% 2.25/1.10  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Paramodulations                      : 547
% 2.25/1.10  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % NegExts                              : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 2.25/1.10  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.25/1.10  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.25/1.10  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.25/1.10  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.25/1.10  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.25/1.10  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.25/1.10  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.25/1.10  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.25/1.10  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.25/1.10  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.25/1.10  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.25/1.10  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.25/1.10  % Current number of processed clauses  : 419
% 2.25/1.10  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 310
% 2.25/1.10  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.25/1.10  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 2.25/1.10  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 105
% 2.25/1.10  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 604
% 2.25/1.10  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1715
% 2.25/1.10  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Current number of archived clauses   : 603
% 2.25/1.10  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31504
% 2.25/1.10  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16015
% 2.25/1.10  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
% 2.25/1.10  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 259
% 2.25/1.10  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.25/1.10  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 75855
% 2.25/1.10  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 40776
% 2.25/1.10  
% 2.25/1.10  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.25/1.10  % User time                : 0.256 s
% 2.25/1.10  % System time              : 0.175 s
% 2.25/1.10  % Total time               : 0.431 s
% 2.25/1.10  % Maximum resident set size: 50208 pages
% 2.25/1.10  
% 2.25/1.10  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.25/1.10  % User time                : 0.820 s
% 2.25/1.10  % System time              : 0.557 s
% 2.25/1.10  % Total time               : 1.377 s
% 2.25/1.10  % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 2.25/1.10  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------