%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+16 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:04 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 5.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 138 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 108 ( 10 avg)
% Number of connectives : 140 ( 15 ~; 10 |; 115 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 108 ( 12 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 19 ( 18 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 40 ( 40 usr; 40 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 6 sgn 4 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_004_mw3_158,conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( val(X2,rom_0)
& sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& scar(X4,X3)
& attr(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_004_mw3_158) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158,hypothesis,
( sort(rom_0,fe)
& varia(name_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(name_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(name_1_1,one)
& gener(name_1_1,ge)
& fact(name_1_1,real)
& etype(name_1_1,int0)
& card(name_1_1,int1)
& sort(name_1_1,na)
& varia(stadt__1_1,varia_c)
& refer(stadt__1_1,refer_c)
& quant(stadt__1_1,one)
& gener(stadt__1_1,ge)
& fact(stadt__1_1,real)
& etype(stadt__1_1,int0)
& card(stadt__1_1,int1)
& sort(stadt__1_1,io)
& sort(stadt__1_1,d)
& varia(c820,varia_c)
& refer(c820,indet)
& quant(c820,one)
& gener(c820,sp)
& fact(c820,real)
& etype(c820,int0)
& card(c820,int1)
& sort(c820,na)
& varia(provinz_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(provinz_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(provinz_1_1,one)
& gener(provinz_1_1,ge)
& fact(provinz_1_1,real)
& etype(provinz_1_1,int0)
& card(provinz_1_1,int1)
& sort(provinz_1_1,io)
& sort(provinz_1_1,d)
& gener(geh__366ren_1_1,ge)
& fact(geh__366ren_1_1,real)
& sort(geh__366ren_1_1,st)
& varia(c819,con)
& refer(c819,det)
& quant(c819,one)
& gener(c819,sp)
& fact(c819,real)
& etype(c819,int0)
& card(c819,int1)
& sort(c819,io)
& sort(c819,d)
& varia(c814,con)
& refer(c814,det)
& quant(c814,one)
& gener(c814,sp)
& fact(c814,real)
& etype(c814,int0)
& card(c814,int1)
& sort(c814,io)
& sort(c814,d)
& gener(c672,sp)
& fact(c672,real)
& sort(c672,st)
& varia(bewohner__1_1,varia_c)
& refer(bewohner__1_1,refer_c)
& quant(bewohner__1_1,one)
& gener(bewohner__1_1,ge)
& fact(bewohner__1_1,real)
& etype(bewohner__1_1,int0)
& card(bewohner__1_1,int1)
& sort(bewohner__1_1,d)
& gener(haben_1_1,ge)
& fact(haben_1_1,real)
& sort(haben_1_1,st)
& varia(c43,varia_c)
& refer(c43,det)
& quant(c43,quant_c)
& gener(c43,sp)
& fact(c43,real)
& etype(c43,etype_c)
& card(c43,card_c)
& sort(c43,re)
& sort(c43,ta)
& sort(c43,mo)
& sort(c43,io)
& sort(c43,co)
& sort(c43,abs)
& varia(c660,varia_c)
& refer(c660,indet)
& quant(c660,nfquant)
& gener(c660,sp)
& fact(c660,real)
& etype(c660,int1)
& card(c660,int35895)
& sort(c660,d)
& gener(c657,sp)
& fact(c657,real)
& sort(c657,st)
& val(c820,rom_0)
& sub(c820,name_1_1)
& sub(c819,stadt__1_1)
& attr(c819,c820)
& sub(c814,provinz_1_1)
& subs(c672,geh__366ren_1_1)
& sspe(c672,c819)
& semrel(c672,c657)
& scar(c672,c43)
& assoc(c672,c814)
& pred(c660,bewohner__1_1)
& subs(c657,haben_1_1)
& scar(c657,c43)
& obj(c657,c660) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( val(X2,rom_0)
& sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& scar(X4,X3)
& attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_004_mw3_158]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11] :
( ~ val(X9,rom_0)
| ~ sub(X8,stadt__1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,name_1_1)
| ~ scar(X11,X10)
| ~ attr(X8,X9) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ val(X2,rom_0)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
val(c820,rom_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sub(c820,name_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ scar(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X1,c820) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
attr(c819,c820),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
sub(c819,stadt__1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
scar(c657,c43),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR114+16 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.38 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:09:31 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.73 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/5.73 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % new_bool_1 with pid 2705730 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/5.73 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.73 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.73 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.73 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.73 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2705737 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/5.73 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.73 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.73 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.73 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.73 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.73 % Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.16/5.73
% 0.16/5.73 % Proof found!
% 0.16/5.73 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/5.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/5.73 % Parsed axioms : 10189
% 0.16/5.73 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 10131
% 0.16/5.73 % Initial clauses : 175
% 0.16/5.73 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Initial clauses in saturation : 175
% 0.16/5.73 % Processed clauses : 244
% 0.16/5.73 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.16/5.73 % ...remaining for further processing : 238
% 0.16/5.73 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.16/5.73 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Generated clauses : 139
% 0.16/5.73 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 134
% 0.16/5.73 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Paramodulations : 137
% 0.16/5.73 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.16/5.73 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.73 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.73 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.73 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.73 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.73 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.73 % Current number of processed clauses : 234
% 0.16/5.73 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 154
% 0.16/5.73 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/5.73 % Non-unit-clauses : 79
% 0.16/5.73 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65
% 0.16/5.73 % ...number of literals in the above : 260
% 0.16/5.73 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.16/5.73 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1873
% 0.16/5.73 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1621
% 0.16/5.73 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.16/5.73 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 87
% 0.16/5.73 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/5.73 % Termbank termtop insertions : 50756
% 0.16/5.73 % Search garbage collected termcells : 38941
% 0.16/5.73
% 0.16/5.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.73 % User time : 0.081 s
% 0.16/5.73 % System time : 0.065 s
% 0.16/5.73 % Total time : 0.146 s
% 0.16/5.73 % Maximum resident set size: 45216 pages
% 0.16/5.73
% 0.16/5.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.73 % User time : 0.167 s
% 0.16/5.73 % System time : 0.089 s
% 0.16/5.73 % Total time : 0.256 s
% 0.16/5.73 % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 0.16/5.73 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------