%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+23 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.29s 2.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 29 RR)
% Number of literals : 71 ( 0 equ; 50 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_906,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_906) ).
cnf(i_0_391,hypothesis,
val(c203,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_391) ).
cnf(i_0_392,hypothesis,
sub(c203,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_392) ).
cnf(i_0_395,hypothesis,
sub(c196,kolosseum_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_395) ).
cnf(i_0_393,hypothesis,
sub(c202,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_393) ).
cnf(i_0_394,hypothesis,
attr(c202,c203),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_394) ).
cnf(i_0_773,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_773) ).
cnf(i_0_774,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_774) ).
cnf(i_0_775,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_775) ).
cnf(i_0_390,hypothesis,
in(c205,c202),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_390) ).
cnf(i_0_396,hypothesis,
loc(c196,c205),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v6k5wshv/lgb.p',i_0_396) ).
cnf(c_0_918,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_906 ).
cnf(c_0_919,hypothesis,
val(c203,rom_0),
i_0_391 ).
cnf(c_0_920,hypothesis,
sub(c203,name_1_1),
i_0_392 ).
cnf(c_0_921,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c203)
| ~ scar(X3,X1)
| ~ loc(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_918,c_0_919]),c_0_920])]) ).
cnf(c_0_922,hypothesis,
sub(c196,kolosseum_1_1),
i_0_395 ).
cnf(c_0_923,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c203)
| ~ scar(X2,c196)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_921,c_0_922]) ).
cnf(c_0_924,hypothesis,
sub(c202,stadt__1_1),
i_0_393 ).
cnf(c_0_925,hypothesis,
attr(c202,c203),
i_0_394 ).
cnf(c_0_926,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ scar(X1,c196)
| ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X2,c202) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_923,c_0_924]),c_0_925])]) ).
cnf(c_0_927,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_773 ).
cnf(c_0_928,plain,
( ~ scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),c196)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X3,c202) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_926,c_0_927]) ).
cnf(c_0_929,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_774 ).
cnf(c_0_930,plain,
( ~ loc(esk27_2(c196,X1),X2)
| ~ loc(c196,X1)
| ~ in(X2,c202) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_928,c_0_929]) ).
cnf(c_0_931,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_775 ).
cnf(c_0_932,plain,
( ~ loc(c196,X1)
| ~ in(X1,c202) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_930,c_0_931]) ).
cnf(c_0_933,hypothesis,
in(c205,c202),
i_0_390 ).
cnf(c_0_934,hypothesis,
loc(c196,c205),
i_0_396 ).
cnf(c_0_935,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_932,c_0_933]),c_0_934])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : CSR114+23 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.07/0.26 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.07/0.26 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 19:04:54 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.33 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.10/0.42 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.10/0.42 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.10/0.42 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.29/2.28 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.29/2.28 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.29/2.28 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.29/2.28 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.29/2.28 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 4.29/2.28 #
% 4.29/2.28 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 4.29/2.28 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.29/2.28
% 4.29/2.28 # Proof found!
% 4.29/2.28 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.29/2.28 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.29/2.28 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.29/2.28
% 4.29/2.28 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.29/2.28 # User time : 0.035 s
% 4.29/2.28 # System time : 0.005 s
% 4.29/2.28 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 4.29/2.28 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 4.29/2.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------