%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+25 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.51s 2.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 29 RR)
% Number of literals : 71 ( 0 equ; 50 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_750,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_750) ).
cnf(i_0_261,hypothesis,
val(c13132,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_261) ).
cnf(i_0_262,hypothesis,
sub(c13132,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_262) ).
cnf(i_0_265,hypothesis,
sub(c13125,kolosseum_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_265) ).
cnf(i_0_263,hypothesis,
sub(c13131,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_263) ).
cnf(i_0_264,hypothesis,
attr(c13131,c13132),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_264) ).
cnf(i_0_617,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_617) ).
cnf(i_0_618,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_618) ).
cnf(i_0_619,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_619) ).
cnf(i_0_260,hypothesis,
in(c13134,c13131),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_260) ).
cnf(i_0_266,hypothesis,
loc(c13125,c13134),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgyf4heu/lgb.p',i_0_266) ).
cnf(c_0_762,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_750 ).
cnf(c_0_763,hypothesis,
val(c13132,rom_0),
i_0_261 ).
cnf(c_0_764,hypothesis,
sub(c13132,name_1_1),
i_0_262 ).
cnf(c_0_765,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c13132)
| ~ scar(X3,X1)
| ~ loc(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_762,c_0_763]),c_0_764])]) ).
cnf(c_0_766,hypothesis,
sub(c13125,kolosseum_1_1),
i_0_265 ).
cnf(c_0_767,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c13132)
| ~ scar(X2,c13125)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_765,c_0_766]) ).
cnf(c_0_768,hypothesis,
sub(c13131,stadt__1_1),
i_0_263 ).
cnf(c_0_769,hypothesis,
attr(c13131,c13132),
i_0_264 ).
cnf(c_0_770,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ scar(X1,c13125)
| ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X2,c13131) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_767,c_0_768]),c_0_769])]) ).
cnf(c_0_771,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_617 ).
cnf(c_0_772,plain,
( ~ scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),c13125)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X3,c13131) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_770,c_0_771]) ).
cnf(c_0_773,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_618 ).
cnf(c_0_774,plain,
( ~ loc(esk27_2(c13125,X1),X2)
| ~ loc(c13125,X1)
| ~ in(X2,c13131) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_772,c_0_773]) ).
cnf(c_0_775,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_619 ).
cnf(c_0_776,plain,
( ~ loc(c13125,X1)
| ~ in(X1,c13131) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_774,c_0_775]) ).
cnf(c_0_777,hypothesis,
in(c13134,c13131),
i_0_260 ).
cnf(c_0_778,hypothesis,
loc(c13125,c13134),
i_0_266 ).
cnf(c_0_779,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_776,c_0_777]),c_0_778])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR114+25 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 03:46:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.39/0.61 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.39/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.39/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.51/2.84 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.51/2.84 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.51/2.84 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.51/2.84 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.51/2.84 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.51/2.84 #
% 8.51/2.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 8.51/2.84 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.51/2.84
% 8.51/2.84 # Proof found!
% 8.51/2.84 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.51/2.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.51/2.84 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.51/2.84
% 8.51/2.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.51/2.84 # User time : 0.049 s
% 8.51/2.84 # System time : 0.010 s
% 8.51/2.84 # Total time : 0.059 s
% 8.51/2.84 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.51/2.84
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------