%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+27 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.61s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 186 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 105 ( 8 avg)
% Number of connectives : 209 ( 46 ~; 38 |; 124 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 105 ( 9 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 17 ( 16 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 33 ( 33 usr; 32 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 0 sgn 9 !; 11 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_004_qapw_90,conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( val(X2,rom_0)
& subs(X5,stehen_1_1)
& sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
& sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& scar(X5,X4)
& loc(X5,X3)
& attr(X1,X2)
& in(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_004_qapw_90) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_90,hypothesis,
( sort(rom_0,fe)
& varia(name_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(name_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(name_1_1,one)
& gener(name_1_1,ge)
& fact(name_1_1,real)
& etype(name_1_1,int0)
& card(name_1_1,int1)
& sort(name_1_1,na)
& varia(stadt__1_1,varia_c)
& refer(stadt__1_1,refer_c)
& quant(stadt__1_1,one)
& gener(stadt__1_1,ge)
& fact(stadt__1_1,real)
& etype(stadt__1_1,int0)
& card(stadt__1_1,int1)
& sort(stadt__1_1,io)
& sort(stadt__1_1,d)
& varia(c32,varia_c)
& refer(c32,indet)
& quant(c32,one)
& gener(c32,sp)
& fact(c32,real)
& etype(c32,int0)
& card(c32,int1)
& sort(c32,na)
& varia(c31,con)
& refer(c31,det)
& quant(c31,one)
& gener(c31,sp)
& fact(c31,real)
& etype(c31,int0)
& card(c31,int1)
& sort(c31,io)
& sort(c31,d)
& varia(kolosseum_1_1,con)
& refer(kolosseum_1_1,det)
& quant(kolosseum_1_1,one)
& gener(kolosseum_1_1,sp)
& fact(kolosseum_1_1,real)
& etype(kolosseum_1_1,int0)
& card(kolosseum_1_1,int1)
& sort(kolosseum_1_1,d)
& varia(c34,con)
& refer(c34,det)
& quant(c34,one)
& gener(c34,sp)
& fact(c34,real)
& etype(c34,int0)
& card(c34,int1)
& sort(c34,l)
& varia(c25,con)
& refer(c25,det)
& quant(c25,one)
& gener(c25,sp)
& fact(c25,real)
& etype(c25,int0)
& card(c25,int1)
& sort(c25,d)
& varia(konzert__1_1,varia_c)
& refer(konzert__1_1,refer_c)
& quant(konzert__1_1,one)
& gener(konzert__1_1,ge)
& fact(konzert__1_1,real)
& etype(konzert__1_1,int0)
& card(konzert__1_1,int1)
& sort(konzert__1_1,io)
& sort(konzert__1_1,d)
& sort(konzert__1_1,ad)
& varia(c35,con)
& refer(c35,det)
& quant(c35,one)
& gener(c35,sp)
& fact(c35,real)
& etype(c35,int0)
& card(c35,int1)
& sort(c35,l)
& gener(aufnehmen_1_1,ge)
& fact(aufnehmen_1_1,real)
& sort(aufnehmen_1_1,dn)
& varia(c21,con)
& refer(c21,det)
& quant(c21,one)
& gener(c21,sp)
& fact(c21,real)
& etype(c21,int0)
& card(c21,int1)
& sort(c21,io)
& sort(c21,d)
& sort(c21,ad)
& gener(c16,sp)
& fact(c16,real)
& sort(c16,dn)
& in(c35,c25)
& in(c34,c31)
& val(c32,rom_0)
& sub(c32,name_1_1)
& sub(c31,stadt__1_1)
& attr(c31,c32)
& sub(c25,kolosseum_1_1)
& loc(c25,c34)
& sub(c21,konzert__1_1)
& loc(c21,c35)
& subs(c16,aufnehmen_1_1)
& obj(c16,c21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_90) ).
fof(loc__stehen_1_1_loc,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( loc(X1,X2)
=> ? [X3] :
( subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
& scar(X3,X1)
& loc(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',loc__stehen_1_1_loc) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( val(X2,rom_0)
& subs(X5,stehen_1_1)
& sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
& sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& scar(X5,X4)
& loc(X5,X3)
& attr(X1,X2)
& in(X3,X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_004_qapw_90]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
( ~ val(X9,rom_0)
| ~ subs(X12,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X11,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,stadt__1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,name_1_1)
| ~ scar(X12,X11)
| ~ loc(X12,X10)
| ~ attr(X8,X9)
| ~ in(X10,X8) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ val(X3,rom_0)
| ~ subs(X4,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,name_1_1)
| ~ scar(X4,X5)
| ~ loc(X4,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
val(c32,rom_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
sub(c32,name_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,c32)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
attr(c31,c32),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
sub(c31,stadt__1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X3,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X2,X1)
| ~ scar(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X1,c31) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
in(c34,c31),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_90]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X54,X55] :
( ( ~ loc(X54,X55)
| subs(esk12_2(X54,X55),stehen_1_1) )
& ( ~ loc(X54,X55)
| scar(esk12_2(X54,X55),X54) )
& ( ~ loc(X54,X55)
| loc(esk12_2(X54,X55),X55) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[loc__stehen_1_1_loc])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,c34)
| ~ scar(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| scar(esk12_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| subs(esk12_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(esk12_2(X1,X2),c34) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| loc(esk12_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,c34) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
loc(c25,c34),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
sub(c25,kolosseum_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR114+27 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:05:04 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.19 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.61/1.19 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.61/1.19 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 156837 completed with status 0
% 1.61/1.19 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 1.61/1.19 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.61/1.19 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.61/1.19 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.61/1.19 % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.61/1.19 % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.61/1.19 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 156844 completed with status 0
% 1.61/1.19 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.61/1.19 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.61/1.19 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.61/1.19 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.61/1.19 % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.61/1.19 % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.61/1.19 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.61/1.19 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 1.61/1.19 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.61/1.19
% 1.61/1.19 % Proof found!
% 1.61/1.19 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.61/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.61/1.20 % Parsed axioms : 10189
% 1.61/1.20 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9952
% 1.61/1.20 % Initial clauses : 497
% 1.61/1.20 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Initial clauses in saturation : 497
% 1.61/1.20 % Processed clauses : 1032
% 1.61/1.20 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % ...subsumed : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % ...remaining for further processing : 1032
% 1.61/1.20 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 1.61/1.20 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Generated clauses : 692
% 1.61/1.20 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 629
% 1.61/1.20 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 1.61/1.20 % Paramodulations : 692
% 1.61/1.20 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % NegExts : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 1.61/1.20 % ...of those cached : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.61/1.20 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.61/1.20 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.61/1.20 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.61/1.20 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.61/1.20 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.61/1.20 % Current number of processed clauses : 534
% 1.61/1.20 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 270
% 1.61/1.20 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Non-unit-clauses : 264
% 1.61/1.20 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 588
% 1.61/1.20 % ...number of literals in the above : 2073
% 1.61/1.20 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Current number of archived clauses : 498
% 1.61/1.20 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 40903
% 1.61/1.20 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21946
% 1.61/1.20 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 1.61/1.20 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 261
% 1.61/1.20 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.61/1.20 % Termbank termtop insertions : 77483
% 1.61/1.20 % Search garbage collected termcells : 40755
% 1.61/1.20
% 1.61/1.20 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.61/1.20 % User time : 0.165 s
% 1.61/1.20 % System time : 0.103 s
% 1.61/1.20 % Total time : 0.267 s
% 1.61/1.20 % Maximum resident set size: 49996 pages
% 1.61/1.20
% 1.61/1.20 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.61/1.20 % User time : 0.633 s
% 1.61/1.20 % System time : 0.396 s
% 1.61/1.20 % Total time : 1.029 s
% 1.61/1.20 % Maximum resident set size: 14080 pages
% 1.61/1.20 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------