↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR114+28 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.51s 1.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  210 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :  134 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  228 (  43   ~;  34   |; 149   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :  134 (  10 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   19 (  18 usr;   1 prp; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   44 (  44 usr;  42 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (  12 sgn  20   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_004_qapw_93,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( val(X2,rom_0)
      & sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
      & sub(X2,name_1_1)
      & scar(X4,X3)
      & attr(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_004_qapw_93) ).

fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_93,hypothesis,
    ( varia(c895,varia_c)
    & refer(c895,refer_c)
    & quant(c895,quant_c)
    & gener(c895,gener_c)
    & fact(c895,real)
    & etype(c895,etype_c)
    & card(c895,card_c)
    & sort(c895,ent)
    & sort(rom_0,fe)
    & varia(name_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(name_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(name_1_1,one)
    & gener(name_1_1,ge)
    & fact(name_1_1,real)
    & etype(name_1_1,int0)
    & card(name_1_1,int1)
    & sort(name_1_1,na)
    & varia(stadt__1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(stadt__1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(stadt__1_1,one)
    & gener(stadt__1_1,ge)
    & fact(stadt__1_1,real)
    & etype(stadt__1_1,int0)
    & card(stadt__1_1,int1)
    & sort(stadt__1_1,io)
    & sort(stadt__1_1,d)
    & varia(c621,varia_c)
    & refer(c621,indet)
    & quant(c621,one)
    & gener(c621,sp)
    & fact(c621,real)
    & etype(c621,int0)
    & card(c621,int1)
    & sort(c621,na)
    & varia(c620,con)
    & refer(c620,det)
    & quant(c620,one)
    & gener(c620,sp)
    & fact(c620,real)
    & etype(c620,int0)
    & card(c620,int1)
    & sort(c620,io)
    & sort(c620,d)
    & varia(kolosseum_1_1,con)
    & refer(kolosseum_1_1,det)
    & quant(kolosseum_1_1,one)
    & gener(kolosseum_1_1,sp)
    & fact(kolosseum_1_1,real)
    & etype(kolosseum_1_1,int0)
    & card(kolosseum_1_1,int1)
    & sort(kolosseum_1_1,d)
    & varia(c614,con)
    & refer(c614,det)
    & quant(c614,one)
    & gener(c614,sp)
    & fact(c614,real)
    & etype(c614,int0)
    & card(c614,int1)
    & sort(c614,d)
    & varia(sich_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(sich_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(sich_1_1,one)
    & gener(sich_1_1,gener_c)
    & fact(sich_1_1,real)
    & etype(sich_1_1,int0)
    & card(sich_1_1,int1)
    & sort(sich_1_1,o)
    & varia(c609,varia_c)
    & refer(c609,refer_c)
    & quant(c609,one)
    & gener(c609,gener_c)
    & fact(c609,real)
    & etype(c609,int0)
    & card(c609,int1)
    & sort(c609,o)
    & varia(c582,con)
    & refer(c582,det)
    & quant(c582,one)
    & gener(c582,sp)
    & fact(c582,real)
    & etype(c582,int0)
    & card(c582,int1)
    & sort(c582,d)
    & varia(architektur_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(architektur_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(architektur_1_1,one)
    & gener(architektur_1_1,ge)
    & fact(architektur_1_1,real)
    & etype(architektur_1_1,int0)
    & card(architektur_1_1,int1)
    & sort(architektur_1_1,io)
    & varia(c573,con)
    & refer(c573,det)
    & quant(c573,one)
    & gener(c573,sp)
    & fact(c573,real)
    & etype(c573,int0)
    & card(c573,int1)
    & sort(c573,io)
    & varia(fassade_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(fassade_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(fassade_1_1,one)
    & gener(fassade_1_1,ge)
    & fact(fassade_1_1,real)
    & etype(fassade_1_1,int0)
    & card(fassade_1_1,int1)
    & sort(fassade_1_1,d)
    & varia(au__337en_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(au__337en_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(au__337en_1_1,one)
    & gener(au__337en_1_1,gener_c)
    & fact(au__337en_1_1,real)
    & etype(au__337en_1_1,int0)
    & card(au__337en_1_1,int1)
    & sort(au__337en_1_1,l)
    & varia(au__337enfassade_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(au__337enfassade_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(au__337enfassade_1_1,one)
    & gener(au__337enfassade_1_1,ge)
    & fact(au__337enfassade_1_1,real)
    & etype(au__337enfassade_1_1,int0)
    & card(au__337enfassade_1_1,int1)
    & sort(au__337enfassade_1_1,d)
    & tupl_p6(c895,c573,c582,c609,c614,c620)
    & val(c621,rom_0)
    & sub(c621,name_1_1)
    & sub(c620,stadt__1_1)
    & attr(c620,c621)
    & sub(c614,kolosseum_1_1)
    & sub(c609,sich_1_1)
    & sub(c582,au__337enfassade_1_1)
    & sub(c573,architektur_1_1)
    & sub(au__337enfassade_1_1,fassade_1_1)
    & assoc(au__337enfassade_1_1,au__337en_1_1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_93) ).

fof(attr_name__abk__374rzung_stehen_1_b_f__374r,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( sub(X1,X2)
        & member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
        & attr(X3,X1) )
     => ? [X4] :
          ( subs(X4,stehen_1_b)
          & scar(X4,X3)
          & obj(X4,X3)
          & mcont(X4,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',attr_name__abk__374rzung_stehen_1_b_f__374r) ).

fof(member_second,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X1,X3)
     => member(X1,cons(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',member_second) ).

fof(member_first,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',member_first) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( val(X2,rom_0)
        & sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
        & sub(X2,name_1_1)
        & scar(X4,X3)
        & attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_004_qapw_93]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ~ val(X9,rom_0)
      | ~ sub(X8,stadt__1_1)
      | ~ sub(X9,name_1_1)
      | ~ scar(X11,X10)
      | ~ attr(X8,X9) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ val(X2,rom_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
    | ~ scar(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    val(c621,rom_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    sub(c621,name_1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_93]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X370,X371,X372] :
      ( ( ~ sub(X370,X371)
        | ~ member(X371,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
        | ~ attr(X372,X370)
        | subs(esk50_3(X370,X371,X372),stehen_1_b) )
      & ( ~ sub(X370,X371)
        | ~ member(X371,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
        | ~ attr(X372,X370)
        | scar(esk50_3(X370,X371,X372),X372) )
      & ( ~ sub(X370,X371)
        | ~ member(X371,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
        | ~ attr(X372,X370)
        | obj(esk50_3(X370,X371,X372),X372) )
      & ( ~ sub(X370,X371)
        | ~ member(X371,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
        | ~ attr(X372,X370)
        | mcont(esk50_3(X370,X371,X372),X372) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[attr_name__abk__374rzung_stehen_1_b_f__374r])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
    | ~ scar(X2,X3)
    | ~ attr(X1,c621) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    attr(c620,c621),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    sub(c620,stadt__1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_qapw_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | scar(esk50_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    ~ scar(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X288,X289,X290] :
      ( member(X288,cons(X289,X290))
      | ~ member(X288,X290) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[member_second])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
    | ~ sub(X2,X3)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,cons(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
    | ~ sub(X2,X3)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X286,X287] : member(X286,cons(X286,X287)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[member_first]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,cons(name_1_1,nil))
    | ~ sub(X2,X3)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_12]),c_0_9])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CSR114+28 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:03:06 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/1.20  % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.51/1.20  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/1.20  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1370695 completed with status 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 2.51/1.20  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/1.20  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.51/1.20  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 2.51/1.20  % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.51/1.20  % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.51/1.20  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1370703 completed with status 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 2.51/1.20  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/1.20  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.51/1.20  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 2.51/1.20  % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.51/1.20  % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 2.51/1.20  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.20  % Preprocessing time       : 0.028 s
% 2.51/1.20  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.51/1.20  
% 2.51/1.20  % Proof found!
% 2.51/1.20  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.51/1.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.51/1.20  % Parsed axioms                        : 10189
% 2.51/1.20  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 9957
% 2.51/1.20  % Initial clauses                      : 510
% 2.51/1.20  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 510
% 2.51/1.20  % Processed clauses                    : 1211
% 2.51/1.20  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % ...subsumed                          : 55
% 2.51/1.20  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1156
% 2.51/1.20  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Backward-subsumed                    : 18
% 2.51/1.20  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Generated clauses                    : 658
% 2.51/1.20  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 657
% 2.51/1.20  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Paramodulations                      : 658
% 2.51/1.20  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % NegExts                              : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 2.51/1.20  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 2.51/1.20  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.51/1.20  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.51/1.20  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.51/1.20  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.51/1.20  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.51/1.20  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.51/1.20  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.51/1.20  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.51/1.20  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.51/1.20  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.51/1.20  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.51/1.20  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.51/1.20  % Current number of processed clauses  : 628
% 2.51/1.20  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 313
% 2.51/1.20  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.51/1.20  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 2.51/1.20  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 310
% 2.51/1.20  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 466
% 2.51/1.20  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1541
% 2.51/1.20  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Current number of archived clauses   : 528
% 2.51/1.20  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44148
% 2.51/1.20  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21858
% 2.51/1.20  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 41
% 2.51/1.20  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 554
% 2.51/1.20  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.51/1.20  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 77146
% 2.51/1.20  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 40626
% 2.51/1.20  
% 2.51/1.20  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.51/1.20  % User time                : 0.287 s
% 2.51/1.20  % System time              : 0.169 s
% 2.51/1.20  % Total time               : 0.456 s
% 2.51/1.20  % Maximum resident set size: 50192 pages
% 2.51/1.20  
% 2.51/1.20  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.51/1.20  % User time                : 0.961 s
% 2.51/1.20  % System time              : 0.566 s
% 2.51/1.20  % Total time               : 1.527 s
% 2.51/1.20  % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 2.51/1.20  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------