%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+28 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.49s 2.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 48 ( 0 equ; 33 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_668,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X4,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-el5moj_7/lgb.p',i_0_668) ).
cnf(i_0_178,hypothesis,
val(c621,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-el5moj_7/lgb.p',i_0_178) ).
cnf(i_0_179,hypothesis,
sub(c621,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-el5moj_7/lgb.p',i_0_179) ).
cnf(i_0_180,hypothesis,
sub(c620,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-el5moj_7/lgb.p',i_0_180) ).
cnf(i_0_181,hypothesis,
attr(c620,c621),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-el5moj_7/lgb.p',i_0_181) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-el5moj_7/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_539,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-el5moj_7/lgb.p',i_0_539) ).
cnf(i_0_538,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-el5moj_7/lgb.p',i_0_538) ).
cnf(c_0_677,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X4,rom_0) ),
i_0_668 ).
cnf(c_0_678,hypothesis,
val(c621,rom_0),
i_0_178 ).
cnf(c_0_679,hypothesis,
sub(c621,name_1_1),
i_0_179 ).
cnf(c_0_680,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c621)
| ~ scar(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_677,c_0_678]),c_0_679])]) ).
cnf(c_0_681,hypothesis,
sub(c620,stadt__1_1),
i_0_180 ).
cnf(c_0_682,hypothesis,
attr(c620,c621),
i_0_181 ).
cnf(c_0_683,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_684,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_680,c_0_681]),c_0_682])]) ).
cnf(c_0_685,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_683,c_0_684]) ).
cnf(c_0_686,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
i_0_539 ).
cnf(c_0_687,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_685,c_0_686]) ).
cnf(c_0_688,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(name_1_1,nil))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_687,c_0_686]) ).
cnf(c_0_689,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_538 ).
cnf(c_0_690,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_688,c_0_689]) ).
cnf(c_0_691,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_690,c_0_682]),c_0_679])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : CSR114+28 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 06:04:29 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.58 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.49/2.51 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.49/2.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.49/2.51 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.49/2.51 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 6.49/2.51 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 6.49/2.51 #
% 6.49/2.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 6.49/2.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.49/2.51
% 6.49/2.51 # Proof found!
% 6.49/2.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.49/2.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.49/2.51 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.49/2.51
% 6.49/2.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.49/2.51 # User time : 0.048 s
% 6.49/2.51 # System time : 0.006 s
% 6.49/2.51 # Total time : 0.054 s
% 6.49/2.51 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 6.49/2.51
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------