%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+29 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.29s 2.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 66 ( 0 equ; 45 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_792,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_792) ).
cnf(i_0_283,hypothesis,
val(c148,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_283) ).
cnf(i_0_284,hypothesis,
sub(c148,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_284) ).
cnf(i_0_660,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_660) ).
cnf(i_0_659,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_659) ).
cnf(i_0_661,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_661) ).
cnf(i_0_288,hypothesis,
loc(c140,c169),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_288) ).
cnf(i_0_287,hypothesis,
sub(c140,kolosseum_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_287) ).
cnf(i_0_280,hypothesis,
in(c169,c147),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_280) ).
cnf(i_0_286,hypothesis,
attr(c147,c148),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_286) ).
cnf(i_0_285,hypothesis,
sub(c147,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e_90yxq0/input.p',i_0_285) ).
cnf(c_0_804,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_792 ).
cnf(c_0_805,hypothesis,
val(c148,rom_0),
i_0_283 ).
cnf(c_0_806,hypothesis,
sub(c148,name_1_1),
i_0_284 ).
cnf(c_0_807,negated_conjecture,
( ~ attr(X1,c148)
| ~ scar(X2,X3)
| ~ sub(X3,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(X2,X4)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ in(X4,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_804,c_0_805]),c_0_806])]) ).
cnf(c_0_808,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_660 ).
cnf(c_0_809,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_659 ).
cnf(c_0_810,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c148)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_807,c_0_808]),c_0_809]) ).
cnf(c_0_811,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_661 ).
cnf(c_0_812,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c148)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_810,c_0_811]) ).
cnf(c_0_813,hypothesis,
loc(c140,c169),
i_0_288 ).
cnf(c_0_814,hypothesis,
sub(c140,kolosseum_1_1),
i_0_287 ).
cnf(c_0_815,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c148)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ in(c169,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_812,c_0_813]),c_0_814])]) ).
cnf(c_0_816,hypothesis,
in(c169,c147),
i_0_280 ).
cnf(c_0_817,hypothesis,
attr(c147,c148),
i_0_286 ).
cnf(c_0_818,hypothesis,
sub(c147,stadt__1_1),
i_0_285 ).
cnf(c_0_819,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_815,c_0_816]),c_0_817]),c_0_818])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR114+29 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 03:15:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.29/2.69 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.29/2.69 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.29/2.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 8.29/2.69
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof found!
% 8.29/2.69 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.29/2.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object total steps : 27
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 8.29/2.69 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 8.29/2.69 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.29/2.69 # Parsed axioms : 812
% 8.29/2.69 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Initial clauses : 812
% 8.29/2.69 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Initial clauses in saturation : 812
% 8.29/2.69 # Processed clauses : 825
% 8.29/2.69 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # ...subsumed : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # ...remaining for further processing : 825
% 8.29/2.69 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Generated clauses : 1742
% 8.29/2.69 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1741
% 8.29/2.69 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 8.29/2.69 # Paramodulations : 1742
% 8.29/2.69 # Factorizations : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Current number of processed clauses : 825
% 8.29/2.69 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 506
% 8.29/2.69 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Non-unit-clauses : 319
% 8.29/2.69 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1728
% 8.29/2.69 # ...number of literals in the above : 5427
% 8.29/2.69 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24835
% 8.29/2.69 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8911
% 8.29/2.69 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 8.29/2.69 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1601
% 8.29/2.69 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.29/2.69 # Termbank termtop insertions : 33833
% 8.29/2.69
% 8.29/2.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.29/2.69 # User time : 0.053 s
% 8.29/2.69 # System time : 0.004 s
% 8.29/2.69 # Total time : 0.057 s
% 8.29/2.69 # ...preprocessing : 0.022 s
% 8.29/2.69 # ...main loop : 0.036 s
% 8.29/2.69 # Maximum resident set size: 10036 pages
% 8.29/2.69
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------