%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 5.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 64 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 58 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 60 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 57 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 58 ( 10 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 27 ( 27 usr; 27 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn 2 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] : attr(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526,hypothesis,
( card(c4,int11)
& sort(c4,nu)
& varia(monat_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(monat_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(monat_1_1,quant_c)
& gener(monat_1_1,ge)
& fact(monat_1_1,real)
& etype(monat_1_1,etype_c)
& card(monat_1_1,card_c)
& sort(monat_1_1,ta)
& sort(monat_1_1,oa)
& sort(monat_1_1,me)
& card(c3,int9)
& sort(c3,nu)
& varia(tag_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(tag_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(tag_1_1,quant_c)
& gener(tag_1_1,ge)
& fact(tag_1_1,real)
& etype(tag_1_1,etype_c)
& card(tag_1_1,card_c)
& sort(tag_1_1,ta)
& sort(tag_1_1,oa)
& sort(tag_1_1,me)
& varia(c7,varia_c)
& refer(c7,refer_c)
& quant(c7,quant_c)
& gener(c7,sp)
& fact(c7,real)
& etype(c7,etype_c)
& card(c7,card_c)
& sort(c7,ta)
& sort(c7,oa)
& sort(c7,me)
& varia(c6,varia_c)
& refer(c6,refer_c)
& quant(c6,quant_c)
& gener(c6,sp)
& fact(c6,real)
& etype(c6,etype_c)
& card(c6,card_c)
& sort(c6,ta)
& sort(c6,oa)
& sort(c6,me)
& varia(c5,con)
& refer(c5,det)
& quant(c5,one)
& gener(c5,sp)
& fact(c5,real)
& etype(c5,int0)
& card(c5,int1)
& sort(c5,t)
& val(c7,c4)
& sub(c7,monat_1_1)
& val(c6,c3)
& sub(c6,tag_1_1)
& attr(c5,c7)
& attr(c5,c6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] : attr(X1,X2),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X8,X9] : ~ attr(X8,X9),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,hypothesis,
attr(c5,c6),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR114+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.37 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:05:34 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.68 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.68 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.68 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % new_bool_1 with pid 2048341 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/5.68 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.68 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.68 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.68 % Search class: FHUNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.68 % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.68 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2048344 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/5.68 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.68 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.68 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.68 % Search class: FHUNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.68 % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.68 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.68 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.68 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/5.68
% 0.15/5.68 % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.68 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/5.68 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.68 % Parsed axioms : 10189
% 0.15/5.68 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 10139
% 0.15/5.68 % Initial clauses : 119
% 0.15/5.68 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Initial clauses in saturation : 119
% 0.15/5.68 % Processed clauses : 75
% 0.15/5.68 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % ...remaining for further processing : 75
% 0.15/5.68 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.15/5.68 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.68 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.68 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.68 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.68 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.68 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.68 % Current number of processed clauses : 73
% 0.15/5.68 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 72
% 0.15/5.68 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/5.68 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44
% 0.15/5.68 % ...number of literals in the above : 144
% 0.15/5.68 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.15/5.68 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.68 % Termbank termtop insertions : 47399
% 0.15/5.68 % Search garbage collected termcells : 38900
% 0.15/5.68
% 0.15/5.68 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.68 % User time : 0.054 s
% 0.15/5.68 % System time : 0.057 s
% 0.15/5.68 % Total time : 0.111 s
% 0.15/5.68 % Maximum resident set size: 45196 pages
% 0.15/5.68
% 0.15/5.68 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.68 % User time : 0.145 s
% 0.15/5.68 % System time : 0.078 s
% 0.15/5.68 % Total time : 0.223 s
% 0.15/5.68 % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 0.15/5.68 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------