%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR114+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:03:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.23s 2.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 64 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 58 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 60 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 57 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 58 ( 10 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 27 ( 27 usr; 27 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn 2 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] : attr(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526,hypothesis,
( attr(c5,c6)
& attr(c5,c7)
& sub(c6,tag_1_1)
& val(c6,c3)
& sub(c7,monat_1_1)
& val(c7,c4)
& sort(c5,t)
& card(c5,int1)
& etype(c5,int0)
& fact(c5,real)
& gener(c5,sp)
& quant(c5,one)
& refer(c5,det)
& varia(c5,con)
& sort(c6,me)
& sort(c6,oa)
& sort(c6,ta)
& card(c6,card_c)
& etype(c6,etype_c)
& fact(c6,real)
& gener(c6,sp)
& quant(c6,quant_c)
& refer(c6,refer_c)
& varia(c6,varia_c)
& sort(c7,me)
& sort(c7,oa)
& sort(c7,ta)
& card(c7,card_c)
& etype(c7,etype_c)
& fact(c7,real)
& gener(c7,sp)
& quant(c7,quant_c)
& refer(c7,refer_c)
& varia(c7,varia_c)
& sort(tag_1_1,me)
& sort(tag_1_1,oa)
& sort(tag_1_1,ta)
& card(tag_1_1,card_c)
& etype(tag_1_1,etype_c)
& fact(tag_1_1,real)
& gener(tag_1_1,ge)
& quant(tag_1_1,quant_c)
& refer(tag_1_1,refer_c)
& varia(tag_1_1,varia_c)
& sort(c3,nu)
& card(c3,int9)
& sort(monat_1_1,me)
& sort(monat_1_1,oa)
& sort(monat_1_1,ta)
& card(monat_1_1,card_c)
& etype(monat_1_1,etype_c)
& fact(monat_1_1,real)
& gener(monat_1_1,ge)
& quant(monat_1_1,quant_c)
& refer(monat_1_1,refer_c)
& varia(monat_1_1,varia_c)
& sort(c4,nu)
& card(c4,int11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] : attr(X1,X2),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X3,X4] : ~ attr(X3,X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,hypothesis,
attr(c5,c6),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_526]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CSR114+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 12:06:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.23/2.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 1.23/2.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 1.23/2.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.162 s
% 1.23/2.42
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof found!
% 1.23/2.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.23/2.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object total steps : 7
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 1.23/2.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.23/2.42 # Parsed axioms : 10189
% 1.23/2.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 10152
% 1.23/2.42 # Initial clauses : 101
% 1.23/2.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 101
% 1.23/2.42 # Processed clauses : 7
% 1.23/2.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 1.23/2.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Generated clauses : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Paramodulations : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 1.23/2.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 1.23/2.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.23/2.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 1.23/2.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 94
% 1.23/2.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 159
% 1.23/2.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 1.23/2.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 1.23/2.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.23/2.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 45668
% 1.23/2.42
% 1.23/2.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.23/2.42 # User time : 0.134 s
% 1.23/2.42 # System time : 0.029 s
% 1.23/2.42 # Total time : 0.163 s
% 1.23/2.42 # Maximum resident set size: 44696 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------