%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 5.93s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 182 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 106 ( 7 avg)
% Number of connectives : 200 ( 43 ~; 34 |; 121 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 106 ( 9 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 18 ( 17 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 46 ( 46 usr; 44 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 12 sgn 20 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_004_mira_news_550,conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( val(X2,rom_0)
& sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& scar(X4,X3)
& attr(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_004_mira_news_550) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_550,hypothesis,
( varia(c59,varia_c)
& refer(c59,refer_c)
& quant(c59,quant_c)
& gener(c59,gener_c)
& fact(c59,real)
& etype(c59,etype_c)
& card(c59,card_c)
& sort(c59,ent)
& card(c17,int3)
& sort(c17,nu)
& varia(monat_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(monat_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(monat_1_1,quant_c)
& gener(monat_1_1,ge)
& fact(monat_1_1,real)
& etype(monat_1_1,etype_c)
& card(monat_1_1,card_c)
& sort(monat_1_1,ta)
& sort(monat_1_1,oa)
& sort(monat_1_1,me)
& card(c16,int6)
& sort(c16,nu)
& varia(tag_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(tag_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(tag_1_1,quant_c)
& gener(tag_1_1,ge)
& fact(tag_1_1,real)
& etype(tag_1_1,etype_c)
& card(tag_1_1,card_c)
& sort(tag_1_1,ta)
& sort(tag_1_1,oa)
& sort(tag_1_1,me)
& varia(c20,varia_c)
& refer(c20,refer_c)
& quant(c20,quant_c)
& gener(c20,sp)
& fact(c20,real)
& etype(c20,etype_c)
& card(c20,card_c)
& sort(c20,ta)
& sort(c20,oa)
& sort(c20,me)
& varia(c19,varia_c)
& refer(c19,refer_c)
& quant(c19,quant_c)
& gener(c19,sp)
& fact(c19,real)
& etype(c19,etype_c)
& card(c19,card_c)
& sort(c19,ta)
& sort(c19,oa)
& sort(c19,me)
& varia(c18,con)
& refer(c18,det)
& quant(c18,one)
& gener(c18,sp)
& fact(c18,real)
& etype(c18,int0)
& card(c18,int1)
& sort(c18,t)
& sort(rom_0,fe)
& varia(name_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(name_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(name_1_1,one)
& gener(name_1_1,ge)
& fact(name_1_1,real)
& etype(name_1_1,int0)
& card(name_1_1,int1)
& sort(name_1_1,na)
& varia(stadt__1_1,varia_c)
& refer(stadt__1_1,refer_c)
& quant(stadt__1_1,one)
& gener(stadt__1_1,ge)
& fact(stadt__1_1,real)
& etype(stadt__1_1,int0)
& card(stadt__1_1,int1)
& sort(stadt__1_1,io)
& sort(stadt__1_1,d)
& varia(c12,varia_c)
& refer(c12,indet)
& quant(c12,one)
& gener(c12,sp)
& fact(c12,real)
& etype(c12,int0)
& card(c12,int1)
& sort(c12,na)
& varia(c11,con)
& refer(c11,det)
& quant(c11,one)
& gener(c11,sp)
& fact(c11,real)
& etype(c11,int0)
& card(c11,int1)
& sort(c11,io)
& sort(c11,d)
& tupl(c59,c11,c18)
& val(c20,c17)
& sub(c20,monat_1_1)
& val(c19,c16)
& sub(c19,tag_1_1)
& attr(c18,c20)
& attr(c18,c19)
& val(c12,rom_0)
& sub(c12,name_1_1)
& sub(c11,stadt__1_1)
& attr(c11,c12) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_550) ).
fof(attr_name__abk__374rzung_stehen_1_b_f__374r,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( sub(X1,X2)
& member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
& attr(X3,X1) )
=> ? [X4] :
( subs(X4,stehen_1_b)
& scar(X4,X3)
& obj(X4,X3)
& mcont(X4,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',attr_name__abk__374rzung_stehen_1_b_f__374r) ).
fof(member_second,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( member(X1,X3)
=> member(X1,cons(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',member_second) ).
fof(member_first,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',member_first) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( val(X2,rom_0)
& sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& scar(X4,X3)
& attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_004_mira_news_550]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11] :
( ~ val(X9,rom_0)
| ~ sub(X8,stadt__1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,name_1_1)
| ~ scar(X11,X10)
| ~ attr(X8,X9) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ val(X2,rom_0)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
val(c12,rom_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_550]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
sub(c12,name_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_550]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X313,X314,X315] :
( ( ~ sub(X313,X314)
| ~ member(X314,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ attr(X315,X313)
| subs(esk38_3(X313,X314,X315),stehen_1_b) )
& ( ~ sub(X313,X314)
| ~ member(X314,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ attr(X315,X313)
| scar(esk38_3(X313,X314,X315),X315) )
& ( ~ sub(X313,X314)
| ~ member(X314,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ attr(X315,X313)
| obj(esk38_3(X313,X314,X315),X315) )
& ( ~ sub(X313,X314)
| ~ member(X314,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ attr(X315,X313)
| mcont(esk38_3(X313,X314,X315),X315) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[attr_name__abk__374rzung_stehen_1_b_f__374r])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ scar(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X1,c12) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
attr(c11,c12),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_550]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
sub(c11,stadt__1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_news_550]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| scar(esk38_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X269,X270,X271] :
( member(X269,cons(X270,X271))
| ~ member(X269,X271) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[member_second])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ member(X3,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ sub(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,cons(X3,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ member(X3,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
| ~ sub(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X267,X268] : member(X267,cons(X267,X268)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[member_first]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ member(X3,cons(name_1_1,nil))
| ~ sub(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_12]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR114+8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.44 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.16/5.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/5.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/5.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/5.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/5.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/5.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/5.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:05:41 UTC 2026
% 0.16/5.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/5.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/5.93 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.21/5.93 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.93 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % sh5l with pid 2856277 completed with status 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/5.93 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.93 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.21/5.93 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/5.93 % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.93 % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.93 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2856280 completed with status 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.21/5.93 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.93 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.21/5.93 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/5.93 % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.93 % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.93 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/5.93 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.93 % Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.21/5.93
% 0.21/5.93 % Proof found!
% 0.21/5.93 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/5.93 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/5.93 % Parsed axioms : 10189
% 0.21/5.93 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9973
% 0.21/5.93 % Initial clauses : 466
% 0.21/5.93 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Initial clauses in saturation : 466
% 0.21/5.93 % Processed clauses : 1728
% 0.21/5.93 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % ...subsumed : 231
% 0.21/5.93 % ...remaining for further processing : 1497
% 0.21/5.93 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Backward-subsumed : 276
% 0.21/5.93 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Generated clauses : 2324
% 0.21/5.93 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2219
% 0.21/5.93 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Paramodulations : 2324
% 0.21/5.93 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % NegExts : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.21/5.93 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.21/5.93 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.93 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.93 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.93 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.93 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.93 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.93 % Current number of processed clauses : 1221
% 0.21/5.93 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 286
% 0.21/5.93 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.21/5.93 % Non-unit-clauses : 924
% 0.21/5.93 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 909
% 0.21/5.93 % ...number of literals in the above : 4210
% 0.21/5.93 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Current number of archived clauses : 276
% 0.21/5.93 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 345786
% 0.21/5.93 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 237843
% 0.21/5.93 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 392
% 0.21/5.93 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4488
% 0.21/5.93 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/5.93 % Termbank termtop insertions : 100238
% 0.21/5.93 % Search garbage collected termcells : 40634
% 0.21/5.93
% 0.21/5.93 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/5.93 % User time : 0.196 s
% 0.21/5.93 % System time : 0.105 s
% 0.21/5.93 % Total time : 0.301 s
% 0.21/5.93 % Maximum resident set size: 50180 pages
% 0.21/5.93
% 0.21/5.93 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/5.93 % User time : 0.279 s
% 0.21/5.93 % System time : 0.132 s
% 0.21/5.93 % Total time : 0.411 s
% 0.21/5.93 % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 0.21/5.93 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------