↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+18 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.47s 2.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  19 unt;   0 nHn;  37 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  104 (   0 equ;  77 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;  11 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (  26 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_819,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ val(X4,X7)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ prop(X2,britisch__1_1)
    | ~ has_card_leq(X7,int1994) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_819) ).

cnf(i_0_641,plain,
    ( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ card(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_641) ).

cnf(i_0_324,hypothesis,
    prop(c131,britisch__1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_324) ).

cnf(i_0_678,plain,
    ( obj(esk24_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ loc(X2,X1)
    | ~ has_fact_leq(X2,real) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_678) ).

cnf(i_0_645,plain,
    ( has_fact_leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ fact(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_645) ).

cnf(i_0_237,hypothesis,
    fact(c131,real),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_237) ).

cnf(i_0_777,plain,
    ( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
    | ~ prop(X1,X2)
    | ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_777) ).

cnf(i_0_579,plain,
    state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,grossbritannien_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_579) ).

cnf(i_0_305,hypothesis,
    val(c84,c81),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_305) ).

cnf(i_0_71,hypothesis,
    card(c81,int1994),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_71) ).

cnf(i_0_306,hypothesis,
    sub(c84,jahr__1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_306) ).

cnf(i_0_307,hypothesis,
    attr(c83,c84),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_307) ).

cnf(i_0_325,hypothesis,
    attr(c131,c132),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_325) ).

cnf(i_0_322,hypothesis,
    sub(c132,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fhyeo7c8/input.p',i_0_322) ).

cnf(c_0_834,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ val(X4,X7)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ prop(X2,britisch__1_1)
    | ~ has_card_leq(X7,int1994) ),
    i_0_819 ).

cnf(c_0_835,plain,
    ( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ card(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_641 ).

cnf(c_0_836,plain,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ card(X3,int1994)
    | ~ val(X4,X3)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X7,X4)
    | ~ prop(X2,britisch__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_834,c_0_835]) ).

cnf(c_0_837,hypothesis,
    prop(c131,britisch__1_1),
    i_0_324 ).

cnf(c_0_838,hypothesis,
    ( ~ obj(X1,c131)
    | ~ card(X2,int1994)
    | ~ val(X3,X2)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5)
    | ~ attr(X6,X3)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,jahr__1_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_836,c_0_837]) ).

cnf(c_0_839,plain,
    ( obj(esk24_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ loc(X2,X1)
    | ~ has_fact_leq(X2,real) ),
    i_0_678 ).

cnf(c_0_840,plain,
    ( ~ loc(c131,X1)
    | ~ has_fact_leq(c131,real)
    | ~ card(X2,int1994)
    | ~ val(X3,X2)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5)
    | ~ attr(X6,X3)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,jahr__1_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_838,c_0_839]) ).

cnf(c_0_841,plain,
    ( has_fact_leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ fact(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_645 ).

cnf(c_0_842,hypothesis,
    fact(c131,real),
    i_0_237 ).

cnf(c_0_843,plain,
    ( ~ loc(c131,X1)
    | ~ card(X2,int1994)
    | ~ val(X3,X2)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5)
    | ~ attr(X6,X3)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,jahr__1_1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_840,c_0_841]),c_0_842])]) ).

cnf(c_0_844,plain,
    ( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
    | ~ prop(X1,X2)
    | ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
    i_0_777 ).

cnf(c_0_845,plain,
    ( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
    | ~ card(X3,int1994)
    | ~ val(X4,X3)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X7,X4)
    | ~ prop(c131,X1)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_843,c_0_844]) ).

cnf(c_0_846,plain,
    state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,grossbritannien_0),
    i_0_579 ).

cnf(c_0_847,plain,
    ( ~ card(X1,int1994)
    | ~ val(X2,X1)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X2)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_845,c_0_846]),c_0_837])]) ).

cnf(c_0_848,hypothesis,
    val(c84,c81),
    i_0_305 ).

cnf(c_0_849,hypothesis,
    card(c81,int1994),
    i_0_71 ).

cnf(c_0_850,hypothesis,
    sub(c84,jahr__1_1),
    i_0_306 ).

cnf(c_0_851,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c84)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ sub(X3,name_1_1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_847,c_0_848]),c_0_849]),c_0_850])]) ).

cnf(c_0_852,hypothesis,
    attr(c83,c84),
    i_0_307 ).

cnf(c_0_853,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_851,c_0_852]) ).

cnf(c_0_854,hypothesis,
    attr(c131,c132),
    i_0_325 ).

cnf(c_0_855,hypothesis,
    sub(c132,name_1_1),
    i_0_322 ).

cnf(c_0_856,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_853,c_0_854]),c_0_855])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR115+18 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 07:32:21 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.40/0.61  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.40/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.40/0.61  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.47/2.87  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 8.47/2.87  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.47/2.87  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 8.47/2.87  
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof found!
% 8.47/2.87  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.47/2.87  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object total steps             : 37
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object clause steps            : 23
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object formula steps           : 14
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object conjectures             : 2
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 14
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 14
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object generating inferences   : 9
% 8.47/2.87  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 8.47/2.87  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.47/2.87  # Parsed axioms                        : 839
% 8.47/2.87  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Initial clauses                      : 839
% 8.47/2.87  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 839
% 8.47/2.87  # Processed clauses                    : 870
% 8.47/2.87  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 8.47/2.87  # ...remaining for further processing  : 869
% 8.47/2.87  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Backward-subsumed                    : 17
% 8.47/2.87  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Generated clauses                    : 1793
% 8.47/2.87  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1790
% 8.47/2.87  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 8.47/2.87  # Paramodulations                      : 1793
% 8.47/2.87  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Current number of processed clauses  : 852
% 8.47/2.87  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 537
% 8.47/2.87  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.47/2.87  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 8.47/2.87  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 315
% 8.47/2.87  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1702
% 8.47/2.87  # ...number of literals in the above   : 5393
% 8.47/2.87  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 8.47/2.87  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 27149
% 8.47/2.87  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9695
% 8.47/2.87  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 20
% 8.47/2.87  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2870
% 8.47/2.87  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.47/2.87  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 35027
% 8.47/2.87  
% 8.47/2.87  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.47/2.87  # User time                : 0.060 s
% 8.47/2.87  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 8.47/2.87  # Total time               : 0.068 s
% 8.47/2.87  # ...preprocessing         : 0.025 s
% 8.47/2.87  # ...main loop             : 0.043 s
% 8.47/2.87  # Maximum resident set size: 10236 pages
% 8.47/2.87  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------