↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.41s 2.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  30 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   80 (   0 equ;  61 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (  37 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_752,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X2,X7)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_752) ).

cnf(i_0_256,hypothesis,
    val(c3591,bmw_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_256) ).

cnf(i_0_257,hypothesis,
    sub(c3591,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_257) ).

cnf(i_0_258,hypothesis,
    sub(c3590,firma_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_258) ).

cnf(i_0_259,hypothesis,
    attr(c3590,c3591),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_259) ).

cnf(i_0_731,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_731) ).

cnf(i_0_748,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_748) ).

cnf(i_0_750,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_750) ).

cnf(i_0_749,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_749) ).

cnf(i_0_268,hypothesis,
    attr(c3505,c3506),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kl_axi6q/lgb.p',i_0_268) ).

cnf(c_0_763,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X2,X7)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
    i_0_752 ).

cnf(c_0_764,hypothesis,
    val(c3591,bmw_0),
    i_0_256 ).

cnf(c_0_765,hypothesis,
    sub(c3591,name_1_1),
    i_0_257 ).

cnf(c_0_766,hypothesis,
    ( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X2,c3591)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5)
    | ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_763,c_0_764]),c_0_765])]) ).

cnf(c_0_767,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X1,c3591)
    | ~ attr(X2,c3591)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_766,c_0_764]),c_0_765])]) ).

cnf(c_0_768,hypothesis,
    sub(c3590,firma_1_1),
    i_0_258 ).

cnf(c_0_769,hypothesis,
    attr(c3590,c3591),
    i_0_259 ).

cnf(c_0_770,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c3591)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ obj(X4,c3590) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_767,c_0_768]),c_0_769])]) ).

cnf(c_0_771,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ obj(X3,c3590) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_770,c_0_769]) ).

cnf(c_0_772,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    i_0_731 ).

cnf(c_0_773,plain,
    ( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,c3590)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_771,c_0_772]) ).

cnf(c_0_774,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_748 ).

cnf(c_0_775,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c3590)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_773,c_0_774]) ).

cnf(c_0_776,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_750 ).

cnf(c_0_777,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c3590,X1),X2)
    | ~ sub(c3590,X1)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_775,c_0_776]) ).

cnf(c_0_778,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_749 ).

cnf(c_0_779,plain,
    ( ~ sub(c3590,X1)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_777,c_0_778]) ).

cnf(c_0_780,hypothesis,
    attr(c3505,c3506),
    i_0_268 ).

cnf(c_0_781,hypothesis,
    ~ attr(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_779,c_0_768]) ).

cnf(c_0_782,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_780,c_0_781]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : CSR115+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 15:59:37 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.45/0.63  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/0.63  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.45/0.63  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.45/0.63  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.41/2.68  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.41/2.68  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.41/2.68  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.41/2.68  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.41/2.68  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.41/2.68  #
% 7.41/2.68  # Preprocessing time       : 0.030 s
% 7.41/2.68  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.41/2.68  
% 7.41/2.68  # Proof found!
% 7.41/2.68  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.41/2.68  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.41/2.68  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.41/2.68  
% 7.41/2.68  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.41/2.68  # User time                : 0.058 s
% 7.41/2.68  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.41/2.68  # Total time               : 0.065 s
% 7.41/2.68  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.41/2.68  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------