%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+30 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.56s 0.77s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 178 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 131 ( 10 avg)
% Number of connectives : 188 ( 27 ~; 20 |; 140 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 131 ( 12 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 16 ( 15 usr; 1 prp; 0-6 aty)
% Number of functors : 43 ( 43 usr; 43 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 52 ( 21 sgn 11 !; 14 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1206,conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7] :
( val(X6,X7)
& sub(X6,jahr__1_1)
& has_card_leq(X7,int1994)
& attr(X5,X6)
& attr(X4,X3)
& attr(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1206) ).
fof(has_card_eq,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( card(X1,X2)
=> has_card_leq(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',has_card_eq) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1206,hypothesis,
( gener(mark_1_1,ge)
& sort(mark_1_1,me)
& card(c92,int929)
& sort(c92,nu)
& varia(kurs_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(kurs_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(kurs_1_1,one)
& gener(kurs_1_1,ge)
& fact(kurs_1_1,real)
& etype(kurs_1_1,int0)
& card(kurs_1_1,int1)
& sort(kurs_1_1,io)
& sort(kurs_1_1,d)
& sort(kurs_1_1,ad)
& varia(bmw_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(bmw_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(bmw_1_1,one)
& gener(bmw_1_1,ge)
& fact(bmw_1_1,real)
& etype(bmw_1_1,int0)
& card(bmw_1_1,int1)
& sort(bmw_1_1,d)
& card(c74,int1994)
& sort(c74,nu)
& varia(jahr__1_1,varia_c)
& refer(jahr__1_1,refer_c)
& quant(jahr__1_1,quant_c)
& gener(jahr__1_1,ge)
& fact(jahr__1_1,real)
& etype(jahr__1_1,etype_c)
& card(jahr__1_1,card_c)
& sort(jahr__1_1,ta)
& sort(jahr__1_1,oa)
& sort(jahr__1_1,me)
& varia(c79,varia_c)
& refer(c79,refer_c)
& quant(c79,quant_c)
& gener(c79,sp)
& fact(c79,real)
& etype(c79,etype_c)
& card(c79,card_c)
& sort(c79,ta)
& sort(c79,oa)
& sort(c79,me)
& varia(anfang_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(anfang_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(anfang_1_1,one)
& gener(anfang_1_1,ge)
& fact(anfang_1_1,real)
& etype(anfang_1_1,int0)
& card(anfang_1_1,int1)
& sort(anfang_1_1,io)
& sort(anfang_1_1,ad)
& varia(c73,varia_c)
& refer(c73,refer_c)
& quant(c73,one)
& gener(c73,gener_c)
& fact(c73,real)
& etype(c73,int0)
& card(c73,int1)
& sort(c73,io)
& sort(c73,ad)
& varia(zeitraum_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(zeitraum_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(zeitraum_1_1,one)
& gener(zeitraum_1_1,ge)
& fact(zeitraum_1_1,real)
& etype(zeitraum_1_1,int0)
& card(zeitraum_1_1,int1)
& sort(zeitraum_1_1,ta)
& varia(c96,con)
& refer(c96,refer_c)
& quant(c96,quant_c)
& gener(c96,gener_c)
& fact(c96,real)
& etype(c96,etype_c)
& card(c96,card_c)
& sort(c96,m)
& sort(c96,co)
& varia(c88,varia_c)
& refer(c88,refer_c)
& quant(c88,one)
& gener(c88,gener_c)
& fact(c88,real)
& etype(c88,int0)
& card(c88,int1)
& sort(c88,io)
& sort(c88,d)
& sort(c88,ad)
& varia(c83,con)
& refer(c83,det)
& quant(c83,one)
& gener(c83,sp)
& fact(c83,real)
& etype(c83,int0)
& card(c83,int1)
& sort(c83,d)
& varia(c78,con)
& refer(c78,det)
& quant(c78,one)
& gener(c78,sp)
& fact(c78,real)
& etype(c78,int0)
& card(c78,int1)
& sort(c78,t)
& varia(c69,con)
& refer(c69,det)
& quant(c69,one)
& gener(c69,sp)
& fact(c69,real)
& etype(c69,int0)
& card(c69,int1)
& sort(c69,ta)
& varia(c279,varia_c)
& refer(c279,refer_c)
& quant(c279,quant_c)
& gener(c279,gener_c)
& fact(c279,real)
& etype(c279,etype_c)
& card(c279,card_c)
& sort(c279,ent)
& quant_p3(c96,c92,mark_1_1)
& sub(c88,kurs_1_1)
& sub(c83,bmw_1_1)
& val(c79,c74)
& sub(c79,jahr__1_1)
& attr(c78,c79)
& assoc(c78,c73)
& sub(c73,anfang_1_1)
& sub(c69,zeitraum_1_1)
& tupl_p6(c279,c69,c78,c83,c88,c96) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1206) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7] :
( val(X6,X7)
& sub(X6,jahr__1_1)
& has_card_leq(X7,int1994)
& attr(X5,X6)
& attr(X4,X3)
& attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1206]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14] :
( ~ val(X13,X14)
| ~ sub(X13,jahr__1_1)
| ~ has_card_leq(X14,int1994)
| ~ attr(X12,X13)
| ~ attr(X11,X10)
| ~ attr(X8,X9) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( has_card_leq(X18,X19)
| ~ card(X18,X19) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[has_card_eq])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ val(X6,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,jahr__1_1)
| ~ has_card_leq(X7,int1994)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ card(X1,X2)
| has_card_leq(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ card(X2,int1994)
| ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
| ~ attr(X6,X7)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ val(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
val(c79,c74),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1206]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
sub(c79,jahr__1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1206]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
card(c74,int1994),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1206]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X1,c79) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
attr(c78,c79),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1206]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR115+30 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.38 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:06:18 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.77 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.56/0.77 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.77 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % new_bool_1 with pid 3781360 completed with status 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.56/0.77 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.77 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.56/0.77 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.56/0.77 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.77 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3781362 completed with status 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.56/0.77 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.77 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.56/0.77 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.56/0.77 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.77 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.56/0.77 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.77 % Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.56/0.77
% 0.56/0.77 % Proof found!
% 0.56/0.77 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.56/0.77 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.77 % Parsed axioms : 10189
% 0.56/0.77 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 10143
% 0.56/0.77 % Initial clauses : 176
% 0.56/0.77 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Initial clauses in saturation : 176
% 0.56/0.77 % Processed clauses : 239
% 0.56/0.77 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % ...remaining for further processing : 239
% 0.56/0.77 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.56/0.77 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Generated clauses : 64
% 0.56/0.77 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 63
% 0.56/0.77 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Paramodulations : 63
% 0.56/0.77 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % NegExts : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.56/0.77 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.56/0.77 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.77 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.77 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.77 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.77 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.77 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.77 % Current number of processed clauses : 230
% 0.56/0.77 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 194
% 0.56/0.77 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.56/0.77 % Non-unit-clauses : 35
% 0.56/0.77 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.56/0.77 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.56/0.77 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 843
% 0.56/0.77 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 436
% 0.56/0.77 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.56/0.77 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.56/0.77 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/0.77 % Termbank termtop insertions : 48555
% 0.56/0.77 % Search garbage collected termcells : 38689
% 0.56/0.77
% 0.56/0.77 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.77 % User time : 0.055 s
% 0.56/0.77 % System time : 0.071 s
% 0.56/0.77 % Total time : 0.126 s
% 0.56/0.77 % Maximum resident set size: 44972 pages
% 0.56/0.77
% 0.56/0.77 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.77 % User time : 0.144 s
% 0.56/0.77 % System time : 0.100 s
% 0.56/0.77 % Total time : 0.245 s
% 0.56/0.77 % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 0.56/0.77 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------