↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : CSR115+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:15:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.74s 2.03s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   79 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  105 (  45   ~;  38   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   9 sgn  12   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1087,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2] : obj(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1087) ).

fof(sub__bezeichnen_1_1_als,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( arg1(X1,X2)
        & arg2(X1,X3)
        & subr(X1,sub_0) )
     => ? [X4,X5,X6] :
          ( arg1(X5,X2)
          & arg2(X5,X6)
          & hsit(X1,X4)
          & mcont(X4,X5)
          & obj(X4,X2)
          & sub(X6,X3)
          & subr(X5,rprs_0)
          & subs(X4,bezeichnen_1_1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',sub__bezeichnen_1_1_als) ).

fof(sub__sub_0_expansion,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( sub(X1,X2)
     => ? [X3] :
          ( arg1(X3,X1)
          & arg2(X3,X2)
          & subr(X3,sub_0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',sub__sub_0_expansion) ).

fof(fact_9405,axiom,
    sub(herrscher__1_1,an_f__374hrer_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',fact_9405) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2] : obj(X2,X1),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1087]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X673,X674,X675] :
      ( ( arg1(esk44_3(X673,X674,X675),X674)
        | ~ arg1(X673,X674)
        | ~ arg2(X673,X675)
        | ~ subr(X673,sub_0) )
      & ( arg2(esk44_3(X673,X674,X675),esk45_3(X673,X674,X675))
        | ~ arg1(X673,X674)
        | ~ arg2(X673,X675)
        | ~ subr(X673,sub_0) )
      & ( hsit(X673,esk43_3(X673,X674,X675))
        | ~ arg1(X673,X674)
        | ~ arg2(X673,X675)
        | ~ subr(X673,sub_0) )
      & ( mcont(esk43_3(X673,X674,X675),esk44_3(X673,X674,X675))
        | ~ arg1(X673,X674)
        | ~ arg2(X673,X675)
        | ~ subr(X673,sub_0) )
      & ( obj(esk43_3(X673,X674,X675),X674)
        | ~ arg1(X673,X674)
        | ~ arg2(X673,X675)
        | ~ subr(X673,sub_0) )
      & ( sub(esk45_3(X673,X674,X675),X675)
        | ~ arg1(X673,X674)
        | ~ arg2(X673,X675)
        | ~ subr(X673,sub_0) )
      & ( subr(esk44_3(X673,X674,X675),rprs_0)
        | ~ arg1(X673,X674)
        | ~ arg2(X673,X675)
        | ~ subr(X673,sub_0) )
      & ( subs(esk43_3(X673,X674,X675),bezeichnen_1_1)
        | ~ arg1(X673,X674)
        | ~ arg2(X673,X675)
        | ~ subr(X673,sub_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sub__bezeichnen_1_1_als])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X373,X374] : ~ obj(X374,X373),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( obj(esk43_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ obj(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X679,X680] :
      ( ( arg1(esk46_2(X679,X680),X679)
        | ~ sub(X679,X680) )
      & ( arg2(esk46_2(X679,X680),X680)
        | ~ sub(X679,X680) )
      & ( subr(esk46_2(X679,X680),sub_0)
        | ~ sub(X679,X680) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sub__sub_0_expansion])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X3) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subr(esk46_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk46_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ arg1(esk46_2(X1,X2),X4)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( arg2(esk46_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ arg1(esk46_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( arg1(esk46_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    sub(herrscher__1_1,an_f__374hrer_1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_9405]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ sub(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : CSR115+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:07:14 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.74/2.03  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.74/2.03  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/2.03  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/2.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.74/2.03  % Total time : 1.663s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------