%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:19:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.33s 0.85s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 123 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 144 ( 42 ~; 36 |; 64 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 45 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 19 ( 18 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 36 ( 36 usr; 32 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 7 sgn 12 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1087,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] : obj(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1087) ).
fof(sub__bezeichnen_1_1_als,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subr(X1,sub_0)
& arg2(X1,X3)
& arg1(X1,X2) )
=> ? [X4,X5,X6] :
( subs(X4,bezeichnen_1_1)
& subr(X5,rprs_0)
& sub(X6,X3)
& obj(X4,X2)
& mcont(X4,X5)
& hsit(X1,X4)
& arg2(X5,X6)
& arg1(X5,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',sub__bezeichnen_1_1_als) ).
fof(sub__sub_0_expansion,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( sub(X1,X2)
=> ? [X3] :
( subr(X3,sub_0)
& arg2(X3,X2)
& arg1(X3,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',sub__sub_0_expansion) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1087,hypothesis,
( varia(c2590,varia_c)
& refer(c2590,refer_c)
& quant(c2590,quant_c)
& gener(c2590,gener_c)
& fact(c2590,real)
& etype(c2590,etype_c)
& card(c2590,card_c)
& sort(c2590,ent)
& gener(million_1_1,ge)
& sort(million_1_1,me)
& card(c2406,int12)
& sort(c2406,nu)
& varia(c2409,con)
& refer(c2409,refer_c)
& quant(c2409,quant_c)
& gener(c2409,gener_c)
& fact(c2409,real)
& etype(c2409,etype_c)
& card(c2409,card_c)
& sort(c2409,m)
& sort(c2409,co)
& varia(beitrag_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(beitrag_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(beitrag_1_1,one)
& gener(beitrag_1_1,ge)
& fact(beitrag_1_1,real)
& etype(beitrag_1_1,int0)
& card(beitrag_1_1,int1)
& sort(beitrag_1_1,io)
& varia(c2403,varia_c)
& refer(c2403,indet)
& quant(c2403,one)
& gener(c2403,sp)
& fact(c2403,real)
& etype(c2403,int0)
& card(c2403,int1)
& sort(c2403,io)
& gener(mark_1_1,ge)
& sort(mark_1_1,me)
& fact(c2383,real)
& sort(c2383,me)
& tupl_p4(c2590,c2383,c2403,c2409)
& quant_p3(c2409,c2406,million_1_1)
& sub(c2403,beitrag_1_1)
& sub(c2383,mark_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1087) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] : obj(X2,X1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1087]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X308,X309,X310] :
( ( ~ subr(X308,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X308,X310)
| ~ arg1(X308,X309)
| subs(esk43_3(X308,X309,X310),bezeichnen_1_1) )
& ( ~ subr(X308,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X308,X310)
| ~ arg1(X308,X309)
| subr(esk44_3(X308,X309,X310),rprs_0) )
& ( ~ subr(X308,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X308,X310)
| ~ arg1(X308,X309)
| sub(esk45_3(X308,X309,X310),X310) )
& ( ~ subr(X308,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X308,X310)
| ~ arg1(X308,X309)
| obj(esk43_3(X308,X309,X310),X309) )
& ( ~ subr(X308,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X308,X310)
| ~ arg1(X308,X309)
| mcont(esk43_3(X308,X309,X310),esk44_3(X308,X309,X310)) )
& ( ~ subr(X308,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X308,X310)
| ~ arg1(X308,X309)
| hsit(X308,esk43_3(X308,X309,X310)) )
& ( ~ subr(X308,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X308,X310)
| ~ arg1(X308,X309)
| arg2(esk44_3(X308,X309,X310),esk45_3(X308,X309,X310)) )
& ( ~ subr(X308,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X308,X310)
| ~ arg1(X308,X309)
| arg1(esk44_3(X308,X309,X310),X309) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sub__bezeichnen_1_1_als])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X8,X9] : ~ obj(X9,X8),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X314,X315] :
( ( ~ sub(X314,X315)
| subr(esk46_2(X314,X315),sub_0) )
& ( ~ sub(X314,X315)
| arg2(esk46_2(X314,X315),X315) )
& ( ~ sub(X314,X315)
| arg1(esk46_2(X314,X315),X314) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sub__sub_0_expansion])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| obj(esk43_3(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ obj(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,X2)
| subr(esk46_2(X1,X2),sub_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
sub(c2403,beitrag_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1087]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ arg1(X1,X3)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
subr(esk46_2(c2403,beitrag_1_1),sub_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,X2)
| arg2(esk46_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,X2)
| arg1(esk46_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
( ~ arg1(esk46_2(c2403,beitrag_1_1),X2)
| ~ arg2(esk46_2(c2403,beitrag_1_1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
arg2(esk46_2(c2403,beitrag_1_1),beitrag_1_1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
arg1(esk46_2(c2403,beitrag_1_1),c2403),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
~ arg1(esk46_2(c2403,beitrag_1_1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR115+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:06:42 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/0.85 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.33/0.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3116912 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.33/0.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.33/0.85 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.33/0.85 % Search class: FHUNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.85 % partial match(2): FGUPS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.85 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 254s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 254s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting new_bool_1 with 254s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % new_bool_3 with pid 3116925 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.33/0.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.33/0.85 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.33/0.85 % Search class: FHUNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.85 % partial match(2): FGUPS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.85 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 254s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 254s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.85 % Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 0.33/0.85 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.33/0.85
% 0.33/0.85 % Proof found!
% 0.33/0.85 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.33/0.85 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/0.85 % Parsed axioms : 10189
% 0.33/0.85 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9972
% 0.33/0.85 % Initial clauses : 402
% 0.33/0.85 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Initial clauses in saturation : 402
% 0.33/0.85 % Processed clauses : 976
% 0.33/0.85 % ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.33/0.85 % ...subsumed : 67
% 0.33/0.85 % ...remaining for further processing : 903
% 0.33/0.85 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.33/0.85 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Generated clauses : 504
% 0.33/0.85 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 503
% 0.33/0.85 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Paramodulations : 503
% 0.33/0.85 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % NegExts : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.33/0.85 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.85 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.85 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.85 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.85 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.85 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.85 % Current number of processed clauses : 566
% 0.33/0.85 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 295
% 0.33/0.85 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.33/0.85 % Non-unit-clauses : 264
% 0.33/0.85 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 257
% 0.33/0.85 % ...number of literals in the above : 538
% 0.33/0.85 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Current number of archived clauses : 337
% 0.33/0.85 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25014
% 0.33/0.85 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12642
% 0.33/0.85 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 41
% 0.33/0.85 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2508
% 0.33/0.85 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.33/0.85 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.33/0.85 % Termbank termtop insertions : 70521
% 0.33/0.85 % Search garbage collected termcells : 40518
% 0.33/0.85
% 0.33/0.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.85 % User time : 0.110 s
% 0.33/0.85 % System time : 0.099 s
% 0.33/0.85 % Total time : 0.209 s
% 0.33/0.85 % Maximum resident set size: 49900 pages
% 0.33/0.85
% 0.33/0.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.85 % User time : 0.521 s
% 0.33/0.85 % System time : 0.314 s
% 0.33/0.85 % Total time : 0.835 s
% 0.33/0.85 % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 0.33/0.85 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------