↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+48 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.51s 0.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  236 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :  122 (   9 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  284 (  74   ~;  64   |; 145   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :  122 (  11 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   19 (  18 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   43 (  43 usr;  43 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   0 sgn  12   !;  16   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( val(X7,X8)
      & val(X3,bmw_0)
      & val(X2,bmw_0)
      & temp(X5,X6)
      & sub(X7,jahr__1_1)
      & sub(X3,name_1_1)
      & sub(X1,firma_1_1)
      & sub(X2,name_1_1)
      & has_card_leq(X8,int1994)
      & attr(X6,X7)
      & attr(X4,X3)
      & attr(X1,X2)
      & agt(X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289) ).

fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289,hypothesis,
    ( varia(schon_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(schon_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(schon_1_1,one)
    & gener(schon_1_1,sp)
    & fact(schon_1_1,real)
    & etype(schon_1_1,int0)
    & card(schon_1_1,int1)
    & sort(schon_1_1,t)
    & gener(festigen_1_1,ge)
    & fact(festigen_1_1,real)
    & sort(festigen_1_1,da)
    & card(c508,int1994)
    & sort(c508,nu)
    & varia(jahr__1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(jahr__1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(jahr__1_1,quant_c)
    & gener(jahr__1_1,ge)
    & fact(jahr__1_1,real)
    & etype(jahr__1_1,etype_c)
    & card(jahr__1_1,card_c)
    & sort(jahr__1_1,ta)
    & sort(jahr__1_1,oa)
    & sort(jahr__1_1,me)
    & varia(c518,varia_c)
    & refer(c518,refer_c)
    & quant(c518,quant_c)
    & gener(c518,sp)
    & fact(c518,real)
    & etype(c518,etype_c)
    & card(c518,card_c)
    & sort(c518,ta)
    & sort(c518,oa)
    & sort(c518,me)
    & varia(c517,con)
    & refer(c517,det)
    & quant(c517,one)
    & gener(c517,sp)
    & fact(c517,real)
    & etype(c517,int0)
    & card(c517,int1)
    & sort(c517,t)
    & sort(rover_0,fe)
    & varia(c507,varia_c)
    & refer(c507,indet)
    & quant(c507,one)
    & gener(c507,sp)
    & fact(c507,real)
    & etype(c507,int0)
    & card(c507,int1)
    & sort(c507,na)
    & varia(c506,con)
    & refer(c506,det)
    & quant(c506,one)
    & gener(c506,sp)
    & fact(c506,real)
    & etype(c506,int0)
    & card(c506,int1)
    & sort(c506,io)
    & sort(c506,d)
    & sort(bmw_0,fe)
    & varia(name_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(name_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(name_1_1,one)
    & gener(name_1_1,ge)
    & fact(name_1_1,real)
    & etype(name_1_1,int0)
    & card(name_1_1,int1)
    & sort(name_1_1,na)
    & varia(firma_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(firma_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(firma_1_1,one)
    & gener(firma_1_1,ge)
    & fact(firma_1_1,real)
    & etype(firma_1_1,int0)
    & card(firma_1_1,int1)
    & sort(firma_1_1,io)
    & sort(firma_1_1,d)
    & varia(c420,varia_c)
    & refer(c420,indet)
    & quant(c420,one)
    & gener(c420,sp)
    & fact(c420,real)
    & etype(c420,int0)
    & card(c420,int1)
    & sort(c420,na)
    & gener(erw__344gen_1_1,ge)
    & fact(erw__344gen_1_1,real)
    & sort(erw__344gen_1_1,da)
    & varia(c419,con)
    & refer(c419,det)
    & quant(c419,one)
    & gener(c419,sp)
    & fact(c419,real)
    & etype(c419,int0)
    & card(c419,int1)
    & sort(c419,io)
    & sort(c419,d)
    & gener(c519,sp)
    & fact(c519,hypo)
    & sort(c519,da)
    & gener(c417,sp)
    & fact(c417,real)
    & sort(c417,da)
    & temp(c519,schon_1_1)
    & temp(c519,c517)
    & subs(c519,festigen_1_1)
    & obj(c519,c506)
    & agt(c519,c419)
    & val(c518,c508)
    & sub(c518,jahr__1_1)
    & attr(c517,c518)
    & val(c507,rover_0)
    & sub(c507,name_1_1)
    & sub(c506,firma_1_1)
    & attr(c506,c507)
    & val(c420,bmw_0)
    & sub(c420,name_1_1)
    & sub(c419,firma_1_1)
    & attr(c419,c420)
    & subs(c417,erw__344gen_1_1)
    & mexp(c417,c419)
    & mcont(c417,c519) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289) ).

fof(has_card_eq,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( card(X1,X2)
     => has_card_leq(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',has_card_eq) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
        ( val(X7,X8)
        & val(X3,bmw_0)
        & val(X2,bmw_0)
        & temp(X5,X6)
        & sub(X7,jahr__1_1)
        & sub(X3,name_1_1)
        & sub(X1,firma_1_1)
        & sub(X2,name_1_1)
        & has_card_leq(X8,int1994)
        & attr(X6,X7)
        & attr(X4,X3)
        & attr(X1,X2)
        & agt(X5,X4) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ~ val(X15,X16)
      | ~ val(X11,bmw_0)
      | ~ val(X10,bmw_0)
      | ~ temp(X13,X14)
      | ~ sub(X15,jahr__1_1)
      | ~ sub(X11,name_1_1)
      | ~ sub(X9,firma_1_1)
      | ~ sub(X10,name_1_1)
      | ~ has_card_leq(X16,int1994)
      | ~ attr(X14,X15)
      | ~ attr(X12,X11)
      | ~ attr(X9,X10)
      | ~ agt(X13,X12) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ val(X7,X8)
    | ~ val(X5,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X4,bmw_0)
    | ~ temp(X1,X6)
    | ~ sub(X7,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
    | ~ has_card_leq(X8,int1994)
    | ~ attr(X6,X7)
    | ~ attr(X2,X5)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ agt(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    val(c420,bmw_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    sub(c420,name_1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_card_leq(X3,int1994)
    | ~ sub(X6,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X7,X5)
    | ~ agt(X7,X4)
    | ~ attr(X6,X1)
    | ~ attr(X5,X2)
    | ~ attr(X4,c420)
    | ~ val(X2,X3)
    | ~ val(X1,bmw_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_card_leq(X2,int1994)
    | ~ sub(X4,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X6,X5)
    | ~ agt(X6,X3)
    | ~ attr(X5,X1)
    | ~ attr(X4,c420)
    | ~ attr(X3,c420)
    | ~ val(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    attr(c419,c420),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_card_leq(X2,int1994)
    | ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X5,X4)
    | ~ agt(X5,c419)
    | ~ attr(X4,X1)
    | ~ attr(X3,c420)
    | ~ val(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    sub(c419,firma_1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( has_card_leq(X32,X33)
      | ~ card(X32,X33) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[has_card_eq])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_card_leq(X2,int1994)
    | ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X4,X3)
    | ~ agt(X4,c419)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ val(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ card(X1,X2)
    | has_card_leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    ( ~ card(X2,int1994)
    | ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
    | ~ temp(X4,X3)
    | ~ agt(X4,c419)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ val(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    val(c518,c508),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    sub(c518,jahr__1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    card(c508,int1994),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    ( ~ temp(X2,X1)
    | ~ agt(X2,c419)
    | ~ attr(X1,c518) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    attr(c517,c518),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    ( ~ temp(X1,c517)
    | ~ agt(X1,c419) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    temp(c519,c517),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    agt(c519,c419),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1289]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CSR115+48 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:07:10 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/0.90  % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.51/0.90  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/0.90  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % new_bool_1 with pid 1140739 completed with status 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 2.51/0.90  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/0.90  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.51/0.90  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.51/0.90  % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 2.51/0.90  % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 2.51/0.90  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1140742 completed with status 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 2.51/0.90  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/0.90  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.51/0.90  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.51/0.90  % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 2.51/0.90  % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 2.51/0.90  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.51/0.90  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 2.51/0.90  % Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 2.51/0.90  
% 2.51/0.90  % Proof found!
% 2.51/0.90  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.51/0.90  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.51/0.90  % Parsed axioms                        : 10189
% 2.51/0.90  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10115
% 2.51/0.90  % Initial clauses                      : 215
% 2.51/0.90  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 215
% 2.51/0.90  % Processed clauses                    : 607
% 2.51/0.90  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % ...subsumed                          : 83
% 2.51/0.90  % ...remaining for further processing  : 524
% 2.51/0.90  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 2.51/0.90  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Generated clauses                    : 1255
% 2.51/0.90  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1032
% 2.51/0.90  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 2.51/0.90  % Paramodulations                      : 1255
% 2.51/0.90  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % NegExts                              : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Total rewrite steps                  : 45
% 2.51/0.90  % ...of those cached                   : 36
% 2.51/0.90  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.51/0.90  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.51/0.90  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.51/0.90  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.51/0.90  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.51/0.90  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.51/0.90  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.51/0.90  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.51/0.90  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.51/0.90  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.51/0.90  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.51/0.90  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.51/0.90  % Current number of processed clauses  : 518
% 2.51/0.90  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 183
% 2.51/0.90  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.51/0.90  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 2.51/0.90  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 335
% 2.51/0.90  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 626
% 2.51/0.90  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4724
% 2.51/0.90  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 2.51/0.90  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42078
% 2.51/0.90  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8374
% 2.51/0.90  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 91
% 2.51/0.90  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 2.51/0.90  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.51/0.90  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 82637
% 2.51/0.90  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 39203
% 2.51/0.90  
% 2.51/0.90  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.51/0.90  % User time                : 0.209 s
% 2.51/0.90  % System time              : 0.123 s
% 2.51/0.90  % Total time               : 0.331 s
% 2.51/0.90  % Maximum resident set size: 44968 pages
% 2.51/0.90  
% 2.51/0.90  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.51/0.90  % User time                : 0.298 s
% 2.51/0.90  % System time              : 0.150 s
% 2.51/0.90  % Total time               : 0.448 s
% 2.51/0.90  % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 2.51/0.90  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------