%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+50 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.65s 1.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 243 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 180 ( 10 avg)
% Number of connectives : 256 ( 36 ~; 27 |; 192 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 180 ( 12 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 18 ( 17 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 47 ( 47 usr; 46 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 27 sgn 12 !; 13 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984,conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( val(X2,bmw_0)
& subs(X4,n374bernehmen_1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& sub(X1,firma_1_1)
& attr(X5,X6)
& attr(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984,hypothesis,
( sort(m__374nchen_0,fe)
& varia(stadt__1_1,varia_c)
& refer(stadt__1_1,refer_c)
& quant(stadt__1_1,one)
& gener(stadt__1_1,ge)
& fact(stadt__1_1,real)
& etype(stadt__1_1,int0)
& card(stadt__1_1,int1)
& sort(stadt__1_1,io)
& sort(stadt__1_1,d)
& varia(c87,varia_c)
& refer(c87,indet)
& quant(c87,one)
& gener(c87,sp)
& fact(c87,real)
& etype(c87,int0)
& card(c87,int1)
& sort(c87,na)
& sort(bmw_0,fe)
& varia(firma_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(firma_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(firma_1_1,one)
& gener(firma_1_1,ge)
& fact(firma_1_1,real)
& etype(firma_1_1,int0)
& card(firma_1_1,int1)
& sort(firma_1_1,io)
& sort(firma_1_1,d)
& varia(c74,varia_c)
& refer(c74,indet)
& quant(c74,one)
& gener(c74,sp)
& fact(c74,real)
& etype(c74,int0)
& card(c74,int1)
& sort(c74,na)
& sort(rover_0,fe)
& sort(britisch__1_1,nq)
& varia(c56,varia_c)
& refer(c56,indet)
& quant(c56,one)
& gener(c56,sp)
& fact(c56,real)
& etype(c56,int0)
& card(c56,int1)
& sort(c56,na)
& varia(annahme_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(annahme_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(annahme_1_1,one)
& gener(annahme_1_1,ge)
& fact(annahme_1_1,real)
& etype(annahme_1_1,int0)
& card(annahme_1_1,int1)
& sort(annahme_1_1,ad)
& varia(c55,con)
& refer(c55,det)
& quant(c55,one)
& gener(c55,sp)
& fact(c55,real)
& etype(c55,int0)
& card(c55,int1)
& sort(c55,io)
& sort(c55,d)
& sort(eu_0,fe)
& varia(name_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(name_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(name_1_1,one)
& gener(name_1_1,ge)
& fact(name_1_1,real)
& etype(name_1_1,int0)
& card(name_1_1,int1)
& sort(name_1_1,na)
& varia(kommission_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(kommission_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(kommission_1_1,quant_c)
& gener(kommission_1_1,ge)
& fact(kommission_1_1,real)
& etype(kommission_1_1,int1)
& card(kommission_1_1,card_c)
& sort(kommission_1_1,io)
& sort(kommission_1_1,d)
& varia(c19,varia_c)
& refer(c19,det)
& quant(c19,one)
& gener(c19,sp)
& fact(c19,real)
& etype(c19,int0)
& card(c19,int1)
& sort(c19,na)
& varia(c86,con)
& refer(c86,det)
& quant(c86,one)
& gener(c86,sp)
& fact(c86,real)
& etype(c86,int0)
& card(c86,int1)
& sort(c86,io)
& sort(c86,d)
& varia(c73,con)
& refer(c73,det)
& quant(c73,one)
& gener(c73,sp)
& fact(c73,real)
& etype(c73,int0)
& card(c73,int1)
& sort(c73,io)
& sort(c73,d)
& varia(c25,con)
& refer(c25,det)
& quant(c25,one)
& gener(c25,sp)
& fact(c25,real)
& etype(c25,int0)
& card(c25,int1)
& sort(c25,ad)
& varia(c18,varia_c)
& refer(c18,det)
& quant(c18,one)
& gener(c18,sp)
& fact(c18,real)
& etype(c18,int1)
& card(c18,int1)
& sort(c18,io)
& sort(c18,d)
& varia(c171,varia_c)
& refer(c171,refer_c)
& quant(c171,quant_c)
& gener(c171,gener_c)
& fact(c171,real)
& etype(c171,etype_c)
& card(c171,card_c)
& sort(c171,ent)
& varia(fabrikant_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(fabrikant_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(fabrikant_1_1,one)
& gener(fabrikant_1_1,ge)
& fact(fabrikant_1_1,real)
& etype(fabrikant_1_1,int0)
& card(fabrikant_1_1,int1)
& sort(fabrikant_1_1,io)
& sort(fabrikant_1_1,d)
& varia(auto__1_1,varia_c)
& refer(auto__1_1,refer_c)
& quant(auto__1_1,one)
& gener(auto__1_1,ge)
& fact(auto__1_1,real)
& etype(auto__1_1,int0)
& card(auto__1_1,int1)
& sort(auto__1_1,d)
& varia(autobauer_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(autobauer_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(autobauer_1_1,one)
& gener(autobauer_1_1,ge)
& fact(autobauer_1_1,real)
& etype(autobauer_1_1,int0)
& card(autobauer_1_1,int1)
& sort(autobauer_1_1,io)
& sort(autobauer_1_1,d)
& val(c87,m__374nchen_0)
& sub(c87,name_1_1)
& sub(c86,stadt__1_1)
& attr(c86,c87)
& val(c74,bmw_0)
& sub(c74,name_1_1)
& sub(c73,firma_1_1)
& attr(c73,c74)
& val(c56,rover_0)
& sub(c56,name_1_1)
& sub(c55,autobauer_1_1)
& prop(c55,britisch__1_1)
& attr(c55,c56)
& subs(c25,annahme_1_1)
& obj(c25,c55)
& val(c19,eu_0)
& sub(c19,name_1_1)
& sub(c18,kommission_1_1)
& attr(c18,c19)
& tupl_p5(c171,c18,c25,c73,c86)
& sub(autobauer_1_1,fabrikant_1_1)
& assoc(autobauer_1_1,auto__1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984) ).
fof(chea_subs_abs__event,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subs(X1,X2)
& chea(X3,X2) )
=> ? [X4] :
( subs(X4,X3)
& chea(X4,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',chea_subs_abs__event) ).
fof(fact_8354,axiom,
chea(n374bernehmen_1_1,annahme_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',fact_8354) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( val(X2,bmw_0)
& subs(X4,n374bernehmen_1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& sub(X1,firma_1_1)
& attr(X5,X6)
& attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
( ~ val(X9,bmw_0)
| ~ subs(X11,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X12,X13)
| ~ attr(X10,X9) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
| ~ subs(X6,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
val(c74,bmw_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
sub(c74,name_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
| ~ subs(X4,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X1,c74) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
attr(c73,c74),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X21,X22,X23] :
( ( ~ subs(X21,X22)
| ~ chea(X23,X22)
| subs(esk2_3(X21,X22,X23),X23) )
& ( ~ subs(X21,X22)
| ~ chea(X23,X22)
| chea(esk2_3(X21,X22,X23),X21) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[chea_subs_abs__event])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X4,firma_1_1)
| ~ subs(X3,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ subs(X1,X2)
| ~ chea(X3,X2)
| subs(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
| ~ subs(X4,X3)
| ~ chea(n374bernehmen_1_1,X3)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
chea(n374bernehmen_1_1,annahme_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_8354]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X4,firma_1_1)
| ~ subs(X3,annahme_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
subs(c25,annahme_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
sub(c73,firma_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
attr(c18,c19),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1295_a19984]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR115+50 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:12:15 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.65/1.09 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.65/1.09 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.65/1.09 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % new_bool_1 with pid 3423409 completed with status 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.65/1.09 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.65/1.09 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.65/1.09 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.65/1.09 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.65/1.09 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.65/1.09 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3423411 completed with status 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.65/1.09 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.65/1.09 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.65/1.09 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.65/1.09 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.65/1.09 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 1.65/1.09 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.65/1.09 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.65/1.09 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 1.65/1.09
% 1.65/1.09 % Proof found!
% 1.65/1.09 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.65/1.09 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.65/1.09 % Parsed axioms : 10189
% 1.65/1.09 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 10124
% 1.65/1.09 % Initial clauses : 264
% 1.65/1.09 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Initial clauses in saturation : 264
% 1.65/1.09 % Processed clauses : 458
% 1.65/1.09 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % ...subsumed : 40
% 1.65/1.09 % ...remaining for further processing : 418
% 1.65/1.09 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 1.65/1.09 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Generated clauses : 395
% 1.65/1.09 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 378
% 1.65/1.09 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Paramodulations : 391
% 1.65/1.09 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % NegExts : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 1.65/1.09 % ...of those cached : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.65/1.09 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.65/1.09 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.65/1.09 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.65/1.09 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.65/1.09 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.65/1.09 % Current number of processed clauses : 406
% 1.65/1.09 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 256
% 1.65/1.09 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.65/1.09 % Non-unit-clauses : 149
% 1.65/1.09 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 184
% 1.65/1.09 % ...number of literals in the above : 840
% 1.65/1.09 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 1.65/1.09 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7777
% 1.65/1.09 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5304
% 1.65/1.09 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 45
% 1.65/1.09 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 1.65/1.09 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.65/1.09 % Termbank termtop insertions : 56714
% 1.65/1.09 % Search garbage collected termcells : 39042
% 1.65/1.09
% 1.65/1.09 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.65/1.09 % User time : 0.095 s
% 1.65/1.09 % System time : 0.080 s
% 1.65/1.09 % Total time : 0.176 s
% 1.65/1.09 % Maximum resident set size: 44488 pages
% 1.65/1.09
% 1.65/1.09 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.65/1.09 % User time : 0.263 s
% 1.65/1.09 % System time : 0.119 s
% 1.65/1.09 % Total time : 0.382 s
% 1.65/1.09 % Maximum resident set size: 13824 pages
% 1.65/1.09 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------