%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.84s 2.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 73 ( 0 equ; 52 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 37 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_879,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_879) ).
cnf(i_0_382,hypothesis,
val(c55668,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_382) ).
cnf(i_0_383,hypothesis,
sub(c55668,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_383) ).
cnf(i_0_386,hypothesis,
attr(c55667,c55668),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_386) ).
cnf(i_0_738,plain,
( obj(esk24_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X2,X1)
| ~ has_fact_leq(X2,real) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_738) ).
cnf(i_0_705,plain,
( has_fact_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ fact(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_705) ).
cnf(i_0_266,hypothesis,
fact(c55667,real),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_266) ).
cnf(i_0_837,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_837) ).
cnf(i_0_385,hypothesis,
prop(c55667,bundesdeutsch_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_385) ).
cnf(i_0_641,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(bundesdeutsch_1_1,bundesrepublik_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_641) ).
cnf(i_0_392,hypothesis,
attr(c18,c19),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iftv60go/lgb.p',i_0_392) ).
cnf(c_0_891,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_879 ).
cnf(c_0_892,hypothesis,
val(c55668,bmw_0),
i_0_382 ).
cnf(c_0_893,hypothesis,
sub(c55668,name_1_1),
i_0_383 ).
cnf(c_0_894,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c55668)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_891,c_0_892]),c_0_893])]) ).
cnf(c_0_895,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c55668)
| ~ attr(X2,c55668)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_894,c_0_892]),c_0_893])]) ).
cnf(c_0_896,hypothesis,
attr(c55667,c55668),
i_0_386 ).
cnf(c_0_897,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c55668)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c55667) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_895,c_0_896]) ).
cnf(c_0_898,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c55667) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_897,c_0_896]) ).
cnf(c_0_899,plain,
( obj(esk24_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X2,X1)
| ~ has_fact_leq(X2,real) ),
i_0_738 ).
cnf(c_0_900,plain,
( ~ has_fact_leq(c55667,real)
| ~ loc(c55667,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_898,c_0_899]) ).
cnf(c_0_901,plain,
( has_fact_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ fact(X1,X2) ),
i_0_705 ).
cnf(c_0_902,hypothesis,
fact(c55667,real),
i_0_266 ).
cnf(c_0_903,plain,
( ~ loc(c55667,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_900,c_0_901]),c_0_902])]) ).
cnf(c_0_904,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
i_0_837 ).
cnf(c_0_905,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ prop(c55667,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_903,c_0_904]) ).
cnf(c_0_906,hypothesis,
prop(c55667,bundesdeutsch_1_1),
i_0_385 ).
cnf(c_0_907,hypothesis,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(bundesdeutsch_1_1,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_905,c_0_906]) ).
cnf(c_0_908,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(bundesdeutsch_1_1,bundesrepublik_0),
i_0_641 ).
cnf(c_0_909,hypothesis,
attr(c18,c19),
i_0_392 ).
cnf(c_0_910,plain,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_907,c_0_908]) ).
cnf(c_0_911,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_909,c_0_910]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 22:00:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.39/0.61 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.39/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.39/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.84/2.80 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.84/2.80 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.84/2.80 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.84/2.80 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.84/2.80 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.84/2.80 #
% 8.84/2.80 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 8.84/2.80 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.84/2.80
% 8.84/2.80 # Proof found!
% 8.84/2.80 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.84/2.80 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.84/2.80 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.84/2.80
% 8.84/2.80 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.84/2.80 # User time : 0.063 s
% 8.84/2.80 # System time : 0.008 s
% 8.84/2.80 # Total time : 0.071 s
% 8.84/2.80 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.84/2.80
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------