↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+60 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 10.92s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  262 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :  147 (  10 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  305 (  69   ~;  58   |; 176   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :  147 (  11 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   26 (  25 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   54 (  54 usr;  50 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (  28 sgn  16   !;  16   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1331_a19984,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( val(X2,bmw_0)
      & sub(X2,name_1_1)
      & sub(X1,firma_1_1)
      & obj(X4,X1)
      & attr(X5,X6)
      & attr(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1331_a19984) ).

fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1331_a19984,hypothesis,
    ( varia(c10386,varia_c)
    & refer(c10386,det)
    & quant(c10386,quant_c)
    & gener(c10386,sp)
    & fact(c10386,real)
    & etype(c10386,etype_c)
    & card(c10386,card_c)
    & sort(c10386,co)
    & gener(c5,sp)
    & fact(c5,real)
    & sort(c5,st)
    & varia(re_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(re_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(re_1_1,one)
    & gener(re_1_1,sp)
    & fact(re_1_1,real)
    & etype(re_1_1,int0)
    & card(re_1_1,int1)
    & sort(re_1_1,t)
    & varia(future_0,varia_c)
    & refer(future_0,refer_c)
    & quant(future_0,one)
    & gener(future_0,sp)
    & fact(future_0,real)
    & etype(future_0,int0)
    & card(future_0,int1)
    & sort(future_0,t)
    & varia(bald_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(bald_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(bald_1_1,one)
    & gener(bald_1_1,sp)
    & fact(bald_1_1,real)
    & etype(bald_1_1,int0)
    & card(bald_1_1,int1)
    & sort(bald_1_1,t)
    & gener(befinden_1_2,ge)
    & fact(befinden_1_2,real)
    & sort(befinden_1_2,st)
    & gener(so_1_1,gener_c)
    & fact(so_1_1,real)
    & sort(so_1_1,md)
    & gener(c11981,sp)
    & fact(c11981,real)
    & sort(c11981,st)
    & sort(rover_0,fe)
    & varia(c11966,varia_c)
    & refer(c11966,indet)
    & quant(c11966,one)
    & gener(c11966,sp)
    & fact(c11966,real)
    & etype(c11966,int0)
    & card(c11966,int1)
    & sort(c11966,na)
    & gener(nehmen_1_7,ge)
    & fact(nehmen_1_7,real)
    & sort(nehmen_1_7,da)
    & varia(c11965,con)
    & refer(c11965,det)
    & quant(c11965,one)
    & gener(c11965,sp)
    & fact(c11965,real)
    & etype(c11965,int0)
    & card(c11965,int1)
    & sort(c11965,io)
    & sort(c11965,d)
    & gener(c11873,sp)
    & fact(c11873,real)
    & sort(c11873,da)
    & varia(marke_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(marke_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(marke_1_1,one)
    & gener(marke_1_1,ge)
    & fact(marke_1_1,real)
    & etype(marke_1_1,int0)
    & card(marke_1_1,int1)
    & sort(marke_1_1,oa)
    & sort(marke_1_1,io)
    & sort(britisch__1_1,nq)
    & varia(c11687,con)
    & refer(c11687,det)
    & quant(c11687,one)
    & gener(c11687,sp)
    & fact(c11687,real)
    & etype(c11687,int0)
    & card(c11687,int1)
    & sort(c11687,oa)
    & sort(c11687,io)
    & sort(bmw_0,fe)
    & varia(name_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(name_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(name_1_1,one)
    & gener(name_1_1,ge)
    & fact(name_1_1,real)
    & etype(name_1_1,int0)
    & card(name_1_1,int1)
    & sort(name_1_1,na)
    & varia(firma_1_1,varia_c)
    & refer(firma_1_1,refer_c)
    & quant(firma_1_1,one)
    & gener(firma_1_1,ge)
    & fact(firma_1_1,real)
    & etype(firma_1_1,int0)
    & card(firma_1_1,int1)
    & sort(firma_1_1,io)
    & sort(firma_1_1,d)
    & varia(c11683,varia_c)
    & refer(c11683,indet)
    & quant(c11683,one)
    & gener(c11683,sp)
    & fact(c11683,real)
    & etype(c11683,int0)
    & card(c11683,int1)
    & sort(c11683,na)
    & varia(c11682,con)
    & refer(c11682,det)
    & quant(c11682,one)
    & gener(c11682,sp)
    & fact(c11682,real)
    & etype(c11682,int0)
    & card(c11682,int1)
    & sort(c11682,io)
    & sort(c11682,d)
    & temp(c5,c11873)
    & subs(c5,befinden_1_2)
    & scar(c5,c10386)
    & modl(c5,so_1_1)
    & temp(c11981,re_1_1)
    & temp(c11981,future_0)
    & temp(c11981,bald_1_1)
    & subs(c11981,befinden_1_2)
    & semrel(c11981,c11873)
    & scar(c11981,c11682)
    & modl(c11981,so_1_1)
    & val(c11966,rover_0)
    & sub(c11966,name_1_1)
    & sub(c11965,firma_1_1)
    & attr(c11965,c11966)
    & subs(c11873,nehmen_1_7)
    & obj(c11873,c11687)
    & benf(c11873,c11682)
    & agt(c11873,c11965)
    & sub(c11687,marke_1_1)
    & prop(c11687,britisch__1_1)
    & val(c11683,bmw_0)
    & sub(c11683,name_1_1)
    & sub(c11682,firma_1_1)
    & attr(c11682,c11683) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1331_a19984) ).

fof(sub__bezeichnen_1_1_als,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subr(X1,sub_0)
        & arg2(X1,X3)
        & arg1(X1,X2) )
     => ? [X4,X5,X6] :
          ( subs(X4,bezeichnen_1_1)
          & subr(X5,rprs_0)
          & sub(X6,X3)
          & obj(X4,X2)
          & mcont(X4,X5)
          & hsit(X1,X4)
          & arg2(X5,X6)
          & arg1(X5,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',sub__bezeichnen_1_1_als) ).

fof(sub__sub_0_expansion,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( sub(X1,X2)
     => ? [X3] :
          ( subr(X3,sub_0)
          & arg2(X3,X2)
          & arg1(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',sub__sub_0_expansion) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
        ( val(X2,bmw_0)
        & sub(X2,name_1_1)
        & sub(X1,firma_1_1)
        & obj(X4,X1)
        & attr(X5,X6)
        & attr(X3,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1331_a19984]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
      ( ~ val(X9,bmw_0)
      | ~ sub(X9,name_1_1)
      | ~ sub(X8,firma_1_1)
      | ~ obj(X11,X8)
      | ~ attr(X12,X13)
      | ~ attr(X10,X9) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X6,firma_1_1)
    | ~ obj(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    val(c11683,bmw_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1331_a19984]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    sub(c11683,name_1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1331_a19984]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
    | ~ obj(X4,X5)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ attr(X1,c11683) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    attr(c11682,c11683),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1331_a19984]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X4,firma_1_1)
    | ~ obj(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    sub(c11965,firma_1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_news_1331_a19984]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X299,X300,X301] :
      ( ( ~ subr(X299,sub_0)
        | ~ arg2(X299,X301)
        | ~ arg1(X299,X300)
        | subs(esk44_3(X299,X300,X301),bezeichnen_1_1) )
      & ( ~ subr(X299,sub_0)
        | ~ arg2(X299,X301)
        | ~ arg1(X299,X300)
        | subr(esk45_3(X299,X300,X301),rprs_0) )
      & ( ~ subr(X299,sub_0)
        | ~ arg2(X299,X301)
        | ~ arg1(X299,X300)
        | sub(esk46_3(X299,X300,X301),X301) )
      & ( ~ subr(X299,sub_0)
        | ~ arg2(X299,X301)
        | ~ arg1(X299,X300)
        | obj(esk44_3(X299,X300,X301),X300) )
      & ( ~ subr(X299,sub_0)
        | ~ arg2(X299,X301)
        | ~ arg1(X299,X300)
        | mcont(esk44_3(X299,X300,X301),esk45_3(X299,X300,X301)) )
      & ( ~ subr(X299,sub_0)
        | ~ arg2(X299,X301)
        | ~ arg1(X299,X300)
        | hsit(X299,esk44_3(X299,X300,X301)) )
      & ( ~ subr(X299,sub_0)
        | ~ arg2(X299,X301)
        | ~ arg1(X299,X300)
        | arg2(esk45_3(X299,X300,X301),esk46_3(X299,X300,X301)) )
      & ( ~ subr(X299,sub_0)
        | ~ arg2(X299,X301)
        | ~ arg1(X299,X300)
        | arg1(esk45_3(X299,X300,X301),X300) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sub__bezeichnen_1_1_als])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( ~ obj(X3,c11965)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | obj(esk44_3(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X363,X364] :
      ( ( ~ sub(X363,X364)
        | subr(esk49_2(X363,X364),sub_0) )
      & ( ~ sub(X363,X364)
        | arg2(esk49_2(X363,X364),X364) )
      & ( ~ sub(X363,X364)
        | arg1(esk49_2(X363,X364),X363) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sub__sub_0_expansion])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    ( ~ arg1(X1,c11965)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X4)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | subr(esk49_2(X1,X2),sub_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X3,X4)
    | ~ arg1(esk49_2(X3,X4),c11965)
    | ~ arg2(esk49_2(X3,X4),X5)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | arg1(esk49_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(c11965,X3)
    | ~ arg2(esk49_2(c11965,X3),X4)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | arg2(esk49_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(c11965,X3)
    | ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    ~ attr(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR115+60 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/10.40  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/10.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/10.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/10.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/10.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/10.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/10.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/10.40  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:09:40 UTC 2026
% 0.13/10.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/10.40  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/10.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/10.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/10.92  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/10.92  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/10.92  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2179280 completed with status 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.16/10.92  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/10.92  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/10.92  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.16/10.92  % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/10.92  % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/10.92  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2179289 completed with status 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/10.92  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/10.92  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/10.92  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.16/10.92  % Search class: FHHNS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/10.92  % partial match(2): FHHNS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/10.92  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.92  % Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 0.16/10.92  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/10.92  
% 0.16/10.92  % Proof found!
% 0.16/10.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/10.92  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/10.92  % Parsed axioms                        : 10189
% 0.16/10.92  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 9941
% 0.16/10.92  % Initial clauses                      : 548
% 0.16/10.92  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 548
% 0.16/10.92  % Processed clauses                    : 1124
% 0.16/10.92  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.16/10.92  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1122
% 0.16/10.92  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Backward-subsumed                    : 29
% 0.16/10.92  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Generated clauses                    : 528
% 0.16/10.92  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 526
% 0.16/10.92  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Paramodulations                      : 526
% 0.16/10.92  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.16/10.92  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/10.92  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/10.92  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/10.92  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/10.92  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/10.92  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/10.92  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/10.92  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/10.92  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/10.92  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/10.92  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/10.92  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/10.92  % Current number of processed clauses  : 543
% 0.16/10.92  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 337
% 0.16/10.92  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/10.92  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.16/10.92  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 205
% 0.16/10.92  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 498
% 0.16/10.92  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1642
% 0.16/10.92  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Current number of archived clauses   : 579
% 0.16/10.92  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 36308
% 0.16/10.92  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18615
% 0.16/10.92  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.16/10.92  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 303
% 0.16/10.92  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/10.92  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 76349
% 0.16/10.92  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 40675
% 0.16/10.92  
% 0.16/10.92  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/10.92  % User time                : 0.179 s
% 0.16/10.92  % System time              : 0.120 s
% 0.16/10.92  % Total time               : 0.299 s
% 0.16/10.92  % Maximum resident set size: 50216 pages
% 0.16/10.92  
% 0.16/10.92  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/10.92  % User time                : 0.806 s
% 0.16/10.92  % System time              : 0.405 s
% 0.16/10.92  % Total time               : 1.211 s
% 0.16/10.92  % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 0.16/10.92  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------