%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+62 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.78s 2.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 23 unt; 0 nHn; 35 RR)
% Number of literals : 120 ( 0 equ; 95 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 14 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 12 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_702,negated_conjecture,
( ~ agt(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ val(X4,X8)
| ~ temp(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ has_card_leq(X8,int1994) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_702) ).
cnf(i_0_524,plain,
( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ card(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_524) ).
cnf(i_0_54,hypothesis,
card(c4,int1994),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_54) ).
cnf(i_0_204,hypothesis,
sub(c129,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_204) ).
cnf(i_0_203,hypothesis,
val(c129,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_203) ).
cnf(i_0_205,hypothesis,
sub(c128,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_205) ).
cnf(i_0_206,hypothesis,
attr(c128,c129),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_206) ).
cnf(i_0_194,hypothesis,
sub(c8,jahr__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_194) ).
cnf(i_0_193,hypothesis,
val(c8,c4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_193) ).
cnf(i_0_208,hypothesis,
subs(c126,n374bernehmen_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_208) ).
cnf(i_0_207,hypothesis,
temp(c126,c7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_207) ).
cnf(i_0_195,hypothesis,
attr(c7,c8),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_195) ).
cnf(i_0_211,hypothesis,
agt(c126,c128),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k6g88j09/lgb.p',i_0_211) ).
cnf(c_0_716,negated_conjecture,
( ~ agt(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ val(X4,X8)
| ~ temp(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ has_card_leq(X8,int1994) ),
i_0_702 ).
cnf(c_0_717,plain,
( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ card(X1,X2) ),
i_0_524 ).
cnf(c_0_718,plain,
( ~ card(X1,int1994)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,jahr__1_1)
| ~ subs(X6,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ temp(X6,X7)
| ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X3,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X5,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X3)
| ~ attr(X7,X5)
| ~ attr(X8,X2)
| ~ agt(X6,X8) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_716,c_0_717]) ).
cnf(c_0_719,hypothesis,
card(c4,int1994),
i_0_54 ).
cnf(c_0_720,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ subs(X5,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ temp(X5,X6)
| ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X4,c4)
| ~ attr(X3,X2)
| ~ attr(X6,X4)
| ~ attr(X7,X1)
| ~ agt(X5,X7) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_718,c_0_719]) ).
cnf(c_0_721,hypothesis,
sub(c129,name_1_1),
i_0_204 ).
cnf(c_0_722,hypothesis,
val(c129,bmw_0),
i_0_203 ).
cnf(c_0_723,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,jahr__1_1)
| ~ subs(X4,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ temp(X4,X5)
| ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X3,c4)
| ~ attr(X6,c129)
| ~ attr(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X5,X3)
| ~ agt(X4,X6) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_720,c_0_721]),c_0_722])]) ).
cnf(c_0_724,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
| ~ subs(X3,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ temp(X3,X4)
| ~ val(X2,c4)
| ~ attr(X5,c129)
| ~ attr(X1,c129)
| ~ attr(X4,X2)
| ~ agt(X3,X5) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_723,c_0_721]),c_0_722])]) ).
cnf(c_0_725,hypothesis,
sub(c128,firma_1_1),
i_0_205 ).
cnf(c_0_726,hypothesis,
attr(c128,c129),
i_0_206 ).
cnf(c_0_727,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ temp(X2,X3)
| ~ val(X1,c4)
| ~ attr(X4,c129)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ agt(X2,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_724,c_0_725]),c_0_726])]) ).
cnf(c_0_728,hypothesis,
sub(c8,jahr__1_1),
i_0_194 ).
cnf(c_0_729,hypothesis,
val(c8,c4),
i_0_193 ).
cnf(c_0_730,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,n374bernehmen_1_1)
| ~ temp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,c129)
| ~ attr(X2,c8)
| ~ agt(X1,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_727,c_0_728]),c_0_729])]) ).
cnf(c_0_731,hypothesis,
subs(c126,n374bernehmen_1_1),
i_0_208 ).
cnf(c_0_732,hypothesis,
( ~ temp(c126,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,c129)
| ~ attr(X1,c8)
| ~ agt(c126,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_730,c_0_731]) ).
cnf(c_0_733,hypothesis,
temp(c126,c7),
i_0_207 ).
cnf(c_0_734,hypothesis,
attr(c7,c8),
i_0_195 ).
cnf(c_0_735,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c129)
| ~ agt(c126,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_732,c_0_733]),c_0_734])]) ).
cnf(c_0_736,hypothesis,
agt(c126,c128),
i_0_211 ).
cnf(c_0_737,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_735,c_0_736]),c_0_726])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : CSR115+62 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.11 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 20:32:38 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.58 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.78/2.58 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.78/2.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.78/2.58 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.78/2.58 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.78/2.58 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.78/2.58 #
% 7.78/2.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 7.78/2.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.78/2.58
% 7.78/2.58 # Proof found!
% 7.78/2.58 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.78/2.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.78/2.58 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.78/2.58
% 7.78/2.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.78/2.58 # User time : 0.021 s
% 7.78/2.58 # System time : 0.008 s
% 7.78/2.58 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.78/2.58 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.78/2.58
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------