%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+70 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.97s 2.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 78 ( 0 equ; 61 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 37 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_613,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amx1z5yp/lgb.p',i_0_613) ).
cnf(i_0_123,hypothesis,
val(c41,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amx1z5yp/lgb.p',i_0_123) ).
cnf(i_0_124,hypothesis,
sub(c41,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amx1z5yp/lgb.p',i_0_124) ).
cnf(i_0_125,hypothesis,
sub(c40,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amx1z5yp/lgb.p',i_0_125) ).
cnf(i_0_126,hypothesis,
attr(c40,c41),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amx1z5yp/lgb.p',i_0_126) ).
cnf(i_0_592,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amx1z5yp/lgb.p',i_0_592) ).
cnf(i_0_609,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amx1z5yp/lgb.p',i_0_609) ).
cnf(i_0_611,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amx1z5yp/lgb.p',i_0_611) ).
cnf(i_0_610,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amx1z5yp/lgb.p',i_0_610) ).
cnf(c_0_623,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_613 ).
cnf(c_0_624,hypothesis,
val(c41,bmw_0),
i_0_123 ).
cnf(c_0_625,hypothesis,
sub(c41,name_1_1),
i_0_124 ).
cnf(c_0_626,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c41)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_623,c_0_624]),c_0_625])]) ).
cnf(c_0_627,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c41)
| ~ attr(X2,c41)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_626,c_0_624]),c_0_625])]) ).
cnf(c_0_628,hypothesis,
sub(c40,firma_1_1),
i_0_125 ).
cnf(c_0_629,hypothesis,
attr(c40,c41),
i_0_126 ).
cnf(c_0_630,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c41)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c40) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_627,c_0_628]),c_0_629])]) ).
cnf(c_0_631,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c40) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_630,c_0_629]) ).
cnf(c_0_632,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_592 ).
cnf(c_0_633,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c40)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_631,c_0_632]) ).
cnf(c_0_634,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_609 ).
cnf(c_0_635,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c40)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_633,c_0_634]) ).
cnf(c_0_636,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_611 ).
cnf(c_0_637,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c40,X1),X2)
| ~ sub(c40,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_635,c_0_636]) ).
cnf(c_0_638,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_610 ).
cnf(c_0_639,plain,
( ~ sub(c40,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_637,c_0_638]) ).
cnf(c_0_640,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_639,c_0_628]) ).
cnf(c_0_641,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_629,c_0_640]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+70 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 13:01:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.60 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.97/2.57 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.97/2.57 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.97/2.57 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.97/2.57 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 6.97/2.57 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 6.97/2.57 #
% 6.97/2.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 6.97/2.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.97/2.57
% 6.97/2.57 # Proof found!
% 6.97/2.57 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.97/2.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.97/2.57 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.97/2.57
% 6.97/2.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.97/2.57 # User time : 0.047 s
% 6.97/2.57 # System time : 0.007 s
% 6.97/2.57 # Total time : 0.054 s
% 6.97/2.57 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 6.97/2.57
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------