↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR115+73 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.51s 2.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  30 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   80 (   0 equ;  61 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (  37 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_665,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X2,X7)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_665) ).

cnf(i_0_180,hypothesis,
    val(c4105,bmw_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_180) ).

cnf(i_0_181,hypothesis,
    sub(c4105,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_181) ).

cnf(i_0_182,hypothesis,
    sub(c4104,firma_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_182) ).

cnf(i_0_183,hypothesis,
    attr(c4104,c4105),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_183) ).

cnf(i_0_644,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_644) ).

cnf(i_0_661,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_661) ).

cnf(i_0_663,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_663) ).

cnf(i_0_662,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_662) ).

cnf(i_0_177,hypothesis,
    attr(c4127,c4128),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ioyh51e2/lgb.p',i_0_177) ).

cnf(c_0_676,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ obj(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X5,X6)
    | ~ attr(X2,X7)
    | ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
    | ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
    i_0_665 ).

cnf(c_0_677,hypothesis,
    val(c4105,bmw_0),
    i_0_180 ).

cnf(c_0_678,hypothesis,
    sub(c4105,name_1_1),
    i_0_181 ).

cnf(c_0_679,hypothesis,
    ( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X2,c4105)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5)
    | ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_676,c_0_677]),c_0_678])]) ).

cnf(c_0_680,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X1,c4105)
    | ~ attr(X2,c4105)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_679,c_0_677]),c_0_678])]) ).

cnf(c_0_681,hypothesis,
    sub(c4104,firma_1_1),
    i_0_182 ).

cnf(c_0_682,hypothesis,
    attr(c4104,c4105),
    i_0_183 ).

cnf(c_0_683,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c4105)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ obj(X4,c4104) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_680,c_0_681]),c_0_682])]) ).

cnf(c_0_684,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ obj(X3,c4104) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_683,c_0_682]) ).

cnf(c_0_685,plain,
    ( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X3)
    | ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
    i_0_644 ).

cnf(c_0_686,plain,
    ( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
    | ~ arg2(X1,X2)
    | ~ arg1(X1,c4104)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_684,c_0_685]) ).

cnf(c_0_687,plain,
    ( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_661 ).

cnf(c_0_688,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c4104)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_686,c_0_687]) ).

cnf(c_0_689,plain,
    ( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_663 ).

cnf(c_0_690,plain,
    ( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c4104,X1),X2)
    | ~ sub(c4104,X1)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_688,c_0_689]) ).

cnf(c_0_691,plain,
    ( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_662 ).

cnf(c_0_692,plain,
    ( ~ sub(c4104,X1)
    | ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_690,c_0_691]) ).

cnf(c_0_693,hypothesis,
    attr(c4127,c4128),
    i_0_177 ).

cnf(c_0_694,hypothesis,
    ~ attr(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_692,c_0_681]) ).

cnf(c_0_695,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_693,c_0_694]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : CSR115+73 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 06:46:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.36/0.59  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.36/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.36/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 6.51/2.65  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.51/2.65  # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.51/2.65  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.51/2.65  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 6.51/2.65  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 6.51/2.65  #
% 6.51/2.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 6.51/2.65  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.51/2.65  
% 6.51/2.65  # Proof found!
% 6.51/2.65  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.51/2.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.51/2.65  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.51/2.65  
% 6.51/2.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.51/2.65  # User time                : 0.045 s
% 6.51/2.65  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 6.51/2.65  # Total time               : 0.049 s
% 6.51/2.65  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 6.51/2.65  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------