%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+82 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.93s 0.96s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 148 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 101 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 158 ( 26 ~; 19 |; 112 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 101 ( 11 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 19 ( 18 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 34 ( 34 usr; 33 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 45 ( 12 sgn 10 !; 13 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495,conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( sub(X3,name_1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& attr(X5,X6)
& attr(X4,X3)
& attr(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495,hypothesis,
( gener(einl__344uten_1_1,ge)
& fact(einl__344uten_1_1,real)
& sort(einl__344uten_1_1,dn)
& varia(c373,con)
& refer(c373,det)
& quant(c373,one)
& gener(c373,sp)
& fact(c373,real)
& etype(c373,int0)
& card(c373,int1)
& sort(c373,l)
& gener(c368,sp)
& fact(c368,real)
& sort(c368,dn)
& varia(bereich_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(bereich_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(bereich_1_1,one)
& gener(bereich_1_1,ge)
& fact(bereich_1_1,real)
& etype(bereich_1_1,int0)
& card(bereich_1_1,int1)
& sort(bereich_1_1,d)
& varia(c364,varia_c)
& refer(c364,refer_c)
& quant(c364,one)
& gener(c364,sp)
& fact(c364,real)
& etype(c364,int0)
& card(c364,int1)
& sort(c364,d)
& varia(mountain_bike_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(mountain_bike_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(mountain_bike_1_1,one)
& gener(mountain_bike_1_1,ge)
& fact(mountain_bike_1_1,real)
& etype(mountain_bike_1_1,int0)
& card(mountain_bike_1_1,int1)
& sort(mountain_bike_1_1,d)
& varia(c362,con)
& refer(c362,det)
& quant(c362,one)
& gener(c362,sp)
& fact(c362,real)
& etype(c362,int0)
& card(c362,int1)
& sort(c362,d)
& sort(freeride_____344ra_0,fe)
& varia(c358,varia_c)
& refer(c358,refer_c)
& quant(c358,one)
& gener(c358,sp)
& fact(c358,hypo)
& etype(c358,int0)
& card(c358,int1)
& sort(c358,o)
& sort(marzocchi_0,fe)
& varia(familiename_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(familiename_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(familiename_1_1,one)
& gener(familiename_1_1,ge)
& fact(familiename_1_1,real)
& etype(familiename_1_1,int0)
& card(familiename_1_1,int1)
& sort(familiename_1_1,na)
& varia(mensch_1_1,varia_c)
& refer(mensch_1_1,refer_c)
& quant(mensch_1_1,one)
& gener(mensch_1_1,ge)
& fact(mensch_1_1,real)
& etype(mensch_1_1,int0)
& card(mensch_1_1,int1)
& sort(mensch_1_1,d)
& varia(c342,varia_c)
& refer(c342,indet)
& quant(c342,one)
& gener(c342,sp)
& fact(c342,real)
& etype(c342,int0)
& card(c342,int1)
& sort(c342,na)
& varia(c341,con)
& refer(c341,det)
& quant(c341,one)
& gener(c341,sp)
& fact(c341,real)
& etype(c341,int0)
& card(c341,int1)
& sort(c341,d)
& in(c373,c362)
& subs(c368,einl__344uten_1_1)
& mcont(c368,c358)
& loc(c368,c373)
& exp(c368,c341)
& benf(c368,c364)
& sub(c364,bereich_1_1)
& sub(c362,mountain_bike_1_1)
& name(c358,freeride_____344ra_0)
& val(c342,marzocchi_0)
& sub(c342,familiename_1_1)
& sub(c341,mensch_1_1)
& attr(c341,c342) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495) ).
fof(name_rel__attr_val_name_1_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( name(X2,X1)
=> ? [X3] :
( val(X3,X1)
& sub(X3,name_1_1)
& attr(X2,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',name_rel__attr_val_name_1_1) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( sub(X3,name_1_1)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& attr(X5,X6)
& attr(X4,X3)
& attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
( ~ sub(X10,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X12,X13)
| ~ attr(X11,X10)
| ~ attr(X8,X9) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
attr(c341,c342),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X93,X94] :
( ( ~ name(X94,X93)
| val(esk8_2(X93,X94),X93) )
& ( ~ name(X94,X93)
| sub(esk8_2(X93,X94),name_1_1) )
& ( ~ name(X94,X93)
| attr(X94,esk8_2(X93,X94)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[name_rel__attr_val_name_1_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ name(X1,X2)
| attr(X1,esk8_2(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ name(X2,X1)
| sub(esk8_2(X1,X2),name_1_1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ name(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
name(c358,freeride_____344ra_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
~ name(X1,X2),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR115+82 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:09:46 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/0.96 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.93/0.96 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.93/0.96 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % new_bool_1 with pid 406050 completed with status 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.93/0.96 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.93/0.96 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.93/0.96 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.93/0.96 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.93/0.96 % partial match(1): FHHNS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.93/0.96 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % SubtermCWHack with pid 406052 completed with status 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.93/0.96 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.93/0.96 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.93/0.96 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.93/0.96 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.93/0.96 % partial match(1): FHHNS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.93/0.96 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.93/0.96 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.93/0.96 % Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.93/0.96
% 0.93/0.96 % Proof found!
% 0.93/0.96 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.93/0.96 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.93/0.96 % Parsed axioms : 10189
% 0.93/0.96 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 10125
% 0.93/0.96 % Initial clauses : 198
% 0.93/0.96 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Initial clauses in saturation : 198
% 0.93/0.96 % Processed clauses : 225
% 0.93/0.96 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % ...subsumed : 7
% 0.93/0.96 % ...remaining for further processing : 218
% 0.93/0.96 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Backward-subsumed : 12
% 0.93/0.96 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Generated clauses : 102
% 0.93/0.96 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 93
% 0.93/0.96 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.93/0.96 % Paramodulations : 101
% 0.93/0.96 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % NegExts : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.93/0.96 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.93/0.97 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.93/0.97 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.93/0.97 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.93/0.97 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.93/0.97 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.93/0.97 % Current number of processed clauses : 205
% 0.93/0.97 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 121
% 0.93/0.97 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.93/0.97 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.93/0.97 % Non-unit-clauses : 82
% 0.93/0.97 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65
% 0.93/0.97 % ...number of literals in the above : 279
% 0.93/0.97 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.93/0.97 % Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.93/0.97 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1479
% 0.93/0.97 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1136
% 0.93/0.97 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 0.93/0.97 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.93/0.97 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.93/0.97 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.93/0.97 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.93/0.97 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.93/0.97 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.93/0.97 % Termbank termtop insertions : 52550
% 0.93/0.97 % Search garbage collected termcells : 39202
% 0.93/0.97
% 0.93/0.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.93/0.97 % User time : 0.085 s
% 0.93/0.97 % System time : 0.078 s
% 0.93/0.97 % Total time : 0.162 s
% 0.93/0.97 % Maximum resident set size: 44956 pages
% 0.93/0.97
% 0.93/0.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.93/0.97 % User time : 0.173 s
% 0.93/0.97 % System time : 0.102 s
% 0.93/0.97 % Total time : 0.276 s
% 0.93/0.97 % Maximum resident set size: 14336 pages
% 0.93/0.97 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------