%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+87 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.92s 2.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 80 ( 0 equ; 61 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 37 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_717,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_717) ).
cnf(i_0_229,hypothesis,
val(c126,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_229) ).
cnf(i_0_230,hypothesis,
sub(c126,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_230) ).
cnf(i_0_231,hypothesis,
sub(c125,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_231) ).
cnf(i_0_232,hypothesis,
attr(c125,c126),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_232) ).
cnf(i_0_696,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_696) ).
cnf(i_0_713,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_713) ).
cnf(i_0_715,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_715) ).
cnf(i_0_714,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_714) ).
cnf(i_0_236,hypothesis,
attr(c109,c110),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wiuyglmn/lgb.p',i_0_236) ).
cnf(c_0_728,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_717 ).
cnf(c_0_729,hypothesis,
val(c126,bmw_0),
i_0_229 ).
cnf(c_0_730,hypothesis,
sub(c126,name_1_1),
i_0_230 ).
cnf(c_0_731,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c126)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_728,c_0_729]),c_0_730])]) ).
cnf(c_0_732,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c126)
| ~ attr(X2,c126)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_731,c_0_729]),c_0_730])]) ).
cnf(c_0_733,hypothesis,
sub(c125,firma_1_1),
i_0_231 ).
cnf(c_0_734,hypothesis,
attr(c125,c126),
i_0_232 ).
cnf(c_0_735,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c126)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c125) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_732,c_0_733]),c_0_734])]) ).
cnf(c_0_736,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c125) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_735,c_0_734]) ).
cnf(c_0_737,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_696 ).
cnf(c_0_738,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c125)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_736,c_0_737]) ).
cnf(c_0_739,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_713 ).
cnf(c_0_740,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c125)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_738,c_0_739]) ).
cnf(c_0_741,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_715 ).
cnf(c_0_742,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c125,X1),X2)
| ~ sub(c125,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_740,c_0_741]) ).
cnf(c_0_743,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_714 ).
cnf(c_0_744,plain,
( ~ sub(c125,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_742,c_0_743]) ).
cnf(c_0_745,hypothesis,
attr(c109,c110),
i_0_236 ).
cnf(c_0_746,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_744,c_0_733]) ).
cnf(c_0_747,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_745,c_0_746]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+87 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 04:24:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.43/0.62 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.43/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.43/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.92/2.80 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 5.92/2.80 # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.92/2.80 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.92/2.80 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.92/2.80 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 5.92/2.80 #
% 5.92/2.80 # Preprocessing time : 0.031 s
% 5.92/2.80 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.92/2.80
% 5.92/2.80 # Proof found!
% 5.92/2.80 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.92/2.80 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.92/2.80 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.92/2.80
% 5.92/2.80 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.92/2.80 # User time : 0.057 s
% 5.92/2.80 # System time : 0.010 s
% 5.92/2.80 # Total time : 0.066 s
% 5.92/2.80 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 5.92/2.80
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------