%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+93 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.27s 3.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 75 ( 0 equ; 56 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 24 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1099,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_1099) ).
cnf(i_0_546,hypothesis,
sub(c816,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_546) ).
cnf(i_0_567,hypothesis,
sub(c757,jahr__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_567) ).
cnf(i_0_548,hypothesis,
attr(c815,c816),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_548) ).
cnf(i_0_568,hypothesis,
attr(c756,c757),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_568) ).
cnf(i_0_1078,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_1078) ).
cnf(i_0_1095,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_1095) ).
cnf(i_0_1096,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_1096) ).
cnf(i_0_1097,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_1097) ).
cnf(i_0_547,hypothesis,
sub(c815,erzeugnis_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9sbm7w66/lgb.p',i_0_547) ).
cnf(c_0_1110,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1) ),
i_0_1099 ).
cnf(c_0_1111,hypothesis,
sub(c816,name_1_1),
i_0_546 ).
cnf(c_0_1112,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
| ~ attr(X3,c816)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ obj(X6,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1110,c_0_1111]) ).
cnf(c_0_1113,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c816)
| ~ attr(X3,c816)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ obj(X5,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1112,c_0_1111]) ).
cnf(c_0_1114,hypothesis,
sub(c757,jahr__1_1),
i_0_567 ).
cnf(c_0_1115,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c816)
| ~ attr(X2,c816)
| ~ attr(X3,c757)
| ~ obj(X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1113,c_0_1114]) ).
cnf(c_0_1116,hypothesis,
attr(c815,c816),
i_0_548 ).
cnf(c_0_1117,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c816)
| ~ attr(X2,c757)
| ~ obj(X3,c815) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1115,c_0_1116]) ).
cnf(c_0_1118,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c757)
| ~ obj(X2,c815) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1117,c_0_1116]) ).
cnf(c_0_1119,hypothesis,
attr(c756,c757),
i_0_568 ).
cnf(c_0_1120,hypothesis,
~ obj(X1,c815),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1118,c_0_1119]) ).
cnf(c_0_1121,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_1078 ).
cnf(c_0_1122,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c815) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1120,c_0_1121]) ).
cnf(c_0_1123,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1095 ).
cnf(c_0_1124,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c815)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1122,c_0_1123]) ).
cnf(c_0_1125,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1096 ).
cnf(c_0_1126,plain,
( ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c815)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1124,c_0_1125]) ).
cnf(c_0_1127,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1097 ).
cnf(c_0_1128,hypothesis,
sub(c815,erzeugnis_1_1),
i_0_547 ).
cnf(c_0_1129,plain,
~ sub(c815,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1126,c_0_1127]) ).
cnf(c_0_1130,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_1128,c_0_1129]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : CSR115+93 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 19:32:38 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.41 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.58 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 11.27/3.60 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 11.27/3.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.27/3.60 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 11.27/3.60 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 11.27/3.60 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 11.27/3.60 #
% 11.27/3.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 11.27/3.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.27/3.60
% 11.27/3.60 # Proof found!
% 11.27/3.60 # SZS status Theorem
% 11.27/3.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.27/3.60 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.27/3.60
% 11.27/3.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.27/3.60 # User time : 0.071 s
% 11.27/3.60 # System time : 0.012 s
% 11.27/3.60 # Total time : 0.083 s
% 11.27/3.60 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 11.27/3.60
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------