%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR116+41 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.22s 2.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 21
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 56 ( 30 unt; 0 nHn; 54 RR)
% Number of literals : 203 ( 0 equ; 162 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 22 ( 22 usr; 19 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 111 ( 24 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_787,negated_conjecture,
( ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,X4)
| ~ arg1(X5,X4)
| ~ arg2(X5,X1)
| ~ attr(X6,X7)
| ~ attr(X4,X8)
| ~ attr(X4,X9)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,familiename_1_1)
| ~ prop(X1,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ subr(X5,rprs_0)
| ~ val(X7,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ val(X8,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X9,mandela_0)
| ~ pmod(X2,erst_1_1,pr__344sident_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_787) ).
cnf(i_0_294,hypothesis,
pmod(c151,erst_1_1,pr__344sident_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_294) ).
cnf(i_0_280,hypothesis,
val(c163,mandela_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_280) ).
cnf(i_0_281,hypothesis,
sub(c163,familiename_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_281) ).
cnf(i_0_282,hypothesis,
val(c162,nelson_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_282) ).
cnf(i_0_283,hypothesis,
sub(c162,eigenname_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_283) ).
cnf(i_0_289,hypothesis,
val(c156,s__374dafrika_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_289) ).
cnf(i_0_290,hypothesis,
sub(c156,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_290) ).
cnf(i_0_287,hypothesis,
attr(c161,c163),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_287) ).
cnf(i_0_288,hypothesis,
attr(c161,c162),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_288) ).
cnf(i_0_292,hypothesis,
attr(c155,c156),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_292) ).
cnf(i_0_624,plain,
( subr(esk22_3(X1,X2,X3),rprs_0)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,hei__337en_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_624) ).
cnf(i_0_629,plain,
( arg1(esk22_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,hei__337en_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_629) ).
cnf(i_0_628,plain,
( arg2(esk22_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,hei__337en_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_628) ).
cnf(i_0_285,hypothesis,
prop(c161,schwarz_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_285) ).
cnf(i_0_284,hypothesis,
sub(c161,c151),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_284) ).
cnf(i_0_38,plain,
( arg2(esk7_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_38) ).
cnf(i_0_37,plain,
( subs(esk7_3(X1,X2,X3),hei__337en_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_39,plain,
( arg1(esk7_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_39) ).
cnf(i_0_657,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_657) ).
cnf(i_0_299,hypothesis,
obj(c11,c161),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jxb2xwjn/input.p',i_0_299) ).
cnf(c_0_809,negated_conjecture,
( ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,X4)
| ~ arg1(X5,X4)
| ~ arg2(X5,X1)
| ~ attr(X6,X7)
| ~ attr(X4,X8)
| ~ attr(X4,X9)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X8,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X9,familiename_1_1)
| ~ prop(X1,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ subr(X5,rprs_0)
| ~ val(X7,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ val(X8,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X9,mandela_0)
| ~ pmod(X2,erst_1_1,pr__344sident_1_1) ),
i_0_787 ).
cnf(c_0_810,hypothesis,
pmod(c151,erst_1_1,pr__344sident_1_1),
i_0_294 ).
cnf(c_0_811,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,mandela_0)
| ~ val(X2,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X3,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ attr(X4,X3)
| ~ attr(X5,X1)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ subr(X6,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X7,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ arg2(X6,X7)
| ~ arg1(X6,X5)
| ~ obj(X8,X5)
| ~ sub(X1,familiename_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,c151) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_809,c_0_810]) ).
cnf(c_0_812,hypothesis,
val(c163,mandela_0),
i_0_280 ).
cnf(c_0_813,hypothesis,
sub(c163,familiename_1_1),
i_0_281 ).
cnf(c_0_814,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,nelson_0)
| ~ val(X2,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ attr(X3,c163)
| ~ attr(X4,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ subr(X5,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X6,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ arg2(X5,X6)
| ~ arg1(X5,X3)
| ~ obj(X7,X3)
| ~ sub(X1,eigenname_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,c151) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_811,c_0_812]),c_0_813])]) ).
cnf(c_0_815,hypothesis,
val(c162,nelson_0),
i_0_282 ).
cnf(c_0_816,hypothesis,
sub(c162,eigenname_1_1),
i_0_283 ).
cnf(c_0_817,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,s__374dafrika_0)
| ~ attr(X2,c163)
| ~ attr(X2,c162)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ subr(X4,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X5,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ arg2(X4,X5)
| ~ arg1(X4,X2)
| ~ obj(X6,X2)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,c151) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_814,c_0_815]),c_0_816])]) ).
cnf(c_0_818,hypothesis,
val(c156,s__374dafrika_0),
i_0_289 ).
cnf(c_0_819,hypothesis,
sub(c156,name_1_1),
i_0_290 ).
cnf(c_0_820,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c163)
| ~ attr(X1,c162)
| ~ attr(X2,c156)
| ~ subr(X3,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X4,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ arg2(X3,X4)
| ~ arg1(X3,X1)
| ~ obj(X5,X1)
| ~ sub(X4,c151) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_817,c_0_818]),c_0_819])]) ).
cnf(c_0_821,hypothesis,
attr(c161,c163),
i_0_287 ).
cnf(c_0_822,hypothesis,
attr(c161,c162),
i_0_288 ).
cnf(c_0_823,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c156)
| ~ subr(X2,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X3,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ arg2(X2,X3)
| ~ arg1(X2,c161)
| ~ obj(X4,c161)
| ~ sub(X3,c151) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_820,c_0_821]),c_0_822])]) ).
cnf(c_0_824,hypothesis,
attr(c155,c156),
i_0_292 ).
cnf(c_0_825,hypothesis,
( ~ subr(X1,rprs_0)
| ~ prop(X2,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c161)
| ~ obj(X3,c161)
| ~ sub(X2,c151) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_823,c_0_824]) ).
cnf(c_0_826,plain,
( subr(esk22_3(X1,X2,X3),rprs_0)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,hei__337en_1_1) ),
i_0_624 ).
cnf(c_0_827,plain,
( ~ prop(X1,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ arg2(esk22_3(X2,X3,X4),X1)
| ~ arg2(X2,X4)
| ~ arg1(esk22_3(X2,X3,X4),c161)
| ~ arg1(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X5,c161)
| ~ sub(X1,c151)
| ~ subs(X2,hei__337en_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_825,c_0_826]) ).
cnf(c_0_828,plain,
( arg1(esk22_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,hei__337en_1_1) ),
i_0_629 ).
cnf(c_0_829,plain,
( ~ prop(X1,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ arg2(esk22_3(X2,c161,X3),X1)
| ~ arg2(X2,X3)
| ~ arg1(X2,c161)
| ~ obj(X4,c161)
| ~ sub(X1,c151)
| ~ subs(X2,hei__337en_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_827,c_0_828]) ).
cnf(c_0_830,plain,
( arg2(esk22_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,hei__337en_1_1) ),
i_0_628 ).
cnf(c_0_831,plain,
( ~ prop(X1,schwarz_1_1)
| ~ arg2(X2,X1)
| ~ arg1(X2,c161)
| ~ obj(X3,c161)
| ~ sub(X1,c151)
| ~ subs(X2,hei__337en_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_829,c_0_830]) ).
cnf(c_0_832,hypothesis,
prop(c161,schwarz_1_1),
i_0_285 ).
cnf(c_0_833,hypothesis,
sub(c161,c151),
i_0_284 ).
cnf(c_0_834,hypothesis,
( ~ arg2(X1,c161)
| ~ arg1(X1,c161)
| ~ obj(X2,c161)
| ~ subs(X1,hei__337en_1_1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_831,c_0_832]),c_0_833])]) ).
cnf(c_0_835,plain,
( arg2(esk7_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_38 ).
cnf(c_0_836,plain,
( subs(esk7_3(X1,X2,X3),hei__337en_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_837,plain,
( arg1(esk7_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_39 ).
cnf(c_0_838,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ attr(c161,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c161)
| ~ sub(X2,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_834,c_0_835]),c_0_836]),c_0_837]) ).
cnf(c_0_839,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_657 ).
cnf(c_0_840,plain,
( ~ attr(c161,X1)
| ~ obj(X2,c161)
| ~ sub(X1,eigenname_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_838,c_0_839]) ).
cnf(c_0_841,hypothesis,
obj(c11,c161),
i_0_299 ).
cnf(c_0_842,hypothesis,
~ obj(X1,c161),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_840,c_0_822]),c_0_816])]) ).
cnf(c_0_843,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_841,c_0_842]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR116+41 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 11:01:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.36/0.62 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.36/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.36/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.22/2.84 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 8.22/2.84 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.22/2.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 8.22/2.84
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof found!
% 8.22/2.84 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.22/2.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object total steps : 56
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object clause steps : 35
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object formula steps : 21
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object initial clauses used : 21
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object initial formulas used : 21
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object generating inferences : 13
% 8.22/2.84 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 15
% 8.22/2.84 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.22/2.84 # Parsed axioms : 807
% 8.22/2.84 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Initial clauses : 807
% 8.22/2.84 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Initial clauses in saturation : 807
% 8.22/2.84 # Processed clauses : 909
% 8.22/2.84 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # ...subsumed : 3
% 8.22/2.84 # ...remaining for further processing : 906
% 8.22/2.84 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 8.22/2.84 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Generated clauses : 1088
% 8.22/2.84 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1072
% 8.22/2.84 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 8.22/2.84 # Paramodulations : 1087
% 8.22/2.84 # Factorizations : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Current number of processed clauses : 900
% 8.22/2.84 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 523
% 8.22/2.84 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 8.22/2.84 # Non-unit-clauses : 376
% 8.22/2.84 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 970
% 8.22/2.84 # ...number of literals in the above : 3160
% 8.22/2.84 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 8.22/2.84 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 36964
% 8.22/2.84 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8883
% 8.22/2.84 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 8.22/2.84 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3117
% 8.22/2.84 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.22/2.84 # Termbank termtop insertions : 29578
% 8.22/2.84
% 8.22/2.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.22/2.84 # User time : 0.056 s
% 8.22/2.84 # System time : 0.004 s
% 8.22/2.84 # Total time : 0.060 s
% 8.22/2.84 # ...preprocessing : 0.021 s
% 8.22/2.84 # ...main loop : 0.039 s
% 8.22/2.84 # Maximum resident set size: 9764 pages
% 8.22/2.84
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------