↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR118+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:17:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 35.29s 11.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 35.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  23   ~;  19   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   2 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
          & s__subclass(X6,X7) )
       => s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
     => ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(abe_mammal,conjecture,
    s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abe_mammal) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_7277,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Hominid,s__Primate),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7277) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_7280,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__Hominid),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7280) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_7267,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Primate,s__Mammal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7267) ).

fof(abe_human,axiom,
    s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Human),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abe_human) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1225,X1226,X1227] :
      ( s__instance(X1227,X1226)
      | ~ s__instance(X1227,X1225)
      | ~ s__subclass(X1225,X1226)
      | ~ s__instance(X1225,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1226,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1223,X1224] :
      ( ( ~ s__subclass(X1223,X1224)
        | s__instance(X1224,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( ~ s__subclass(X1223,X1224)
        | s__instance(X1223,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | s__instance(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[abe_mammal]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Hominid,s__Primate),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7277]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__Hominid),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7280]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Primate,s__Mammal),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7267]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Hominid)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Primate) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Hominid) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Primate)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Mammal) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Primate) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Mammal) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Human),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[abe_human]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR118+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.39  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.40  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:10:55 UTC 2026
% 0.16/5.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/5.40  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 35.29/11.69  % Version: 3.5.1
% 35.29/11.69  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 35.29/11.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2870016 completed with status 0
% 35.29/11.69  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 35.29/11.69  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 35.29/11.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 35.29/11.69  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 35.29/11.69  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 35.29/11.69  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2870091 completed with status 0
% 35.29/11.69  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 35.29/11.69  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 35.29/11.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 35.29/11.69  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 35.29/11.69  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 35.29/11.69  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 35.29/11.69  % Preprocessing time       : 0.083 s
% 35.29/11.69  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 35.29/11.69  
% 35.29/11.69  % Proof found!
% 35.29/11.69  % SZS status Theorem
% 35.29/11.69  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 35.29/11.69  % Parsed axioms                        : 16750
% 35.29/11.69  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 13569
% 35.29/11.69  % Initial clauses                      : 4407
% 35.29/11.69  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 58
% 35.29/11.69  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 4349
% 35.29/11.69  % Processed clauses                    : 14359
% 35.29/11.69  % ...of these trivial                  : 728
% 35.29/11.69  % ...subsumed                          : 551
% 35.29/11.69  % ...remaining for further processing  : 13080
% 35.29/11.69  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 112
% 35.29/11.69  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 35.29/11.69  % Backward-subsumed                    : 168
% 35.29/11.69  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1857
% 35.29/11.69  % Generated clauses                    : 26428
% 35.29/11.69  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23698
% 35.29/11.69  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 35.29/11.69  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 309
% 35.29/11.69  % Paramodulations                      : 26319
% 35.29/11.69  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 35.29/11.69  % NegExts                              : 0
% 35.29/11.69  % Equation resolutions                 : 114
% 35.29/11.69  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 35.29/11.69  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5349
% 35.29/11.69  % ...of those cached                   : 2778
% 35.29/11.69  % Propositional unsat checks           : 2
% 35.29/11.69  %    Propositional check models        : 2
% 35.29/11.69  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 35.29/11.69  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 35.29/11.69  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 35.29/11.69  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 35.29/11.69  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 35.29/11.69  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.045
% 35.29/11.69  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.029
% 35.29/11.69  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 35.29/11.69  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 35.29/11.69  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 35.29/11.69  % Current number of processed clauses  : 6722
% 35.29/11.69  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2089
% 35.29/11.69  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 35.29/11.69  %    Negative unit clauses             : 184
% 35.29/11.69  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4442
% 35.29/11.69  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14733
% 35.29/11.69  % ...number of literals in the above   : 48216
% 35.29/11.69  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 35.29/11.69  % Current number of archived clauses   : 6295
% 35.29/11.69  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6129390
% 35.29/11.69  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2223758
% 35.29/11.69  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 965
% 35.29/11.69  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1125365
% 35.29/11.69  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 155
% 35.29/11.69  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3264
% 35.29/11.69  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1466
% 35.29/11.69  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 35.29/11.69  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 35.29/11.69  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 880186
% 35.29/11.69  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 125873
% 35.29/11.69  
% 35.29/11.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 35.29/11.69  % User time                : 4.812 s
% 35.29/11.69  % System time              : 0.236 s
% 35.29/11.69  % Total time               : 5.048 s
% 35.29/11.69  % Maximum resident set size: 51044 pages
% 35.29/11.69  
% 35.29/11.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 35.29/11.69  % User time                : 23.074 s
% 35.29/11.69  % System time              : 0.907 s
% 35.29/11.69  % Total time               : 23.981 s
% 35.29/11.69  % Maximum resident set size: 21760 pages
% 35.29/11.69  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------