%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR118+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:19:31 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 33.93s 6.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 33.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 53 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(abe_mammal,conjecture,
s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abe_mammal) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7277,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Hominid,s__Primate),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7277) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7280,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Hominid),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7280) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7267,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Primate,s__Mammal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7267) ).
fof(abe_human,axiom,
s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Human),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abe_human) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1225,X1226,X1227] :
( s__instance(X1227,X1226)
| ~ s__instance(X1227,X1225)
| ~ s__subclass(X1225,X1226)
| ~ s__instance(X1225,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1226,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1223,X1224] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X1223,X1224)
| s__instance(X1224,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X1223,X1224)
| s__instance(X1223,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[abe_mammal]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__subclass(s__Hominid,s__Primate),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7277]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Hominid),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7280]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__subclass(s__Primate,s__Mammal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7267]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Hominid)
| s__instance(X1,s__Primate) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
| s__instance(X1,s__Hominid) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Primate)
| s__instance(X1,s__Mammal) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
| s__instance(X1,s__Primate) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Mammal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
| s__instance(X1,s__Mammal) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__instance(s__AbrahamLincoln,s__Human),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[abe_human]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR118+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:10:50 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 33.93/6.27 % Version: 3.5.1
% 33.93/6.27 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 33.93/6.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2869972 completed with status 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 33.93/6.27 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 33.93/6.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 33.93/6.27 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 33.93/6.27 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 33.93/6.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2869988 completed with status 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 33.93/6.27 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 33.93/6.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 33.93/6.27 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 33.93/6.27 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 33.93/6.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 33.93/6.27 % Preprocessing time : 0.087 s
% 33.93/6.27 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 33.93/6.27
% 33.93/6.27 % Proof found!
% 33.93/6.27 % SZS status Theorem
% 33.93/6.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 33.93/6.27 % Parsed axioms : 16750
% 33.93/6.27 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 13569
% 33.93/6.27 % Initial clauses : 4407
% 33.93/6.27 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 58
% 33.93/6.27 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4349
% 33.93/6.27 % Processed clauses : 14304
% 33.93/6.27 % ...of these trivial : 726
% 33.93/6.27 % ...subsumed : 549
% 33.93/6.27 % ...remaining for further processing : 13029
% 33.93/6.27 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 33.93/6.27 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Backward-subsumed : 168
% 33.93/6.27 % Backward-rewritten : 1862
% 33.93/6.27 % Generated clauses : 26344
% 33.93/6.27 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23654
% 33.93/6.27 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 309
% 33.93/6.27 % Paramodulations : 26331
% 33.93/6.27 % Factorizations : 4
% 33.93/6.27 % NegExts : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Equation resolutions : 9
% 33.93/6.27 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Total rewrite steps : 5352
% 33.93/6.27 % ...of those cached : 2780
% 33.93/6.27 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Propositional check models : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 33.93/6.27 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 33.93/6.27 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 33.93/6.27 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 33.93/6.27 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 33.93/6.27 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 33.93/6.27 % Current number of processed clauses : 6724
% 33.93/6.27 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2089
% 33.93/6.27 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 33.93/6.27 % Negative unit clauses : 184
% 33.93/6.27 % Non-unit-clauses : 4444
% 33.93/6.27 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14752
% 33.93/6.27 % ...number of literals in the above : 48448
% 33.93/6.27 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Current number of archived clauses : 6300
% 33.93/6.27 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6061018
% 33.93/6.27 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2210762
% 33.93/6.27 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 963
% 33.93/6.27 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1127967
% 33.93/6.27 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 155
% 33.93/6.27 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3265
% 33.93/6.27 % BW rewrite match successes : 1467
% 33.93/6.27 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Condensation successes : 0
% 33.93/6.27 % Termbank termtop insertions : 822664
% 33.93/6.27 % Search garbage collected termcells : 125873
% 33.93/6.27
% 33.93/6.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 33.93/6.27 % User time : 4.718 s
% 33.93/6.27 % System time : 0.234 s
% 33.93/6.27 % Total time : 4.952 s
% 33.93/6.27 % Maximum resident set size: 51044 pages
% 33.93/6.27
% 33.93/6.27 % -------------------------------------------------
% 33.93/6.27 % User time : 22.063 s
% 33.93/6.27 % System time : 0.875 s
% 33.93/6.27 % Total time : 22.939 s
% 33.93/6.27 % Maximum resident set size: 22272 pages
% 33.93/6.27 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------