%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR118+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:19:31 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 14.34s 4.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 14.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 112 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 138 ( 47 ~; 50 |; 36 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 9 sgn 20 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(abe_mammal,conjecture,
? [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Mammal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abe_mammal) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_39178,axiom,
! [X1645] :
( s__instance(X1645,s__Milk)
=> ? [X196,X1646] :
( s__result(X196,X1645)
& s__instrument(X196,X1646)
& s__attribute(X1646,s__Female)
& s__instance(X1646,s__Mammal)
& s__instance(X196,s__Process)
& s__instance(X1646,s__Object) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_39178) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_42206,axiom,
! [X11] :
( s__instance(X11,s__Butter)
=> ? [X10,X9] :
( s__result(X10,X11)
& s__instance(X9,s__Milk)
& s__resource(X10,X9)
& s__instance(X10,s__Cooking)
& s__instance(X10,s__Process)
& s__instance(X9,s__Object) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_42206) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1138,X136) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X137)
| s__instance(X1139,X136) )
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& s__instance(X1138,X12) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_28506,axiom,
s__instance(s__agent__m,s__CaseRole),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_28506) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Mammal),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[abe_mammal]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2367] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X2367,s__Milk)
| s__result(esk1_1(X2367),X2367) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2367,s__Milk)
| s__instrument(esk1_1(X2367),esk2_1(X2367)) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2367,s__Milk)
| s__attribute(esk2_1(X2367),s__Female) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2367,s__Milk)
| s__instance(esk2_1(X2367),s__Mammal) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2367,s__Milk)
| s__instance(esk1_1(X2367),s__Process) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2367,s__Milk)
| s__instance(esk2_1(X2367),s__Object) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_39178])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X2342] : ~ s__instance(X2342,s__Mammal),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X2548] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X2548,s__Butter)
| s__result(esk22_1(X2548),X2548) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2548,s__Butter)
| s__instance(esk23_1(X2548),s__Milk) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2548,s__Butter)
| s__resource(esk22_1(X2548),esk23_1(X2548)) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2548,s__Butter)
| s__instance(esk22_1(X2548),s__Cooking) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2548,s__Butter)
| s__instance(esk22_1(X2548),s__Process) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2548,s__Butter)
| s__instance(esk23_1(X2548),s__Object) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_42206])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Milk)
| s__instance(esk2_1(X1),s__Mammal) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,s__Mammal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Butter)
| s__instance(esk23_1(X1),s__Milk) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ s__instance(X1,s__Milk),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X2370,X2371,X2372,X2373,X2374,X2375,X2376,X2377,X2378] :
( ( X2377 = s__UnionFn(X2378,X2376)
| ~ s__instance(esk4_3(X2376,X2377,X2378),X2377)
| ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2376,X2377,X2378),X2377)
| ~ s__instance(esk5_3(X2376,X2377,X2378),X2376) )
& ( X2377 = s__UnionFn(X2378,X2376)
| ~ s__instance(esk4_3(X2376,X2377,X2378),X2377)
| ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2376,X2377,X2378),X2377)
| ~ s__instance(esk5_3(X2376,X2377,X2378),X2378) )
& ( X2377 = s__UnionFn(X2378,X2376)
| s__instance(esk5_3(X2376,X2377,X2378),X2377) )
& ( X2377 = s__UnionFn(X2378,X2376)
| s__instance(esk4_3(X2376,X2377,X2378),X2376) )
& ( X2377 = s__UnionFn(X2378,X2376)
| s__instance(esk3_3(X2376,X2377,X2378),X2378) )
& ( X2377 = s__UnionFn(X2378,X2376)
| s__instance(X2376,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2377 = s__UnionFn(X2378,X2376)
| s__instance(X2377,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2377 = s__UnionFn(X2378,X2376)
| s__instance(X2378,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2371 != s__UnionFn(X2372,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2375,X2371)
| ~ s__instance(X2374,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2372)
| s__instance(X2375,X2370)
| s__instance(X2375,X2372) )
& ( X2371 != s__UnionFn(X2372,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2375,X2371)
| ~ s__instance(X2374,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2372)
| s__instance(X2374,X2371) )
& ( X2371 != s__UnionFn(X2372,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2375,X2371)
| ~ s__instance(X2374,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2372)
| s__instance(X2373,X2371) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
~ s__instance(X1,s__Butter),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
| s__instance(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
X1 = s__UnionFn(s__Butter,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s__instance(s__agent__m,s__CaseRole),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_28506]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
~ s__instance(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR118+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:06:12 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 14.34/4.56 % Version: 3.5.1
% 14.34/4.56 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 14.34/4.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % sh5l with pid 2605405 completed with status 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Result found by sh5l
% 14.34/4.56 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 14.34/4.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 14.34/4.56 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 14.34/4.56 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 14.34/4.56 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 14.34/4.56 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2605421 completed with status 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 14.34/4.56 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 14.34/4.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 14.34/4.56 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 14.34/4.56 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 14.34/4.56 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 14.34/4.56 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 14.34/4.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 14.34/4.56 % Preprocessing time : 0.173 s
% 14.34/4.56
% 14.34/4.56 % Proof found!
% 14.34/4.56 % SZS status Theorem
% 14.34/4.56 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.34/4.56 % Parsed axioms : 55588
% 14.34/4.56 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 50576
% 14.34/4.56 % Initial clauses : 8901
% 14.34/4.56 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 451
% 14.34/4.56 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8450
% 14.34/4.56 % Processed clauses : 5750
% 14.34/4.56 % ...of these trivial : 864
% 14.34/4.56 % ...subsumed : 280
% 14.34/4.56 % ...remaining for further processing : 4606
% 14.34/4.56 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 14.34/4.56 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Backward-subsumed : 1490
% 14.34/4.56 % Backward-rewritten : 1271
% 14.34/4.56 % Generated clauses : 31030
% 14.34/4.56 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 29874
% 14.34/4.56 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 14.34/4.56 % Paramodulations : 30714
% 14.34/4.56 % Factorizations : 2
% 14.34/4.56 % NegExts : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Equation resolutions : 8
% 14.34/4.56 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Total rewrite steps : 3052
% 14.34/4.56 % ...of those cached : 1146
% 14.34/4.56 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Propositional check models : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 14.34/4.56 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 14.34/4.56 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 14.34/4.56 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 14.34/4.56 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 14.34/4.56 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 14.34/4.56 % Current number of processed clauses : 1536
% 14.34/4.56 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1378
% 14.34/4.56 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 14.34/4.56 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 14.34/4.56 % Non-unit-clauses : 154
% 14.34/4.56 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20179
% 14.34/4.56 % ...number of literals in the above : 58442
% 14.34/4.56 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Current number of archived clauses : 3067
% 14.34/4.56 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 587410
% 14.34/4.56 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 540653
% 14.34/4.56 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 267
% 14.34/4.56 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 346230
% 14.34/4.56 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 7899
% 14.34/4.56 % BW rewrite match attempts : 20165
% 14.34/4.56 % BW rewrite match successes : 8246
% 14.34/4.56 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Condensation successes : 0
% 14.34/4.56 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1619229
% 14.34/4.56 % Search garbage collected termcells : 409236
% 14.34/4.56
% 14.34/4.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 14.34/4.56 % User time : 1.565 s
% 14.34/4.56 % System time : 0.303 s
% 14.34/4.56 % Total time : 1.868 s
% 14.34/4.56 % Maximum resident set size: 147724 pages
% 14.34/4.56
% 14.34/4.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 14.34/4.56 % User time : 3.567 s
% 14.34/4.56 % System time : 0.425 s
% 14.34/4.56 % Total time : 3.992 s
% 14.34/4.56 % Maximum resident set size: 63488 pages
% 14.34/4.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------