↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR120^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 9.04s 3.25s
% Output   : Refutation 9.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   89 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  233 (  43   ~;  12   |;   4   &; 160   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   17 (  14 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0   ^;  43   !;   5   ?;  48   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(direction_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    direction_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(entails_THFTYPE_IoooI_decl,type,
    entails_THFTYPE_IoooI: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(exactlyLocated_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    exactlyLocated_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(faces_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    faces_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).

thf(lWhereFn_THFTYPE_IiiiI_decl,type,
    lWhereFn_THFTYPE_IiiiI: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_decl,type,
    lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).

thf(lYear_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lYear_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IiIiiIoI_decl,type,
    relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IiIiiIoI: $i > ( $i > $i ) > $o ).

thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $o,B: $o,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ C @ A )
        & ( entails_THFTYPE_IoooI @ A @ B ) )
     => ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ C @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax660) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $o,B: $o,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ C @ A )
        & ( entails_THFTYPE_IoooI @ A @ B ) )
     => ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ C @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( direction_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ C ) )
     => ! [D: $i] :
          ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( direction_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ D ) )
         => ( D = C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1368) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( direction_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ C ) )
     => ! [D: $i] :
          ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( direction_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ D ) )
         => ( D = C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( lWhereFn_THFTYPE_IiiiI @ C @ B )
        = A )
      = ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ ( exactlyLocated_THFTYPE_IiioI @ C @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1726) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( lWhereFn_THFTYPE_IiiiI @ C @ B )
        = A )
      = ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ ( exactlyLocated_THFTYPE_IiioI @ C @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( faces_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ C ) )
     => ! [D: $i] :
          ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( faces_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ D ) )
         => ( D = C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1094) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( faces_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ C ) )
     => ! [D: $i] :
          ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( faces_THFTYPE_IiioI @ B @ D ) )
         => ( D = C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
    @ ~ ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
    @ ~ ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
        | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
          @ ~ ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
              | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[16,12]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
        @ ~ ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
            | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) )
     != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( ( ~ ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
              | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) )
       != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
            | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) )
     != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
            | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[42]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IiIiiIoI @ lYear_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3351) ).

thf(23,plain,
    relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IiIiiIoI @ lYear_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $o] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ~ B )
     => ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax182) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $o] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ~ B )
     => ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( exactlyLocated_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B )
     => ~ ? [C: $i] :
            ( ( exactlyLocated_THFTYPE_IiioI @ C @ B )
            & ( C != A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax180) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( exactlyLocated_THFTYPE_IiioI @ A @ B )
     => ~ ? [C: $i] :
            ( ( exactlyLocated_THFTYPE_IiioI @ C @ B )
            & ( C != A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(119,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[24,20,33,17,44,12,16,11,23,36,13,41]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CSR120^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.08/0.22  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:54:44 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.97/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 3.45/1.53  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (719ms). 
% 3.45/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 4.60/1.93  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 4.60/1.94  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 5.48/2.23  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3578 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 5.70/2.33  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 3570 axioms). 
% 5.70/2.35  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 5.70/2.36  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 5.70/2.36  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 9.04/3.25  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 9.04/3.25  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 9.04/3.25  % Time passed: 2890ms (effective reasoning time: 1703ms)
% 9.04/3.25  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 9.04/3.25  % Axioms used in derivation (8): ax180, ax1094, ax1726, ax182, ax3351, ax, ax1368, ax660
% 9.04/3.25  % No. of inferences in proof: 27
% 9.04/3.25  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2890 ms resp. 1703 ms w/o parsing
% 9.04/3.29  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 9.04/3.29  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------