%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem : CSR122^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 08:43:02 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.33s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : CSR122^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 05:47:33 EST 2026
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.29 Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.38 ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.16/0.38 thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.16/0.38 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.38 % File : CSR122^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.16/0.38 % Domain : Commonsense Reasoning
% 0.16/0.38 % Problem : Do Mary and Sue like Bill in 2009?
% 0.16/0.38 % Version : Especial.
% 0.16/0.38 % English : Mary likes Bill and Sue likes Bill. Does this also hold during
% 0.16/0.38 % year 2009? In order to make this statement provable we assume
% 0.16/0.38 % that 'True' holds during each time context.
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 % Refs : [Ben10] Benzmueller (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.38 % Source : [Ben10]
% 0.16/0.38 % Names : ef_4.tq_SUMO_local [Ben10]
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 % Status : Theorem
% 0.16/0.38 % Rating : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.50 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v4.1.0
% 0.16/0.38 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 2 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% 0.16/0.38 % Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% 0.16/0.38 % Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.16/0.38 % Number of connectives : 14 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 1 &; 13 @)
% 0.16/0.38 % ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.16/0.38 % Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 4 avg)
% 0.16/0.38 % Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% 0.16/0.38 % Number of type conns : 5 ( 5 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% 0.16/0.38 % Number of symbols : 8 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.16/0.38 % Number of variables : 1 ( 0 ^; 1 !; 0 ?; 1 :)
% 0.16/0.38 % SPC : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 % Comments : This is a simple test problem for reasoning in/about SUMO.
% 0.16/0.38 % Initally the problem has been hand generated in KIF syntax in
% 0.16/0.38 % SigmaKEE and then automatically translated by Benzmueller's
% 0.16/0.38 % KIF2TH0 translator into THF syntax.
% 0.16/0.38 % : The translation has been applied in two modes: local and SInE.
% 0.16/0.38 % The local mode only translates the local assumptions and the
% 0.16/0.38 % query. The SInE mode additionally translates the SInE-extract
% 0.16/0.38 % of the loaded knowledge base (usually SUMO).
% 0.16/0.38 % : The examples are selected to illustrate the benefits of
% 0.16/0.38 % higher-order reasoning in ontology reasoning.
% 0.16/0.38 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.38 %----The extracted signature
% 0.16/0.38 thf(numbers,type,
% 0.16/0.38 num: $tType ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI,type,
% 0.16/0.38 holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.16/0.38 lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.16/0.38 lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.16/0.38 lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,type,
% 0.16/0.38 lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 0.16/0.38 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.16/0.38 n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 %----The translated axioms
% 0.16/0.38 thf(ax,axiom,
% 0.16/0.38 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 0.16/0.38 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 0.16/0.38 ! [X: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X @ $true ) ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 %----The translated conjecture
% 0.16/0.38 thf(con,conjecture,
% 0.16/0.38 ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
% 0.16/0.38 @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
% 0.16/0.38 & ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ) ).
% 0.16/0.38
% 0.16/0.38 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.38 ------------------------
% 0.22/1.30 ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 0.22/1.30 %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 0.22/1.30 %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 05:47:34 EST 2026
% 0.22/1.30 %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 0.22/1.30 %%% Logic specification used:
% 0.22/1.30 %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 0.22/1.30
% 0.22/1.30 % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.taX660nUyv/DTF2DTF17648.p
% 0.22/1.30 thf(numbers, type, num: $tType).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: ($i > ($o > $o))).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: ($i > $i)).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(ax, axiom, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i) @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(ax_001, axiom, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i) @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(ax_002, axiom, (! [X:$i]: (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X) @ $true)))).
% 0.22/1.30 thf(con, conjecture, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i)) @ (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i) @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i) @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))).
% 0.22/1.30 % SZS output end ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.taX660nUyv/DTF2DTF17648.p
% 0.22/1.30 ------------------------
% 0.22/1.31 ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 0.22/1.31 thf(numbers,type,
% 0.22/1.31 num: $tType ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI,type,
% 0.22/1.31 holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.22/1.31 lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.22/1.31 lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.22/1.31 lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,type,
% 0.22/1.31 lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 0.22/1.31 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.22/1.31 n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(ax,axiom,
% 0.22/1.31 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 0.22/1.31 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 0.22/1.31 ! [X: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X @ $true ) ).
% 0.22/1.31
% 0.22/1.31 thf(con,conjecture,
% 0.22/1.31 ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
% 0.22/1.31 @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
% 0.22/1.31 & ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ) ).
% 0.22/1.31 ------------------------
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17648 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17746)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17648 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17648 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17745)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17648 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17747)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17648 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17648 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17751)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17648 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)------------------------------
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)------------------------------
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/1.33
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)------------------------------
% 0.22/1.33 % (17749)------------------------------
% 0.22/1.33
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)First to succeed.
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)------------------------------
% 0.22/1.33 % (17748)------------------------------
% 0.22/1.33 % (17751)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/1.33 % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_17648
% 0.22/1.33 % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_17648
% 0.22/1.33 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(func_def_1, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(func_def_5, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(func_def_13, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 $false),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f22,f19])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true))) )),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ! [X0 : $i] : ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true))),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ! [X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f3,axiom,(
% 0.22/1.33 ! [X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X0 @ $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.taX660nUyv/DTF2THF_17648.p',ax_002)).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f22,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true) != $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f21,f17])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f2,axiom,(
% 0.22/1.33 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.22/1.33 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.taX660nUyv/DTF2THF_17648.p',ax_001)).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($true & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f18,f16])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.22/1.33 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.22/1.33 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.taX660nUyv/DTF2THF_17648.p',ax)).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) != $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) != $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) = $true)),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.22/1.33 ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.22/1.33 ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.22/1.33 inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4])).
% 0.22/1.33 thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 0.22/1.33 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.22/1.33 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.taX660nUyv/DTF2THF_17648.p',con)).
% 0.22/1.33 % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_17648
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)------------------------------
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/1.33
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)------------------------------
% 0.22/1.33 % (17750)------------------------------
% 0.22/1.33 % (17744)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------