↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : CSR122^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:46:49 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.48s 3.66s
% Output   : Proof 3.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : CSR122^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 19:45:23 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.48/3.66  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.48/3.66  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI X True) True
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.48/3.66    (Not
% 3.48/3.66      (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.48/3.66        (And (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i))))
% 3.48/3.66    True
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI a True) True
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): Eq
% 3.48/3.66    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.48/3.66      (And (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i)))
% 3.48/3.66    False
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #6 (by forward demodulation #[5, 0]): Eq
% 3.48/3.66    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.48/3.66      (And (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True))
% 3.48/3.66    False
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #7 (by bool simp #[6]): Eq
% 3.48/3.66    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.48/3.66      (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i))
% 3.48/3.66    False
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #8 (by forward demodulation #[7, 1]): Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) False
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #9 (by superposition #[8, 4]): Eq False True
% 3.48/3.66  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): False
% 3.48/3.66  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------