↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : CSR123^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:46:49 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.69s 3.93s
% Output   : Proof 3.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : CSR123^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 19:30:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.69/3.93  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/3.93  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lMary_THFTYPE_i lBill_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.69/3.93    (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.69/3.93      (Not (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i)))
% 3.69/3.93    True
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.69/3.93    (Not
% 3.69/3.93      (Exists fun P =>
% 3.69/3.93        Exists fun X =>
% 3.69/3.93          Exists fun Y =>
% 3.69/3.93            holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.69/3.93              (And (P lSue_THFTYPE_i X) (Not (P lSue_THFTYPE_i Y)))))
% 3.69/3.93    True
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #4 (by identity loobHoist #[2]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) True)
% 3.69/3.93    (Eq (Not (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i)) False)
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #5 (by identity boolHoist #[2]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.69/3.93    (Eq (Not (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i)) True)
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #6 (by clausification #[4]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) True)
% 3.69/3.93    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True)
% 3.69/3.93    (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) False)
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #8 (by clausification #[3]): Eq
% 3.69/3.93    (Exists fun P =>
% 3.69/3.93      Exists fun X =>
% 3.69/3.93        Exists fun Y =>
% 3.69/3.93          holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.69/3.93            (And (P lSue_THFTYPE_i X) (Not (P lSue_THFTYPE_i Y))))
% 3.69/3.93    False
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop),
% 3.69/3.93    Eq
% 3.69/3.93      (Exists fun X =>
% 3.69/3.93        Exists fun Y =>
% 3.69/3.93          holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.69/3.93            (And (a lSue_THFTYPE_i X) (Not (a lSue_THFTYPE_i Y))))
% 3.69/3.93      False
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota),
% 3.69/3.93    Eq
% 3.69/3.93      (Exists fun Y =>
% 3.69/3.93        holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.69/3.93          (And (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) (Not (a lSue_THFTYPE_i Y))))
% 3.69/3.93      False
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.69/3.93    Eq
% 3.69/3.93      (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i)
% 3.69/3.93        (And (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) (Not (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_2))))
% 3.69/3.93      False
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #12 (by identity loobHoist #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.69/3.93    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) False)
% 3.69/3.93      (Eq (And (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) (Not (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_2))) False)
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #13 (by identity boolHoist #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.69/3.93    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) False)
% 3.69/3.93      (Eq (And (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) (Not (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_2))) True)
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #14 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.69/3.93    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) False)
% 3.69/3.93      (Or (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) False) (Eq (Not (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_2)) False))
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.69/3.93    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) True) False)
% 3.69/3.93      (Or (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) False) (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_2) True))
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #16 (by superposition #[15, 6]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.69/3.93    Or (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) False)
% 3.69/3.93      (Or (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_2) True)
% 3.69/3.93        (Or (Eq False True) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True)))
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #17 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota),
% 3.69/3.93    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) False)
% 3.69/3.93      (Eq (Not (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1)) True)
% 3.69/3.93  Clause #19 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota),
% 3.69/3.93    Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) False)
% 3.77/3.94      (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) False)
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #20 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.77/3.94    Or (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) False)
% 3.77/3.94      (Or (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_2) True) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True))
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #32 (by superposition #[20, 0]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.77/3.94    Or (Eq ((fun x x => likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i x) lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True)
% 3.77/3.94      (Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #44 (by betaEtaReduce #[32]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.77/3.94    Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True)
% 3.77/3.94      (Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #45 (by clausification #[44]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.77/3.94    Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i a) True) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #47 (by equality factoring #[45]): Or (Ne True True) (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True)
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #57 (by clausification #[47]): Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq True False))
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #59 (by clausification #[57]): Or (Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True) (Eq True False)
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #60 (by clausification #[59]): Eq (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI lSue_THFTYPE_i lBen_THFTYPE_i) True
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #62 (by backward demodulation #[60, 7]): Or (Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True) (Eq True False)
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #67 (by clausification #[62]): Eq (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI n2009_THFTYPE_i) False) True
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #68 (by superposition #[67, 19]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) False)
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #87 (by clausification #[68]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Eq (a lSue_THFTYPE_i a_1) False
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #88 (by superposition #[87, 1]): Eq False True
% 3.77/3.94  Clause #97 (by clausification #[88]): False
% 3.77/3.94  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------