%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem : CSR124^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:47:15 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.34s
% Output : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR124^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.24 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.24 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.24 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.24 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.24 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.24 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.24 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.25 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:55:18 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.25 Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.17/0.28 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.28 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207643)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=1599467149:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207649)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207651)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=892354892:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207648)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=261906475_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207649)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2600541213:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207650)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=1207516668:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207652)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1656165950:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207654)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=3706470043:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3207643-3207653"...
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)...printing done.
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.17/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.34 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.34 thf(type_def_5, type, num: $tType).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(type_def_6, type, sTfun: ($tType * $tType) > $tType).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_2, type, disjointRelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_3, type, disjoint_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_5, type, domainSubclass_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: (($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_6, type, domainSubclass_THFTYPE_IiiioI: ($i > $i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_7, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIIiioIIiioIoIiioI: ((($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o) > $i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_8, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiiIiioI: (($i > $i) > $i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_9, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiiioIiioI: (($i > $i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_10, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: (($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_11, type, domain_THFTYPE_IiiioI: ($i > $i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_12, type, duration_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_15, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: ($i > $o > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_16, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIIiioIiioIioI: ((($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o) > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_17, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiiIioI: (($i > $i) > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_18, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiiiIioI: (($i > $i > $i) > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_19, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiiioIioI: (($i > $i > $i > $o) > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_20, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: (($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_21, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiooIioI: (($i > $o > $o) > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_22, type, instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_26, type, lBeginFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: ($i > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_30, type, lCardinalityFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: ($i > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_33, type, lEndFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: ($i > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_39, type, lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_IiiiI: ($i > $i > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_51, type, lTemporalCompositionFn_THFTYPE_IiiiI: ($i > $i > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_59, type, lWhenFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: ($i > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_61, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: ($i > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_65, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_66, type, located_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_67, type, meetsTemporally_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_68, type, minus_THFTYPE_IiiiI: ($i > $i > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_75, type, part_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_77, type, rangeSubclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_78, type, range_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_79, type, relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: (($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_80, type, relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IiIiiIoI: ($i > ($i > $i) > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_81, type, relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_83, type, subProcess_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_84, type, subclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_85, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIioIIioIoI: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_86, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_87, type, temporalPart_THFTYPE_IiioI: ($i > $i > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_89, type, vNOT: ($o > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_92, type, vAND: ($o > $o > $o)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_93, type, sK0: (($i > $i > $o) > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_94, type, sK1: (($i > $i > $o) > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_95, type, sK2: (($i > $i > $o) > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_97, type, sK4: (($i > $i > $o) > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(func_def_98, type, sK5: ($i > $i > $i)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f6,axiom,(
% 0.17/0.34 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.17/0.34 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_005)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f25,axiom,(
% 0.17/0.34 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.17/0.34 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_024)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f192,conjecture,(
% 0.17/0.34 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.17/0.34 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f193,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.17/0.34 ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f192])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f204,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(rectify,[],[f6])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f205,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) = $true)),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f204])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f242,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(rectify,[],[f25])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f243,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f242])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f574,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(rectify,[],[f193])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f575,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 ~ ($true = ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))))),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f574])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f576,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 ($true != ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))))),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(flattening,[],[f575])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f644,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) = $true)),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f205])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f666,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f243])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f836,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 ($true != ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))))),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f576])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f838,definition,(
% 0.17/0.34 ( ! [X0 : $o] : (($true = X0) | ($false = X0)) )),
% 0.17/0.34 introduced(theory,[fool_exhaustiveness_axiom])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f854,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 ($true != ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ($true & (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))) | (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $false)),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f836,f838])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f860,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))) != $true) | (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $false)),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f854])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f870,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $false)),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f860,f644])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f910,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 ($true = $false)),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f870,f666])).
% 0.17/0.34 thf(f913,plain,(
% 0.17/0.34 $false),
% 0.17/0.34 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f910])).
% 0.17/0.34 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207653)Instructions burned: 34 (million)
% 0.17/0.34 % (3207643)Success in time 0.044 s
% 0.17/0.34 % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------