%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem : CSR125^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 08:43:02 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.71s 1.44s
% Output : Refutation 1.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 10 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 71 ( 9 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 62 ( 10 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 52 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 ^; 4 !; 0 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
num: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_13,type,
ph1:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f25,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f22,f17]) ).
thf(f17,plain,
( $true
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).
thf(f15,plain,
( $true
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ),
inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
( $true
!= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ),
inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,conjecture,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VbNPjCLara/DTF2THF_7192.p',con) ).
thf(f22,plain,
( $true
= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ) ),
inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
( $true
= ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ~ $true ) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f16]) ).
thf(f16,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,axiom,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VbNPjCLara/DTF2THF_7192.p',ax) ).
thf(f18,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) )
= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) ),
inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).
thf(f3,axiom,
! [X0: $i] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VbNPjCLara/DTF2THF_7192.p',ax_002) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : CSR125^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 05:48:24 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.33 Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.18/0.46 ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.18/0.47 thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.18/0.47 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 % File : CSR125^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.18/0.47 % Domain : Commonsense Reasoning
% 0.18/0.47 % Problem : Sue contradicts her likes
% 0.18/0.47 % Version : Especial.
% 0.18/0.47 % English : Mary likes Bill and Sue likes Bill. During 2009 Sue didn't like
% 0.18/0.47 % anybody. During year 2009 we get a contradiction.
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 % Refs : [Ben10] Benzmueller (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.18/0.47 % Source : [Ben10]
% 0.18/0.47 % Names : ef_7.tq_SUMO_local [Ben10]
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 % Status : Theorem
% 0.18/0.47 % Rating : 0.08 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.08 v8.2.0, 0.09 v8.1.0, 0.08 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.10 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.50 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.50 v4.1.0
% 0.18/0.47 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 2 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% 0.18/0.47 % Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ; 1 cnn)
% 0.18/0.47 % Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.18/0.47 % Number of connectives : 14 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 13 @)
% 0.18/0.47 % ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.18/0.47 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% 0.18/0.47 % Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% 0.18/0.47 % Number of type conns : 5 ( 5 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% 0.18/0.47 % Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.18/0.47 % Number of variables : 1 ( 0 ^; 1 !; 0 ?; 1 :)
% 0.18/0.47 % SPC : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 % Comments : This is a simple test problem for reasoning in/about SUMO.
% 0.18/0.47 % Initally the problem has been hand generated in KIF syntax in
% 0.18/0.47 % SigmaKEE and then automatically translated by Benzmueller's
% 0.18/0.47 % KIF2TH0 translator into THF syntax.
% 0.18/0.47 % : The translation has been applied in two modes: local and SInE.
% 0.18/0.47 % The local mode only translates the local assumptions and the
% 0.18/0.47 % query. The SInE mode additionally translates the SInE-extract
% 0.18/0.47 % of the loaded knowledge base (usually SUMO).
% 0.18/0.47 % : The examples are selected to illustrate the benefits of
% 0.18/0.47 % higher-order reasoning in ontology reasoning.
% 0.18/0.47 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 %----The extracted signature
% 0.18/0.47 thf(numbers,type,
% 0.18/0.47 num: $tType ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI,type,
% 0.18/0.47 holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.18/0.47 lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.18/0.47 lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.18/0.47 lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,type,
% 0.18/0.47 lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 0.18/0.47 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 0.18/0.47 n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 %----The translated axioms
% 0.18/0.47 thf(ax,axiom,
% 0.18/0.47 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 0.18/0.47 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 0.18/0.47 ! [X: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( (~) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ) ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 %----The translated conjecture
% 0.18/0.47 thf(con,conjecture,
% 0.18/0.47 holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ).
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 ------------------------
% 1.71/1.41 ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.71/1.41 %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.71/1.41 %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 05:48:25 EST 2026
% 1.71/1.41 %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.71/1.41 %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.71/1.41 %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.71/1.41
% 1.71/1.41 % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VbNPjCLara/DTF2DTF7192.p
% See solution above
% 1.71/1.41 ------------------------
% 1.71/1.42 ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.71/1.42 thf(numbers,type,
% 1.71/1.42 num: $tType ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI,type,
% 1.71/1.42 holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.71/1.42 lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.71/1.42 lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.71/1.42 lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI,type,
% 1.71/1.42 lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI,type,
% 1.71/1.42 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i,type,
% 1.71/1.42 n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(ax,axiom,
% 1.71/1.42 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(ax_001,axiom,
% 1.71/1.42 likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(ax_002,axiom,
% 1.71/1.42 ! [X: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( (~) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ) ).
% 1.71/1.42
% 1.71/1.42 thf(con,conjecture,
% 1.71/1.42 holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ).
% 1.71/1.42 ------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_7192 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7337)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_7192 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_7192 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_7192 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7338)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_7192 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_7192 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7342)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_7192 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.71/1.44
% 1.71/1.44
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7341)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.44
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7339)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.71/1.44
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7340)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)First to succeed.
% 1.71/1.44 % (7338)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.71/1.44 % (7342)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.71/1.44 % (7337)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.71/1.44 % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_7192
% 1.71/1.44 % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_7192
% 1.71/1.44 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(func_def_1, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(func_def_5, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(func_def_6, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(func_def_13, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 $false),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f22,f17])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ($true != (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ~($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.71/1.44 ~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 1.71/1.44 (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)),
% 1.71/1.44 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VbNPjCLara/DTF2THF_7192.p',con)).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ($true = (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ $true)))),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f16])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.71/1.44 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
% 1.71/1.44 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VbNPjCLara/DTF2THF_7192.p',ax)).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))) = $true)) )),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ! [X0 : $i] : ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0))) = $true)),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.71/1.44 ! [X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 1.71/1.44 inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.71/1.44 thf(f3,axiom,(
% 1.71/1.44 ! [X0 : $i] : (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
% 1.71/1.44 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VbNPjCLara/DTF2THF_7192.p',ax_002)).
% 1.71/1.44 % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_7192
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.71/1.44
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7336)------------------------------
% 1.71/1.44 % (7335)Success in time 0.02 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------