%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CSR125^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tk9yBYhpC9 true
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:32:21 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 4.35s 1.17s
% Output : Refutation 4.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 3 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ; 4 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 55 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 46 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 15 ( 11 usr; 7 con; 0-6 aty)
% ( 2 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 1 ^; 2 !; 0 ?; 3 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_type,type,
lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).
thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_type,type,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).
thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_type,type,
lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).
thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_type,type,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(s_comb_type,type,
'#S':
!>[A: $tType,B: $tType,C: $tType] : ( ( A > B > C ) > ( A > B ) > A > C ) ).
thf(c_comb_type,type,
'#C':
!>[A: $tType,B: $tType,C: $tType] : ( ( A > B > C ) > B > A > C ) ).
thf(b_comb_type,type,
'#B':
!>[A: $tType,B: $tType,C: $tType] : ( ( A > B ) > ( C > A ) > C > B ) ).
thf(k_comb_type,type,
'#K':
!>[A: $tType,B: $tType] : ( B > A > B ) ).
thf(i_comb_type,type,
'#I':
!>[A: $tType] : ( A > A ) ).
thf(con,conjecture,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl242,plain,
~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(ax_082,axiom,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ).
thf(zip_derived_cl89,plain,
likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax_082]) ).
thf(ax_068,axiom,
! [X: $i] :
( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
@ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl73,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( (~) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax_068]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl74,plain,
!! @ ( '#B' @ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) ) @ ( '#B' @ (~) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
inference(lams2combs,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl73]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl314,plain,
! [X2: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( (~) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl74]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl578,plain,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( (~) @ $true ),
inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl89,zip_derived_cl314]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl582,plain,
holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ $false,
inference('simplify boolean subterms',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl578]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl586,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl242,zip_derived_cl582]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : CSR125^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tk9yBYhpC9 true
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 15:02:38 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.33 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.34 % Running in HO mode
% 0.69/0.58 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.69/0.58 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.69/0.58 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.78/0.61 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 1.04/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 1.04/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 1.04/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 1.04/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 1.04/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 1.04/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 1.35/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 1.35/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s
% 1.35/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s
% 4.35/1.17 % Solved by lams/40_b.comb.sh.
% 4.35/1.17 % done 251 iterations in 0.461s
% 4.35/1.17 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 4.35/1.17 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 4.35/1.17
% 4.35/1.17
% 4.35/1.17 % Terminating...
% 5.59/1.29 % Runner terminated.
% 5.59/1.30 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------