↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR126^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:46:55 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 13.35s 4.30s
% Output   : Refutation 13.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  134 (  25 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  302 (  49   ~;  16   |;   0   &; 222   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0   ^;  37   !;   0   ?;  37   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).

thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_decl,type,
    lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).

thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(36,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_024) ).

thf(93,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[36]) ).

thf(94,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[93]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(182,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[94,44]) ).

thf(183,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
     != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[182]) ).

thf(196,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[183]) ).

thf(199,plain,
    ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
   != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[196]) ).

thf(202,plain,
    ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
    | ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[199]) ).

thf(34,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
      @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
       => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_005) ).

thf(90,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
      @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
       => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(91,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
      @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
       => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[90]) ).

thf(40,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $o] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ~ B )
     => ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_022) ).

thf(100,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $o] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ~ B )
     => ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

thf(101,plain,
    ! [B: $o,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ~ B )
      | ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[100]) ).

thf(191,plain,
    ! [C: $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ ~ C )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[94,101]) ).

thf(192,plain,
    ! [C: $o,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ ~ C )
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[191]) ).

thf(193,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ A
        @ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[192:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ))]]) ).

thf(225,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
          @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
           => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B
          @ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[91,193]) ).

thf(226,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
        @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
         => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) )
     != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ B
        @ ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[225]) ).

thf(229,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
       != B )
      | ( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
         => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) )
       != ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[226]) ).

thf(231,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
       => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) )
     != ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[229]) ).

thf(321,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
         => $true )
       != ( ~ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) )
      | ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[202,231]) ).

thf(322,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
      | ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[321]) ).

thf(323,plain,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[322:[bind(A,$thf( lBill_THFTYPE_i ))]]) ).

thf(204,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
          @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
           => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) )
       != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[91,44]) ).

thf(205,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
        @ ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
         => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) )
     != ( holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) @ ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[204]) ).

thf(217,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
         => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) )
       != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[205]) ).

thf(222,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A )
       => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) )
     != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[217]) ).

thf(354,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( $true
         => ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A ) )
       != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[323,222]) ).

thf(355,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ A )
       != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) )
      | ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
       != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[354]) ).

thf(356,plain,
    ( ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i )
   != ( likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[355:[bind(A,$thf( lBill_THFTYPE_i ))]]) ).

thf(365,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[356]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR126^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.22  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 17:55:17 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.02/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.56/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (296ms). 
% 1.56/1.11  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 3.00/1.50  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 3.00/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.28/1.64  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 191 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.49/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 41 axioms (removed 150 axioms). 
% 3.49/1.79  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 3.82/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.82/1.80  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 12.92/4.30  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 13.35/4.30  % Time passed: 3934ms (effective reasoning time: 3177ms)
% 13.35/4.30  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 13.35/4.30  % Axioms used in derivation (3): ax_024, ax_005, ax_022
% 13.35/4.30  % No. of inferences in proof: 35
% 13.35/4.30  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3934 ms resp. 3177 ms w/o parsing
% 13.35/4.34  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 13.35/4.34  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------