↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR126_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:03:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.92s 2.80s
% Output   : Refutation 4.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  135 (  25 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  296 (  42   ~;  20   |;   1   &; 222   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0   ^;  24   !;   0   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI_decl,type,
    holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o ).

thf(lBill_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lMary_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lSue_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI_decl,type,
    lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i ).

thf(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI_decl,type,
    likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(n2009_THFTYPE_i_decl,type,
    n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ~ ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
       != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,5]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
     != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ( A
       != ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
   != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
    | ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
     != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
    | ~ ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
    | ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[16,5]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ( ~ ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
    | ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[22:[]]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_001) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
           => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
          @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
       != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[9,5]) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
         => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
        @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
     != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
         => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
       != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ( ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI )
       != ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

thf(77,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
     != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

thf(93,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       != ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ( ( $true
         => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
       != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ~ ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[23,77]) ).

thf(94,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       != ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
       != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ~ ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[93]) ).

thf(95,plain,
    ( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
     != ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
    | ~ ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[94:[bind(A,$thf( lBill_THFTYPE_i ))]]) ).

thf(120,plain,
    ~ ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[95]) ).

thf(123,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
       != ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7,120]) ).

thf(124,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) @ ( A @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
     != ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[123]) ).

thf(126,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
      | ( A
       != ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[124]) ).

thf(132,plain,
    ~ ( lBill_THFTYPE_i @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[126]) ).

thf(121,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
           => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
          @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
       != ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[9,120]) ).

thf(122,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
         => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
        @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) )
     != ( $true @ ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[121]) ).

thf(125,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
         => ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ) )
      | ( ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI )
       != ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[122]) ).

thf(127,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( A @ ( lSue_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
        | ( ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI )
         != ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI ) ) )
      & ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
        | ( ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI )
         != ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[125]) ).

thf(128,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) )
      | ( ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI )
       != ( n2009_THFTYPE_i @ lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[127]) ).

thf(130,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( lMary_THFTYPE_i @ likes_THFTYPE_IiioI ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[128]) ).

thf(159,plain,
    ~ $true,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[132,130]) ).

thf(160,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[159]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR126_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/0.41  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.41  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 01:17:12 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.24/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (185ms). 
% 1.38/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.98/1.61  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.98/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.15/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.15/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.15/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 2.15/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.15/1.78  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.62/2.80  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.92/2.80  % Time passed: 2243ms (effective reasoning time: 1586ms)
% 4.92/2.80  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.92/2.80  % Axioms used in derivation (2): ax, ax_001
% 4.92/2.80  % No. of inferences in proof: 36
% 4.92/2.80  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2243 ms resp. 1586 ms w/o parsing
% 4.92/2.85  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.92/2.85  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------